![]() |
Hahaha... no comparison. I rented the v6 camaro. For what you would pay in a Z I would just make the SS an option. The V6 camaro feels heavy wide
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14859 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hahaha... no comparison. I rented the v6 camaro. For what you would pay in a Z I would just make the SS an option. The V6 camaro feels heavy wide and clumsy. The extra power in the SS makes a huge difference but still. The Z is precise and fast. The camaro(SS only) is brute fast. There's no comparison. You would have to figure out what you want to live with. 4 seat muscle or 2 seat precision.
The 2012 camaro v6 is getting a new engine and a bump and coming this summer. I also heard the FE4 susp will be an option due to the fe3 sucking. If this is so and camaro sheds a few lbs in the refresh???? Maybe the v6 might be worth the look??? But 2010/2011 in v6 form. HELL TO THE NO! What do you mean by engine speed? The chevy revs at lower rpms and does the quarter in over 14 seconds. About 1.3 seconds slower than a Z. Last edited by UNKNOWN_370; 02-26-2011 at 09:38 PM. |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2012 Camaro ZL1 (was: Z28) | flashburn | Other Vehicles | 37 | 02-13-2011 01:36 PM |
| camaro at work | murphman | Texas | 6 | 01-28-2011 08:26 PM |
| 2012 Camaro Z28 | MC | Other Vehicles | 55 | 07-24-2010 07:38 PM |
| 725hp LS9 Camaro | The Weapon | Other Vehicles | 2 | 03-11-2010 06:21 PM |
| New Cop Camaro | nogoodname | The Lounge (Off Topic) | 22 | 07-19-2009 04:07 PM |