|
Originally Posted by Rooster89 I don't like DI rifles because the obvious shortcomings are important to me. What "obvious shortcomings" do you perceive in direct impingement rifles? "higher maintenance"? It
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
01-09-2012, 06:04 PM
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,349
Drives: 370Z PW 2014
Rep Power: 17  |
Quote:
"higher maintenance"? It will give you something to do while you're hunkered in your bunker. eta: Relative to the SCAR...I think one of the best discourses on the platform can be found here: http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=62889 / Last edited by MacCool; 01-09-2012 at 06:41 PM. |
|
|
|
|
01-09-2012, 07:48 PM
|
#2 (permalink) | ||
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: here
Posts: 4,976
Drives: fast
Rep Power: 45  |
Quote:
Thank you for the link, that is exactly what I was looking for. If only this guy did an ar10/scar17 comparison. If I went Scar, i would go 7.62 because i know for sure that this 17 isn't going anywhere since the navy had fn cancel the 16 and make 17s. But overall thanks, this comparison is exactly why i came to this thread. looking for something that google doesn't seem to want to help me with. 
__________________
OG3 Diligentia Vis Celeritas Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
01-10-2012, 05:07 AM
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,349
Drives: 370Z PW 2014
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
3387Likes
Hybrid Mode
