370z challenger srt8

jetguy · 09-01-2010, 05:05 PM

a little birdie told me that a 370z can pull on a challenger srt8 from 100 to 140

klubbheads · 09-01-2010, 05:09 PM

not a big surprise..... Z is pretty slipery at high speeds along with G35/37s.

Jeffblue · 09-01-2010, 05:11 PM

how did you race a boat on land?

90 ST · 09-01-2010, 05:28 PM

Spec wise it should be faster...

lemansz20 · 09-01-2010, 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeffblue

how did you race a boat on land?

Oh the laughter, that is awesome. Truly I would like to know?

Auston · 09-01-2010, 06:06 PM

Challenger srt8s have only .2 seconds faster than the 370Z 0-60, pretty much a driver's race straight line

One_Quick_Z · 09-01-2010, 07:15 PM

Yup those and the Chargers are easy targets at the track, I killed Both R/T versions and a SRT at Byron Raceway last fall

DAN

Chris_1 · 09-01-2010, 07:55 PM

Such nice looking cars in my opinion, and great motors. They just need to hop on the wagon and realize that the style works, but the weight does not.

fullmonty · 09-01-2010, 10:46 PM

Challengers look pretty but fail at driving. Thus the reason I bought the Z

Cmike2780 · 09-01-2010, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fullmonty

Challengers look pretty but fail at driving. Thus the reason I bought the Z

Pretty on the outside, the interior looks like poop!

Cjanik · 09-01-2010, 10:58 PM

how come nobody can make a perfect car?

its either perfectly balanced but underpowered or vise versa.

when its got both, its 80k+ bucks.

resopaton · 09-02-2010, 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fullmonty

Challengers look pretty but fail at driving. Thus the reason I bought the Z

That's one of the main reasons I also bought the Z. The challenger is easy on the eyes but wasn't as fun to drive. Although, someday if I were to ad another car to the garage (in the same price range) it might be the challenger...hmmm, maybe a GT500...

Milenko2121 · 09-02-2010, 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cjanik

how come nobody can make a perfect car?

its either perfectly balanced but underpowered or vise versa.

when its got both, its 80k+ bucks.

or just buy a Z :P

90 ST · 09-02-2010, 12:52 AM

Yep the weight kills it, i was going to go with a Camaro SS, but the car is so heavy considering.

TheWeatherman · 09-02-2010, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 90 ST

Yep the weight kills it, i was going to go with a Camaro SS, but the car is so heavy considering.

The Challenger/300C/Charger SRT8 people laugh at cars like ours if we'd have the unfortunate occurrence of getting in an accident. Hey, different strokes, right? Wait until they get their new 6.4L for the 2011/2012 with the 8-speed ZF. Bye!

I still love the Challenger ads.

09-01-2010, 05:05 PM	#1 (permalink)
jetguy Enthusiast Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: atlanta Posts: 311 Drives: 370z Rep Power: 15	370z challenger srt8 a little birdie told me that a 370z can pull on a challenger srt8 from 100 to 140

09-01-2010, 05:09 PM	#2 (permalink)
klubbheads Base Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: North Hollywood, CA Posts: 221 Drives: Very slow Nismo 370 Rep Power: 16	not a big surprise..... Z is pretty slipery at high speeds along with G35/37s. __________________ g35driver OG.

09-01-2010, 07:15 PM	#7 (permalink)
One_Quick_Z A True Z Fanatic Join Date: May 2009 Location: Seneca Il Posts: 1,374 Drives: 10 Civic EX Sedan Rep Power: 218	Yup those and the Chargers are easy targets at the track, I killed Both R/T versions and a SRT at Byron Raceway last fall DAN __________________ -My BRZ with exhaust will decimate all if we overnight parts from Japan- 10 Civic EX Sedan- Current Daily

09-01-2010, 10:46 PM	#9 (permalink)
fullmonty A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Dirty Jersey Posts: 7,762 Drives: 370 Touring/Sport Rep Power: 33	Challengers look pretty but fail at driving. Thus the reason I bought the Z __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
From a Challenger SRT to a Z	XYZZZZZ	Member's 370Z Gallery	19	01-27-2010 07:06 PM
Nissan GT-R vs. New Challenger	Mercennarius	Other Vehicles	12	09-26-2009 06:28 PM
2009 SRT8 Challenger Vs. 2009 370Z Sport	92GTA	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	37	03-17-2009 07:49 PM
Dodge Challenger crash test	CSXJoe	The Lounge (Off Topic)	9	02-25-2009 10:20 AM
Anyone consider Jeep SRT8?	sbkim	Other Vehicles	3	02-17-2009 06:43 PM

09-01-2010, 05:11 PM	#3 (permalink)
Jeffblue A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: NY Age: 36 Posts: 9,192 Drives: Z32TT & 335xi Coupe Rep Power: 37	how did you race a boat on land?

09-01-2010, 05:28 PM	#4 (permalink)
90 ST A True Z Fanatic Join Date: May 2010 Location: Calgary Posts: 1,861 Drives: 90 and 15 GMC Sierra Rep Power: 420	Spec wise it should be faster...

09-01-2010, 06:06 PM	#6 (permalink)
Auston Track Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 764 Drives: 2009 Z34 T+S RAE Rep Power: 16	Challenger srt8s have only .2 seconds faster than the 370Z 0-60, pretty much a driver's race straight line

09-01-2010, 07:55 PM	#8 (permalink)
Chris_1 Track Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Statewide Posts: 838 Drives: Nissan 370Z Roadster Rep Power: 16	Such nice looking cars in my opinion, and great motors. They just need to hop on the wagon and realize that the style works, but the weight does not.

09-01-2010, 10:58 PM	#11 (permalink)
Cjanik Track Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 578 Drives: N/A Rep Power: 16	how come nobody can make a perfect car? its either perfectly balanced but underpowered or vise versa. when its got both, its 80k+ bucks.

09-02-2010, 12:52 AM	#14 (permalink)
90 ST A True Z Fanatic Join Date: May 2010 Location: Calgary Posts: 1,861 Drives: 90 and 15 GMC Sierra Rep Power: 420	Yep the weight kills it, i was going to go with a Camaro SS, but the car is so heavy considering.