Originally Posted by FlashBazbo You forget basic history (or maybe you're too young to have lived it). When current CAFE standards were first introduced, they DID eliminate cars like the
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
05-21-2009, 05:38 PM | #1 (permalink) | |
Base Member
|
Quote:
My original point remains. Yes, things will advance and change as they always have. The Z will ever evolve, and Nissan will pump up mileage on the commodity models to reach the required average. Big deal. Can we stop the hyperbole now? |
|
05-21-2009, 07:31 PM | #2 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North East
Posts: 6,203
Drives: 09 370Z Sport M6
Rep Power: 653 |
Quote:
|
|
05-21-2009, 09:26 PM | #3 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 257
Drives: 06 Mustang GT
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
Having that raised to 39 mpg in 7 years... that's pretty significant when it hasn't risen in nearly 20 years. I'd say being worried that a 40% increase in the CAFE standards in the next 7 years might adversely affect the Z is not hyperbole at all.
__________________
Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven. |
|
05-22-2009, 02:43 PM | #4 (permalink) | |
Base Member
|
Quote:
Your second point is not so good. Marquee models with their accompanying lower mpg are a reality for most manufactures because they don't sell that many of them. If Nissan sold 50k+ Z's, you'd be right. But they don't. Hyperbole and hysteria in this thread? Yes. |
|
05-22-2009, 04:16 PM | #5 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 257
Drives: 06 Mustang GT
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
I think the abrupt increases in the MPG standards *will* affect the Z's design. Sure, it's not a huge seller or a huge percentage of Nissan's US sales, but having a car that is currently 16 or 17 MPG under the standard that will be law in 7 short years will call for some fairly significant engineering. And besides, with a 39 mpg standard, Nissan is gonna have to sell a good number of cars that EXCEED that level in order to make up for the Z and all its other low MPG cars. How many Nissan models get more than 39 mpg? I can't think of any. The Z may be especially vulnerable simply because Nissan is a smaller car company that may not have the capital to so radically re-engineer their product line. The easiest way for them to meet the standards will be to eliminate low-mileage cars like the Z from their lineup entirely. It may be pessimistic, but this is truly the way I see it going down.
__________________
Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|