Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Member's 370Z Gallery (http://www.the370z.com/members-370z-gallery/)
-   -   SPOHN'S Journal II Track Demon Reborn (http://www.the370z.com/members-370z-gallery/59333-spohns-journal-ii-track-demon-reborn.html)

SPOHN 06-25-2013 08:14 PM

Thanks

Carbon_z 06-25-2013 09:13 PM

you know it... BTW I still need to flush my tranny fluid hahah

synolimit 06-25-2013 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPOHN (Post 2374879)
After discussions with Sam at GTM there is absolutely nothing wrong with putting filters on the intake side and leaving the others side completely vented to atmosphere and using no catch can at all. That's my plan. Maybe put filters on them so nothing can go in the holes.

I've never known a race track that will allow this during tech inspection. If the motor blows oil has a direct line out of the motor and onto the track and your headers. I've only known OEM setups with a catch can not vented to atmos to be legal. If the motor goes everything's contained and will run through the motor and crop dust everyone as you blow smoke out the tail pipe. At least then the oils had a chance to burn up a little. Yes throwing a rod out the block will contain no oil but that's if it happens and un-foreseeable. Yes I also know that's not the normal flow of air when hooked up but a blown motor can change the dynamics of the flow. I personally wouldn't run anything to atmos on the track. On the street I do.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Kingbaby (Post 2374559)
Yea...I capped off the bridge on the crankcase, and the one on the driver side. Keep the one on the passenger side going to the back of the intake manifold.

thought?

EDIT:

I'm NA

Pic?



Quote:

Originally Posted by Sh0velMan (Post 2374722)
Air doesn't blow out of the outlet though, you have to put vacuum on it to draw it out.

That's why I said you'll run lean unless you plan on installing an electric vacuum pump to evacuate the crankcase.

I've tested this on my own car and confirmed that without vacuum on the PCV outlet, no air passes through the crankcase (other than blowby).

On other cars I've let it just come out if it needed to; vented to atmos, never had issues. I do think you'd run lean though "if" it were still attached to the manifold because it'd be drawing in unmetered air.

Quote:

Originally Posted by wstar (Post 2374853)

Running breathers on the intake side as pictured is fine, IMHO. It's really not much functional difference from the stock configuration where the intake air filters play the role of that breather (and as a bonus - sometimes there is flow reversal and/or backfire through that line - at least that won't be going into your intake). But on the other side, you should hook up vacuum through a catch can. This will actively draw negative pressure on the crankcase and keep fresh air coming in through the breathers to replace it. If you were to vent the catch can to air and cap off the vacuum, the catch can won't really do anything (you might as well be venting both sides to air as above).

Except the MAF sensor already accounted for the air brought in through the real air filters. That's not fine as pictured because the manifold will now bring in air into the motor from two (4 total) different locations. One metered, one not. Only way it will work is a 100% capped off system letting the pcv's just open from pressure building up behind them, or OEM with a OCC. as stated though, Its not track legal to just let crank pressure blow out to atmos. Oil on the track or headers if the motor goes = burned alive.

synolimit 06-25-2013 11:45 PM

The yaw sensor has no bearing on drag racing correct? Must be a lateral force yes?

Sh0velMan 06-26-2013 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by synolimit (Post 2379909)
The yaw sensor has no bearing on drag racing correct? Must be a lateral force yes?






Yes, but disconnecting or disabling the sensor will disable VDC completely, and cripple the non-LSD cars even more.

Sh0velMan 06-26-2013 07:13 AM

I just want to say one last time that if you put breather filters on all four PCV connections, you will have no more positive crankcase ventilation.

Your crankcase will be ventilated, of course, and any pressure build up due to blow by will be relieved, but fuel and water vapor will condense inside your crankcase every time the engine cools and nothing will forcibly remove those vapors while the engine is warming up. PCV exists for reasons other than just emissions, it keeps potentially corrosive vapors from collecting inside your crankcase.

Sam is absolutely correct that it will not hurt anything short term, but think about what is going on inside there over the course of a year or more. Water and gasoline sitting on parts that were never meant to have water and gasoline sitting on them.

I just really think it's foolish to do the "elimination" when you gain absolutely nothing by doing it and cause a vulnerability in the process. Last I'll say on it, I promise.

:tup:

Quote:

Originally Posted by synolimit (Post 2379845)
I've never known a race track that will allow this during tech inspection. If the motor blows oil has a direct line out of the motor and onto the track and your headers. I've only known OEM setups with a catch can not vented to atmos to be legal. If the motor goes everything's contained and will run through the motor and crop dust everyone as you blow smoke out the tail pipe. At least then the oils had a chance to burn up a little. Yes throwing a rod out the block will contain no oil but that's if it happens and un-foreseeable. Yes I also know that's not the normal flow of air when hooked up but a blown motor can change the dynamics of the flow. I personally wouldn't run anything to atmos on the track. On the street I do.




Pic?





On other cars I've let it just come out if it needed to; vented to atmos, never had issues. I do think you'd run lean though "if" it were still attached to the manifold because it'd be drawing in unmetered air.



Except the MAF sensor already accounted for the air brought in through the real air filters. That's not fine as pictured because the manifold will now bring in air into the motor from two (4 total) different locations. One metered, one not. Only way it will work is a 100% capped off system letting the pcv's just open from pressure building up behind them, or OEM with a OCC. as stated though, Its not track legal to just let crank pressure blow out to atmos. Oil on the track or headers if the motor goes = burned alive.


synolimit 06-26-2013 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sh0velMan (Post 2380032)
Yes, but disconnecting or disabling the sensor will disable VDC completely, and cripple the non-LSD cars even more.

so even for drag racing it isnt a bad idea then? and i dont always have to push the damn button?

synolimit 06-26-2013 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sh0velMan (Post 2380046)
I just want to say one last time that if you put breather filters on all four PCV connections, you will have no more positive crankcase ventilation.

Your crankcase will be ventilated, of course, and any pressure build up due to blow by will be relieved, but fuel and water vapor will condense inside your crankcase every time the engine cools and nothing will forcibly remove those vapors while the engine is warming up. PCV exists for reasons other than just emissions, it keeps potentially corrosive vapors from collecting inside your crankcase.

Sam is absolutely correct that it will not hurt anything short term, but think about what is going on inside there over the course of a year or more. Water and gasoline sitting on parts that were never meant to have water and gasoline sitting on them.

I just really think it's foolish to do the "elimination" when you gain absolutely nothing by doing it and cause a vulnerability in the process. Last I'll say on it, I promise.

:tup:

ok than what if you blocked off the rear valve location completely? and left the PCV in place? this way nothing can enter from the rear and when the car is off the PCV is in a closed postition. so nothing can enter in and when enough pressure has build up when running it will force the valve in the PCV to open and vent blow by pressure. i sucked on the valve, it takes no suction at all to open it so blow by pressure would have no issue opening the valve and venting to atmos or a OCC.

Red__Zed 06-26-2013 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sh0velMan (Post 2380046)
I just want to say one last time that if you put breather filters on all four PCV connections, you will have no more positive crankcase ventilation.

Your crankcase will be ventilated, of course, and any pressure build up due to blow by will be relieved, but fuel and water vapor will condense inside your crankcase every time the engine cools and nothing will forcibly remove those vapors while the engine is warming up. PCV exists for reasons other than just emissions, it keeps potentially corrosive vapors from collecting inside your crankcase.

Sam is absolutely correct that it will not hurt anything short term, but think about what is going on inside there over the course of a year or more. Water and gasoline sitting on parts that were never meant to have water and gasoline sitting on them.

I just really think it's foolish to do the "elimination" when you gain absolutely nothing by doing it and cause a vulnerability in the process. Last I'll say on it, I promise.

:tup:



With FI it's probably smarter to eliminate it than to leave it. You're looking at a very different engine ecosystem with boost.

http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e3.../2pqvz7n-1.jpg

Sh0velMan 06-26-2013 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 2380572)
With FI it's probably smarter to eliminate it than to leave it. You're looking at a very different engine ecosystem with boost.

I don't see how.

Every factory FI car I've owned had it, worked fine. Difference all of those systems are draw-through rather than blow-through.

As Syno has pointed out, the valve closes so as not to allow pressure into the crankcase. Under boost, no evacuation occurs, this is normal. Off boost, the system works as previously. We're talking about 8-9 PSI at most on the stock bottom end, so the boost pressure isn't likely to destroy the PCV valve.

I can see how you'd pretty much have to run breather filters though, otherwise the inlet ends up being on the cold pipe (and thus pressurized) since we run blow-through FI on these cars. I can tell you from testing that the car will adjust the idle air bypass to adjust for what is essentially a vacuum leak if you run the PCV vacuum without having it plumbed to the intake tube.

With proper tuning, it could probably be made to work fine, so that's my suggestion:

Breather on inlet, outlet to manifold, drivability tuning to account for the more or less static rate of flow through the PCV system off boost. Static meaning the orifice is always the same size, so you can adjust for it easily. You'll get the good evacuation without the risk of boost pressure causing issues in the crankcase. Win/win.

Sh0velMan 06-26-2013 12:25 PM

Also, in case you're trying to suggest that not having a way for backpressure from blow-by to be relieved while under boost is going to cause issues... I really think that's taking it a bit too far.

It's the same conundrum you're in with a vacuum operated brake booster. Eventually you have to go back into vacuum briefly, or **** stops working. Same deal here. I'd bet you'd need to be in boost for several minutes without a single swing into vacuum for it to even become an issue.

Edit: OH lmao, and, if it got really bad, the pressure would escape the breather inlet anyway, as that isn't valved. So there you go, pressure can't really build up anyway. At least having the outlet plumbed to vacuum means you get a good purge of the crankcase every time you go into vacuum.

Red__Zed 06-26-2013 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sh0velMan (Post 2380598)
Also, in case you're trying to suggest that not having a way for backpressure from blow-by to be relieved while under boost is going to cause issues... I really think that's taking it a bit too far.

It's the same conundrum you're in with a vacuum operated brake booster. Eventually you have to go back into vacuum briefly, or **** stops working. Same deal here. I'd bet you'd need to be in boost for several minutes without a single swing into vacuum for it to even become an issue.

Edit: OH lmao, and, if it got really bad, the pressure would escape the breather inlet anyway, as that isn't valved. So there you go, pressure can't really build up anyway. At least having the outlet plumbed to vacuum means you get a good purge of the crankcase every time you go into vacuum.

You get the same purge everytime you go into boost, as the crankcase is positive relative to atmosphere, with none of the pressure build up while under boost (which can actually be rather substantial).

I've not messed with this on a VHR, but just offering my opinion from the bit of experience I have with FI.


You can go pre-impeller and probably get something working, but that likely gets you into other issues.

synolimit 06-26-2013 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sh0velMan (Post 2380598)
Also, in case you're trying to suggest that not having a way for backpressure from blow-by to be relieved while under boost is going to cause issues... I really think that's taking it a bit too far.

It's the same conundrum you're in with a vacuum operated brake booster. Eventually you have to go back into vacuum briefly, or **** stops working. Same deal here. I'd bet you'd need to be in boost for several minutes without a single swing into vacuum for it to even become an issue.

Edit: OH lmao, and, if it got really bad, the pressure would escape the breather inlet anyway, as that isn't valved. So there you go, pressure can't really build up anyway. At least having the outlet plumbed to vacuum means you get a good purge of the crankcase every time you go into vacuum.

Yeah it's not an issue. My subi ran the valve covers and crank vent to a AOS that vented to atmos. No PCV and manifold blocked off where it was running. Car ran 23psi without issue. Also what I loved was the valves and crank ran into the AOS, but the bottom of the AOS Tee'd back into the crank vent line so under boost whatever came out of the valves or crank, under vacuum it would all get drained right back into the block. This is how Crawford runs their AOS too on ken blocks car. This way its 100% maintance free and during a long race you lose no oil as a OCC will fill up leaving the motor with less in it.

Red__Zed 06-26-2013 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by synolimit (Post 2380628)
Yeah it's not an issue. My subi ran the valve covers and crank vent to a AOS that vented to atmos. No PCV and manifold blocked off where it was running. Car ran 23psi without issue. Also what I loved was the valves and crank ran into the AOS, but the bottom of the AOS Tee'd back into the crank vent line so under boost whatever came out of the valves or crank, under vacuum it would all get drained right back into the block. This is how Crawford runs their AOS too on ken blocks car. This way its 100% maintance free and during a long race you lose no oil as a OCC will fill up leaving the motor with less in it.

The EJs are a completely different animal than the VQ.

Sh0velMan 06-26-2013 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 2380621)
You get the same purge everytime you go into boost, as the crankcase is positive relative to atmosphere, with none of the pressure build up while under boost (which can actually be rather substantial).

I've not messed with this on a VHR, but just offering my opinion from the bit of experience I have with FI.


You can go pre-impeller and probably get something working, but that likely gets you into other issues.

It's only positive relative to atmosphere if there is, in fact, substantial blow-by. This engine is not like older examples where there is a mechanism at work pressurizing the crankcase with intake manifold air so that all you need is a single vent, it requires vacuum from the manifold to draw out said air. Without that vacuum, there is no evacuation of the crankcase, as I've said over and over.

And as I addressed in my reply, any true pressure buildup would exit via the breather, so that's a non issue.

synolimit 06-26-2013 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 2380635)
The EJs are a completely different animal than the VQ.

PCV and crank vents work no different though :tup:

Red__Zed 06-26-2013 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sh0velMan (Post 2380636)
It's only positive relative to atmosphere if there is, in fact, substantial blow-by. This engine is not like older examples where there is a mechanism at work pressurizing the crankcase with intake manifold air so that all you need is a single vent, it requires vacuum from the manifold to draw out said air. Without that vacuum, there is no evacuation of the crankcase, as I've said over and over.

And as I addressed in my reply, any true pressure buildup would exit via the breather, so that's a non issue.

If you logged pressure in a VQ crankcase over boost, I bet you'd be surprised.

Here's one for you:

Crankcase Ventilation Mod w/Pics - Page 18 - MY350Z.COM Forums

Red__Zed 06-26-2013 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by synolimit (Post 2380642)
PCV and crank vents work no different though :tup:

but the system they are connected to is designed to be operated differently

Sh0velMan 06-26-2013 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 2380644)
If you logged pressure in a VQ crankcase over boost, I bet you'd be surprised.

Here's one for you:

Crankcase Ventilation Mod w/Pics - Page 18 - MY350Z.COM Forums

Wow, 15psi got him a 1.5psi crankcase pressurization.. that's loose as hell.

Red__Zed 06-26-2013 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sh0velMan (Post 2380650)
Wow, 15psi got him a 1.5psi crankcase pressurization.. that's loose as hell.

with a drilled out PCV...

synolimit 06-26-2013 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 2380646)
but the system they are connected to is designed to be operated differently

Not really. Bottom end of PCV goes to crank vent, other end has a hose running to manifold. Actually they're 100% the same as with every PCV system. When in wot the PCV closes so no air can enter the crank.

Red__Zed 06-26-2013 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by synolimit (Post 2380657)
Not really. Bottom end of PCV goes to crank vent, other end has a hose running to manifold. Actually they're 100% the same as with every PCV system.

The boost to crankcase pressure curves look vastly different between the motors.

synolimit 06-26-2013 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 2380659)
The boost to crankcase pressure curves look vastly different between the motors.

How? If the PCV is closed, boost can't get into the block and I thought that's all we're talking about. Only other way is piston rings and I don't think that'd be to different. Your motors rings seal or they don't.

wstar 06-26-2013 01:17 PM

Piston rings are never a perfect seal. That's how we get blow-by in the first place. It stands to reason that with boost coming into the pistons, a whole lot more blow-by will happen.

Red__Zed 06-26-2013 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wstar (Post 2380702)
Piston rings are never a perfect seal. That's how we get blow-by in the first place. It stands to reason that with boost coming into the pistons, a whole lot more blow-by will happen.

Yep.

SPOHN 06-30-2013 01:32 PM

First firewall shaved. Rough pics posted here. I ended up cleaning it up with smoother cuts and grinded down. Hopefully this will allow heat to escape/ flow rather than trap it in that particular area along with the cowl removed and my vented hood. Also removed my windshield wipers

http://i1109.photobucket.com/albums/...ps733fa2b1.jpg


http://i1109.photobucket.com/albums/...ps1d6e8567.jpg

http://i1109.photobucket.com/albums/...ps0ee25876.jpg

http://i1109.photobucket.com/albums/...psbbf27c67.jpg

Also have begun mounting wind splitter to frame

http://i1109.photobucket.com/albums/...psf3893053.jpg

http://i1109.photobucket.com/albums/...ps625ce16e.jpg

Dzel 06-30-2013 02:00 PM

Looking good! Did you do all the work yourself?

Sent with TapAhoe

SPOHN 06-30-2013 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dzel (Post 2386281)
Looking good! Did you do all the work yourself?

Sent with TapAhoe

Sure did. I do all my own work.

HKYStormFront 06-30-2013 02:17 PM

can't wait to see this all done chris!

Baer383 06-30-2013 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPOHN (Post 2386285)
Sure did. I do all my own work.

:vuvuzela2:

Baer383 06-30-2013 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPOHN (Post 2386285)
Sure did. I do all my own work.

And I made a PBJ sandwich for lunch.;)

SPOHN 06-30-2013 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baer383 (Post 2386309)
And I made a PBJ sandwich for lunch.;)

Don't lie. You know your wife did.

Dzel 06-30-2013 03:29 PM

Lol Baer are you "that" guy that just stands ghere and watches while everyone else works?

Sent with TapAhoe

Baer383 06-30-2013 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dzel (Post 2386341)
Lol Baer are you "that" guy that just stands ghere and watches while everyone else works?

Sent with TapAhoe

I've been working on cars for 28yrs it's about time I can watch.:hello:

Dzel 06-30-2013 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baer383 (Post 2386346)
I've been working on cars for 28yrs it's about time I can watch.:hello:

Lmao here we go again!

Sent with TapAhoe

docaam 07-01-2013 01:02 AM

Looking good and hats off for doing it yourself, here we cant stand in the heat for an hour outside lol

Kingbaby 07-01-2013 02:22 AM

Awesome stuff man... A vent like the BMW guys have near the windshield would be functional?

Nismo RS style vents for air in and a BMW/Aston Martin vent for air out...

Kingbaby 07-02-2013 02:25 AM

http://i.imgur.com/30wLOFw.jpg

SPOHN 07-02-2013 05:01 AM

You trying to give me more ideas? Lol. I like it.

theDreamer 07-02-2013 07:32 AM

But since he has a vented hood (and not solid until the windshield) will this alter the flow through of air?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2