Nissan 370Z Forum  

What do the new CAFE standards mean for the Z?

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z General Area > Nissan 370Z General Discussions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-20-2009, 02:49 PM   #1 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: teluria
Posts: 30
Drives: 20 mule team waggon
Rep Power: 17
tolnep is on a distinguished road
Default

tolnep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 03:13 PM   #2 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: teluria
Posts: 30
Drives: 20 mule team waggon
Rep Power: 17
tolnep is on a distinguished road
Default

pelosi mobile..

http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAqPMJFaEdY

Last edited by tolnep; 05-20-2009 at 08:58 PM.
tolnep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 03:57 PM   #3 (permalink)
Base Member
 
carguyg35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fort Drum, NY
Posts: 32
Drives: golf cart
Rep Power: 17
carguyg35 is on a distinguished road
Default

How CAFE Ratings Work - Auto - FOXNews.com

That is a good read on CAFE standards. I think nissan will be fine meeting the goal. Some of the others further down the list have some things to worry about. Nissan is already at 32.2. They will just improve their small car offering and more people will buy them. Plus gas is bound to be higher in a few years and that will help them sell more fuel efficient cars too.
carguyg35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 05:00 PM   #4 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 118
Drives: 09 370Z Blk Sp 7AT
Rep Power: 17
2bits is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to 2bits
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carguyg35 View Post
How CAFE Ratings Work - Auto - FOXNews.com

That is a good read on CAFE standards. I think nissan will be fine meeting the goal. Some of the others further down the list have some things to worry about. Nissan is already at 32.2. They will just improve their small car offering and more people will buy them. Plus gas is bound to be higher in a few years and that will help them sell more fuel efficient cars too.
Exactly, people need to resist getting worked up into a lather and jumping to unfounded conclusions (you know who you are). Current CAFE standards didn't eliminate cars like the Viper, Z06, GT-R, etc, so why the hell would we assume this means death to the Z?
2bits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 06:28 PM   #5 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 97
Drives: '09 370Z T-SP-7AT
Rep Power: 0
FlashBazbo is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2bits View Post
Exactly, people need to resist getting worked up into a lather and jumping to unfounded conclusions (you know who you are). Current CAFE standards didn't eliminate cars like the Viper, Z06, GT-R, etc, so why the hell would we assume this means death to the Z?
You forget basic history (or maybe you're too young to have lived it). When current CAFE standards were first introduced, they DID eliminate cars like the Viper, Z06, GT-R, etc. No legal high performance car survived in the U.S. They killed Challenger, Barracuda, Z-28, Mustang (the horrid Mustang II was a CAFE special), Road Runner, GTO, Marauder, Cougar -- those very few performance cars that survived did so only by losing the performance. Raising the CAFE took us through a dark automotive age and it took over twenty years for technology to catch up and give us performance cars on the same level as we had before. During those dark years from the mid-70's, a 200-hp Corvette was considered a BIG deal just two years after they offered several Vette engines of over 400 hp.

It is utterly unrealistic to think moving to a 39 mpg CAFE won't have a radical impact on the offerings of the industry. Just within the last six months, the CAFE zealots at EPA and NHTSA have published documents saying that a 36 mpg standard was technologically infeasible by 2016. If those in government who want it most think it won't work . . . .
FlashBazbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 08:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
ChrisSlicks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North East
Posts: 6,203
Drives: 09 370Z Sport M6
Rep Power: 654
ChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond repute
Default

It's scare tactics. When they realize that the majority can't comply they will push the date back. I'm sure the auto manufacturers (except Toyota) have already dispatched their lobbyists to Washington.
ChrisSlicks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 10:57 PM   #7 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
fly yellow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 455
Drives: 09 yellow 370z
Rep Power: 266
fly yellow has a reputation beyond reputefly yellow has a reputation beyond reputefly yellow has a reputation beyond reputefly yellow has a reputation beyond reputefly yellow has a reputation beyond reputefly yellow has a reputation beyond reputefly yellow has a reputation beyond reputefly yellow has a reputation beyond reputefly yellow has a reputation beyond reputefly yellow has a reputation beyond reputefly yellow has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisSlicks View Post
It's scare tactics. When they realize that the majority can't comply they will push the date back. I'm sure the auto manufacturers (except Toyota) have already dispatched their lobbyists to Washington.
I wish that were the case, but two of the three domestic automakers are owned or at least controlled by the government. I don't think foreign manufacturers have much of a lobbying precense here in Washington, and like you said, Toyota, the #1 import in this country has already made this their business model. Honda is well on their way to following the same model. The European cars in this country fill a luxury market and they will just pay the fines and price their vehicles accordingly. Their clients can afford it.

I strongly believe we will see the death of cars like the Z, the Mustang GT, the Camaro SS (we harly knew ya), and maybe even the Corvette. GM has already done away with their high performance vehicle operations department. They said they will still produce the cars that are out there, but have no plans to develop new ones.

It is going to be an expensive proposition for car companies to develop these cars. I don't see them spending much to develop better sports cars that will only bring down their overall CAFE rating.

Enjoy these cars while you still can. I don't know how many years it will be before this country comes back to it's senses.
fly yellow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2009, 05:38 PM   #8 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 118
Drives: 09 370Z Blk Sp 7AT
Rep Power: 17
2bits is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to 2bits
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashBazbo View Post
You forget basic history (or maybe you're too young to have lived it). When current CAFE standards were first introduced, they DID eliminate cars like the Viper, Z06, GT-R, etc. No legal high performance car survived in the U.S. They killed Challenger, Barracuda, Z-28, Mustang (the horrid Mustang II was a CAFE special), Road Runner, GTO, Marauder, Cougar -- those very few performance cars that survived did so only by losing the performance. Raising the CAFE took us through a dark automotive age and it took over twenty years for technology to catch up and give us performance cars on the same level as we had before. During those dark years from the mid-70's, a 200-hp Corvette was considered a BIG deal just two years after they offered several Vette engines of over 400 hp.

It is utterly unrealistic to think moving to a 39 mpg CAFE won't have a radical impact on the offerings of the industry. Just within the last six months, the CAFE zealots at EPA and NHTSA have published documents saying that a 36 mpg standard was technologically infeasible by 2016. If those in government who want it most think it won't work . . . .
I haven't forgotten history. We've had CAFE standards increase over the past 35 years. You choose to focus on the initial shock in the 70's, then extrapolate out that horror to today and well beyond. You ignore the fact that today WE DO HAVE the cars I cited despite the highest CAFE standards ever. You've just flat out lost your perspective.

My original point remains. Yes, things will advance and change as they always have. The Z will ever evolve, and Nissan will pump up mileage on the commodity models to reach the required average. Big deal. Can we stop the hyperbole now?
2bits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2009, 07:31 PM   #9 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
ChrisSlicks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North East
Posts: 6,203
Drives: 09 370Z Sport M6
Rep Power: 654
ChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond reputeChrisSlicks has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2bits View Post
I haven't forgotten history. We've had CAFE standards increase over the past 35 years. You choose to focus on the initial shock in the 70's, then extrapolate out that horror to today and well beyond. You ignore the fact that today WE DO HAVE the cars I cited despite the highest CAFE standards ever. You've just flat out lost your perspective.

My original point remains. Yes, things will advance and change as they always have. The Z will ever evolve, and Nissan will pump up mileage on the commodity models to reach the required average. Big deal. Can we stop the hyperbole now?
Agreed. Nissan sells 1 million cars a year (well they used to) in which to make their average. They can afford to have a few cars under the average if they are low volume. The high volume economy cars will bring the average up.
ChrisSlicks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2009, 09:26 PM   #10 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
jakoye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 257
Drives: 06 Mustang GT
Rep Power: 17
jakoye is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2bits View Post
I haven't forgotten history. We've had CAFE standards increase over the past 35 years. You choose to focus on the initial shock in the 70's, then extrapolate out that horror to today and well beyond. You ignore the fact that today WE DO HAVE the cars I cited despite the highest CAFE standards ever. You've just flat out lost your perspective.

My original point remains. Yes, things will advance and change as they always have. The Z will ever evolve, and Nissan will pump up mileage on the commodity models to reach the required average. Big deal. Can we stop the hyperbole now?
Except... CAFE standards haven't risen for passenger cars since 1990, when they reached their present level of 27.5.

Having that raised to 39 mpg in 7 years... that's pretty significant when it hasn't risen in nearly 20 years.

I'd say being worried that a 40% increase in the CAFE standards in the next 7 years might adversely affect the Z is not hyperbole at all.
__________________
Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven.
jakoye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2009, 04:43 PM   #11 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 18
Drives: '04 Pontiac GTO
Rep Power: 17
MikeGTO is on a distinguished road
Default

CAFE was first passed in 1975 and didnt actually kick in until 1978.
Corporate Average Fuel Economy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You can't blame it (directly) for the death of any of the classic muscle/sport cars you mentioned. It just piled some extra dirt on top of their corpses.

What killed the musclecars was a combination of higher gas prices, high insurance, the changeover to unleaded gas, and the increasing amount of emission controls. But none of those are CAFE.


Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashBazbo View Post
You forget basic history (or maybe you're too young to have lived it). When current CAFE standards were first introduced, they DID eliminate cars like the Viper, Z06, GT-R, etc. No legal high performance car survived in the U.S. They killed Challenger, Barracuda, Z-28, Mustang (the horrid Mustang II was a CAFE special), Road Runner, GTO, Marauder, Cougar -- those very few performance cars that survived did so only by losing the performance. Raising the CAFE took us through a dark automotive age and it took over twenty years for technology to catch up and give us performance cars on the same level as we had before. During those dark years from the mid-70's, a 200-hp Corvette was considered a BIG deal just two years after they offered several Vette engines of over 400 hp.
MikeGTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2009, 09:43 AM   #12 (permalink)
Track Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: league city, tx
Posts: 757
Drives: 09' Solid Red 370z
Rep Power: 18
iceman21_23 is on a distinguished road
Default

well think of it this way the z gets 26mpg right now, adding DI in the 2012 model should bolster that up to 29-30 then a little ecu tuning can easily get u to the 35.5 if need be, but alas Nissan will probably just drop the Z line in america
iceman21_23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2009, 10:39 AM   #13 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 97
Drives: '09 370Z T-SP-7AT
Rep Power: 0
FlashBazbo is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman21_23 View Post
well think of it this way the z gets 26mpg right now, adding DI in the 2012 model should bolster that up to 29-30 then a little ecu tuning can easily get u to the 35.5 if need be, but alas Nissan will probably just drop the Z line in america
Problem: The Z doesn't get 26 overall right now -- it gets 26 on the highway cycle. It gets 22 overall. (And less than that on my mostly-highway driving.)

What "little ecu tuning" would get the car to 35.5? An ecu that deactivates three of the cylinders?
FlashBazbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2009, 10:35 AM   #14 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 97
Drives: '09 370Z T-SP-7AT
Rep Power: 0
FlashBazbo is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

LSUTurboTiger, I read the same stuff about Tesla. (Maybe AutoWeek? Maybe the Wall Street Journal?) It's about to implode. People are headed for prison, by all reports. The money guys and promoters apparently got taken for a ride (if you believe their side of the story). The car won't do what they claim, plus, it costs 50% more to build than they've sold it for. Very, very ugly.

Too many people in the media and in the Green movement wanted it to be true, so it was "true."

Last edited by FlashBazbo; 05-21-2009 at 10:41 AM.
FlashBazbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2009, 10:52 AM   #15 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
SoCal 370Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: US of A
Posts: 2,842
Drives: Answers
Rep Power: 34
SoCal 370Z has a reputation beyond reputeSoCal 370Z has a reputation beyond reputeSoCal 370Z has a reputation beyond reputeSoCal 370Z has a reputation beyond reputeSoCal 370Z has a reputation beyond reputeSoCal 370Z has a reputation beyond reputeSoCal 370Z has a reputation beyond reputeSoCal 370Z has a reputation beyond reputeSoCal 370Z has a reputation beyond reputeSoCal 370Z has a reputation beyond reputeSoCal 370Z has a reputation beyond repute
Arrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashBazbo View Post
LSUTurboTiger, I read the same stuff about Tesla. (Maybe AutoWeek? Maybe the Wall Street Journal?) It's about to implode. People are headed for prison, by all reports. The money guys and promoters apparently got taken for a ride (if you believe their side of the story). The car won't do what they claim, plus, it costs 50% more to build than they've sold it for. Very, very ugly.

Too many people in the media and in the Green movement wanted it to be true, so it was "true."
Tesla is doing well, and now even better: Daimler takes a stake in electric carmaker Tesla

Tesla Motors Press Room

I am currently considering placing a reservation on a Tesla S. My wife has visited Tesla's main showroom, in Menlo Park, CA, and came away very impressed.
__________________
( Click to show/hide )
SoCal 370Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2