Nissan 370Z Forum  

GTM Supercharger Stage 1 w/ F.I. LTH

Originally Posted by glory Sorry to be reviving this old thread but I came across is it and I think I am missing something here. My dilemma is here is

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z Tech Area > Engine & Drivetrain > Forced Induction


Like Tree9Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-07-2012, 09:45 AM   #1 (permalink)
The370Z.com Sponsor
 
F.I. Inc.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 2,989
Drives: 2010 GT-R/2007 F-250
Rep Power: 687
F.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond reputeF.I. Inc. has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glory View Post
Sorry to be reviving this old thread but I came across is it and I think I am missing something here.

My dilemma is here is why Dreamer is making less power with LTH's. I understand boost = back pressure so freeing up the exhaust (CBE +LTH) will lower the back pressure (and therefore the boost) and make it more efficient, but shouldn't he be making more power @8psi rather than less?



Now is it because the SC is capped @ 8psi that it can't achieve higher numbers or is it some VVEL thing holding it back?

Sorry, not trying to stir the pot just trying to wrap my head around this.

Thanks
Mike@GTM answered this well!

There is nothing wrong with our headers or exhaust. In an N/A application they have big gains across the board...

I do not want to stir the pot as well but the stage I kit is inefficient! I am glad to see GTM finally is making a bigger more efficient kit that can support less back pressure.

I do not think that our headers will fit with the stage 1.5 kit though. I have not seen the kit first hand but I have been told that with the new design, there is no room for our headers!

Thanks, Tony
__________________
Follow us on Facebook: Fast Intentions Inc.
Phone: (805) 522-FAST (3278)
Email: tony@fastintentions.com
www.fastintentions.com
"FUELED BY PASSION"
F.I. Inc. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 05:01 PM   #2 (permalink)
Not an active Vendor. DO NOT BUY
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California
Posts: 391
Drives: '13 Hot Lava FR-S
Rep Power: 18
Mike@GTM is a splendid one to beholdMike@GTM is a splendid one to beholdMike@GTM is a splendid one to beholdMike@GTM is a splendid one to beholdMike@GTM is a splendid one to beholdMike@GTM is a splendid one to beholdMike@GTM is a splendid one to beholdMike@GTM is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by F.I. Inc. View Post
Mike@GTM answered this well!

There is nothing wrong with our headers or exhaust. In an N/A application they have big gains across the board...

I do not want to stir the pot as well but the stage I kit is inefficient! I am glad to see GTM finally is making a bigger more efficient kit that can support less back pressure.

I do not think that our headers will fit with the stage 1.5 kit though. I have not seen the kit first hand but I have been told that with the new design, there is no room for our headers!

Thanks, Tony
Mmmm...I wouldn't call the Stage 1 "inefficient". See, there's always a trade off, as you should know. Bigger is not always better.

In fact, there are a lot of subtleties involved with designing a forced induction system. It's not as simple as just tossing a turbo or supercharger on a motor and getting good results. There is an thread on here that exemplifies what can happen with that mentality.

The Stage 1 kit (much like a small turbo), has superb mid-range torque for a centrifugal supercharger. The Stage 1.5 (like a mid sized turbo), gets to full song a little later than the Stage 1, but still quicker than Stage 2 (like a large turbo).

Each one of our stages has its place depending on what the end user is doing with their car. No one stage is going to be the best for every circumstance. Flatly calling our Stage 1 inefficient just illustrates that not everyone fully understands how forced induction really works.
Mike@GTM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 05:55 PM   #3 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Nixlimited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,235
Drives: 15 GT-R / 11 Prius
Rep Power: 27
Nixlimited has a reputation beyond reputeNixlimited has a reputation beyond reputeNixlimited has a reputation beyond reputeNixlimited has a reputation beyond reputeNixlimited has a reputation beyond reputeNixlimited has a reputation beyond reputeNixlimited has a reputation beyond reputeNixlimited has a reputation beyond reputeNixlimited has a reputation beyond reputeNixlimited has a reputation beyond reputeNixlimited has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike@GTM View Post
Mmmm...I wouldn't call the Stage 1 "inefficient". See, there's always a trade off, as you should know. Bigger is not always better.

In fact, there are a lot of subtleties involved with designing a forced induction system. It's not as simple as just tossing a turbo or supercharger on a motor and getting good results. There is an thread on here that exemplifies what can happen with that mentality.

The Stage 1 kit (much like a small turbo), has superb mid-range torque for a centrifugal supercharger. The Stage 1.5 (like a mid sized turbo), gets to full song a little later than the Stage 1, but still quicker than Stage 2 (like a large turbo).

Each one of our stages has its place depending on what the end user is doing with their car. No one stage is going to be the best for every circumstance. Flatly calling our Stage 1 inefficient just illustrates that not everyone fully understands how forced induction really works.
If it's the same compressor wheel with a different, more efficient, housing on the stage 1.5, why is it taking longer to come online?
__________________
Car Sold! Pleasure being a part of the Z community.
New ride: 2015 GT-R - 647 WHP / 641 WTQ (e85) & 543 WHP / 519 WTQ (91)
Nixlimited is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 06:05 PM   #4 (permalink)
Not an active Vendor. DO NOT BUY
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California
Posts: 391
Drives: '13 Hot Lava FR-S
Rep Power: 18
Mike@GTM is a splendid one to beholdMike@GTM is a splendid one to beholdMike@GTM is a splendid one to beholdMike@GTM is a splendid one to beholdMike@GTM is a splendid one to beholdMike@GTM is a splendid one to beholdMike@GTM is a splendid one to beholdMike@GTM is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nixlimited View Post
If it's the same compressor wheel with a different, more efficient, housing on the stage 1.5, why is it taking longer to come online?
It's a combination of pressure ratios and pulley size. Keep in mind that it is the same supercharger...all we're doing is shifting the pressure ratios.
Mike@GTM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GTM Performance Engineering Stage 1 Turn key Supercharger kit In house Installation. SAM@GTM Forced Induction 311 09-07-2011 03:42 AM
The Specialty-Z GTM Stage 2 Build Seb@SZ Forced Induction 62 12-12-2010 10:34 AM
GTM Performance Engineering Stage 1 Turn key Supercharger kit In house Install II. SAM@GTM Forced Induction 254 08-11-2010 10:59 AM
RGM Stage 1 (Need Some Help) alexpila Tuning 1 02-01-2010 11:09 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2