![]() |
Quote:
I do not see this directly hurting the sales of the Rogue, as the Rogue is a female market car and the Juke actually is pushed towards the male market. For those who do not want a rugged offroad vehicle (Xterra) you can have a fun, sporty highway/city vehicle. |
and AWD when you wanna have some off road fun, woot.
|
|
kinda looks like a fat happy little warthog....
|
LOL just needs some lower fangs coming out of the grille.
|
Quote:
|
...and if Ford made it this forum would be all over tearing the thing apart, lol.
It looks like a dog to me. Makes me think the Pontiac Vibe was just 10 years too early for its time. |
lil fat car..needs a diet..haha
|
You guys call it fat, but it weights:
2,912 up to 3,210 |
Quote:
|
That's sweet. But honestly I need more MPG. I really want something that will get me ~30 mpg in town and ~40 highway.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
:ohsnap1::ohsnap1:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I cant see the camero having more power than the vette, as their flagship car. Unless they do the same for the vette
|
Quote:
The 5.0 beats the Camaro SS, the Z28 is a supercharged Camaro SS which is meant to take on the GT500. Which as of right now is in a bit of limbo because the contract for the GT500 ends this year and a decision is still being made on where ford wants to go with the top end Mustang. Same 5.4L with a SC? Use the 5.0L with a SC or eco boost tech? Something new? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
BTW did the GT500 take the place of the cobra or are they suppose to come out with a new one?
|
Quote:
|
GT500 replaces the Cobra.
I am so glad the Stangs are back on top. Makes me remember when I was a kid and envied one of my mother's friend's son with his black 5.0. That thing would eat Camaros all day and night. We actually saw him street racing once downtown when we were coming back from an event my dad was being honored yet. My parents are so cool, they did not snitch on him. Great. That said, I just watched that vid from a few pages back. That Evolution Performance Stang is Armageddon. Just sick. Red and M4A1, when are you doing that to your 5.0's???!!?! Dont S/C them, keep them N/A!!!! I still go to most of the professional drag events at Firebird Raceway with my dad. I can't wait to watch some of those 5.0's bad boys running. DANG I can't wait. And the Juke is cool. I thought about getting one for my DD, but I think I will pay my wife's CX7 off and get her a CX9. I will keep the CX7 as a DD and tune it!! AWD and the MS3 motor baby!!! I just have to shampoo the seats due to my darn girls putting their feet on them. No biggie. Late!! |
Quote:
The Camaro did not exist for how many years? The 4.6L Mustang run 0.1 second slower than the current Camaro SS and then less than a year later we have the updated 5.0L and the Mustang wipes the floor with it. What does GM do to respond, they start to rush out a z28. Not saying it was already going to happen, as it was, but countless people inside GM said the Z28 had been delayed, delayed, delayed and then they said they have been working hard for the past few months trying to get a Z28 to market quickly. I will honest, I am very happy to see this fight begin again. Now if a real Dodge contender would step up, but we all know that will not happen again. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I hear ya Red... Well, if you are going F/I, Kenne Bell is the way to go!! I miss that most from my Stang days.
Sorry about your father. I guess you have to live it up in double portion for him!! Man Up (like I had to tell you that....). And you are correct about the new Challenger. It MAY give the GT and SS some iritation, but I doubt it.... |
Quote:
Or send some to me so I can get my FI. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This always amazes me. People will shell out $20K+ for a new car that will get 5mpg more than a nice, low-mile, clean, used $10K car and then BS you about how they are "saving money". |
Quote:
I heard the Z28 will correct interior shortcomings. If it does, then it might be something. However, I regard the 5th gen F-body as an excercise in failure. The 2005 mustang GT was WAY! better than the 2004. The 2011, way better than the 2010. The new F-body---well, I would buy a moth-balled 2002 before I would buy a new 2010. I think they look better, and they perform AT LEAST as well. |
Quote:
My pop had one for about a year. He's more of a truck guy, so he traded it for another truck, but he did like the car. Looks are subjective, but the car got compliments everywhere he went, even a year after introduction. When new, my previous gen F-body never got anywhere near as many positive remarks. Personally, I think the new car is much sharper looking. The interior? Well, I don't think the design is as good as it could be, though the seats are well done. I also like the gauges and the door panel design. The radio/HVAC console does need a redo, IMO. Impressively, the new interior is drum tight and rattle-free, a big improvement over old. So, I think it's a stretch calling the new car a failure. Again, it's not perfect...it's big/heavy, certain interior design elements need attention, performance is only good, not great and visibility is poor, but the new Camaro is no disgrace, IMO. It's a significant improvement over old. My $0.02 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
My $0.02 :tup: |
It looks so weird without a STB.
|
Quote:
It gained 300#. Fail. The LS1 brakes were pretty good. 60-0 in 117' with the tires of the time. Acceleration is unchanged. IRS is good. I think the old Trans Am looks better than the new Camaro, while the Z28<new SS, the old SS looked better. Looks are subjective, though. Yes, over-all quality is definitely up. Still, GM has made every generation Camaro MUCH faster (LS1>LT1>350TPI) This one LS3=LS1 given the platform differences. I don't think that's good. Still, I concede a lot of your points. Mainly in the QC dept. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2