Anyone here into firearms?

VABAM · 06-08-2021, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rusty

I've read that.

I've been reading through the proposal. The article is a little misleading and missing facts. Like the 13.5" thing is referring to length of pull not OAL. Also the 2 determination points against red dots isn't red dots by themselves but red dots with magnifiers because they have limited eye relief. Basically any sights, magnifiers, scopes, etc. that have limited eye relief, that can't be used at arm length are points against the weapon when determining if it is a SBR or Pistol. That's why BUIS are a dink against the weapon too because they think BUIS or any rifle sights can't be used at arm length. I kind of see ATF's point about sights that encourages or requires "shouldering" the weapon for proper use but I say how about we repeal the NFA. It's dated and not to mention racist and classist in origin.

Ghostvette · 06-09-2021, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VABAM

I've been reading through the proposal. The article is a little misleading and missing facts. Like the 13.5" thing is referring to length of pull not OAL. Also the 2 determination points against red dots isn't red dots by themselves but red dots with magnifiers because they have limited eye relief. Basically any sights, magnifiers, scopes, etc. that have limited eye relief, that can't be used at arm length are points against the weapon when determining if it is a SBR or Pistol. That's why BUIS are a dink against the weapon too because they think BUIS or any rifle sights can't be used at arm length. I kind of see ATF's point about sights that encourages or requires "shouldering" the weapon for proper use but I say how about we repeal the NFA. It's dated and not to mention racist and classist in origin.

Any law that violates the Constitution is unconstitutional. The $200 'transfer tax' is essentially a 'tax to exercise a right', aka a poll tax. The poll tax was struck down by SCOTUS as unconstitutional.