O&G's Journal

O&G

Chuck....JTRANS mustang has been repaired and calibrated so its producing more accurate numbers now. However he us still going to get rid of it and upgrade to something newer and that takes up less space....most likely a dynojet...but yes I will take it over to another friend who has a dynojet down thwart street!

sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note

__________________
O&G's Build/Journal <---(1st lowmount single turbo treeseventy)
Built Engine Thread
2011 F-250 Build/Journal

Chuck33079

Ok, because his old one was a heartbreaker. His and Kosmic's mustangs just made you feel bad. I know it's just a tuning tool, but numbers that low just ruin your day.

__________________
2011 MB Touring-Sport-6sp-Nav/GTM TT/FI TT TDX/JTran/Kosmic/Eibach/Hotchkis/SPC/CSF/RPS/SoThatsWhereAllMyMoneyWent

jwick

The numbers must not be linear when it comes to dyno readings between boosted and NA cars. I can tell you that I put down almost identical numbers on Powerfabs Dynojet as I did on JTrans Mustang. NA was 306whp DJ and 311whp Mustang (yes I put down higher numbers on the Mustang at JTrans). Numbers that close are likely just differences in conditions.

Pre-UpRev my numbers were 299whp at both locations.

__________________
'10 G37T 6MT Graphite/Graphite - BP - G37T Build

O&G

How long ago was this?

sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note

__________________
O&G's Build/Journal <---(1st lowmount single turbo treeseventy)
Built Engine Thread
2011 F-250 Build/Journal

jwick

I'd have to look at the date stamp on the map file but I want to say beginning of 2012. You were there that day as we went for a spin in your Z but I've had way too much bourbon since then to remember exactly how long ago.

__________________
'10 G37T 6MT Graphite/Graphite - BP - G37T Build