![]() |
I owned an 06 S2000 for about 4 years before buying the Z. For power, right now, s2000 builds in the 400-500whp range are very reliable. It took about 8
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 140
Drives: 370Z
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
I owned an 06 S2000 for about 4 years before buying the Z.
For power, right now, s2000 builds in the 400-500whp range are very reliable. It took about 8 years to get there. The S2000 was built in 1999, and it's had all that time for people to figure out the builds and get them working. The S is also more nimble. It has a lot less rotational inertia due to better mass management--not just the weight difference. It was extremely well engineered. The top goes down in about 6 seconds at a stoplight--no tonneau cover is needed. The S2000 is a more raw drivers car. The 370z is a much better DD. The Z actually has torque in stock form. I feel the Z has better grip assuming tires are equal. The Nismo turns heads here while the S didn't, and I like the size of the Z better. The Z is a much faster car in nearly any situation. Both are great cars. The S was ahead of it's time and legendary in it's day, but that was admittedly about 15 years ago. It's still a great car, and I really enjoyed mine. And I'm glad I upgraded to the Z. |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The 370Z vs. the Honda S2000 | avitech | New 370Z Owner | 37 | 06-02-2010 06:39 AM |
| Deciding what car to get | Andrew62 | Introduction | 13 | 07-27-2009 09:23 AM |
| Best Motoring Brake Test: 370Z vs 135i vs S2000 vs Cayman S | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 10 | 03-20-2009 03:51 PM |
| S2000 owner, just admiring the new 370z | RayYay | New 370Z Owner | 23 | 03-20-2009 09:29 AM |
| Best Motoring 370Z Accelaration 0-400m vs 135i vs S2000 | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 10 | 02-10-2009 06:44 PM |