GTM Supercharger Stage 1 w/ F.I. LTH

Mike@GTM · 03-07-2012, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by F.I. Inc.

Mike@GTM answered this well!

There is nothing wrong with our headers or exhaust. In an N/A application they have big gains across the board...

I do not want to stir the pot as well but the stage I kit is inefficient! I am glad to see GTM finally is making a bigger more efficient kit that can support less back pressure.

I do not think that our headers will fit with the stage 1.5 kit though. I have not seen the kit first hand but I have been told that with the new design, there is no room for our headers!

Thanks, Tony

Mmmm...I wouldn't call the Stage 1 "inefficient". See, there's always a trade off, as you should know. Bigger is not always better.

In fact, there are a lot of subtleties involved with designing a forced induction system. It's not as simple as just tossing a turbo or supercharger on a motor and getting good results. There is an thread on here that exemplifies what can happen with that mentality.

The Stage 1 kit (much like a small turbo), has superb mid-range torque for a centrifugal supercharger. The Stage 1.5 (like a mid sized turbo), gets to full song a little later than the Stage 1, but still quicker than Stage 2 (like a large turbo).

Each one of our stages has its place depending on what the end user is doing with their car. No one stage is going to be the best for every circumstance. Flatly calling our Stage 1 inefficient just illustrates that not everyone fully understands how forced induction really works.

Nixlimited · 03-07-2012, 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike@GTM

Mmmm...I wouldn't call the Stage 1 "inefficient". See, there's always a trade off, as you should know. Bigger is not always better.

In fact, there are a lot of subtleties involved with designing a forced induction system. It's not as simple as just tossing a turbo or supercharger on a motor and getting good results. There is an thread on here that exemplifies what can happen with that mentality.

The Stage 1 kit (much like a small turbo), has superb mid-range torque for a centrifugal supercharger. The Stage 1.5 (like a mid sized turbo), gets to full song a little later than the Stage 1, but still quicker than Stage 2 (like a large turbo).

Each one of our stages has its place depending on what the end user is doing with their car. No one stage is going to be the best for every circumstance. Flatly calling our Stage 1 inefficient just illustrates that not everyone fully understands how forced induction really works.

If it's the same compressor wheel with a different, more efficient, housing on the stage 1.5, why is it taking longer to come online?

Mike@GTM · 03-07-2012, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nixlimited

If it's the same compressor wheel with a different, more efficient, housing on the stage 1.5, why is it taking longer to come online?

It's a combination of pressure ratios and pulley size. Keep in mind that it is the same supercharger...all we're doing is shifting the pressure ratios.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
GTM Performance Engineering Stage 1 Turn key Supercharger kit In house Installation.	SAM@GTM	Forced Induction	311	09-07-2011 03:42 AM
The Specialty-Z GTM Stage 2 Build	Seb@SZ	Forced Induction	62	12-12-2010 10:34 AM
GTM Performance Engineering Stage 1 Turn key Supercharger kit In house Install II.	SAM@GTM	Forced Induction	254	08-11-2010 10:59 AM
RGM Stage 1 (Need Some Help)	alexpila	Tuning	1	02-01-2010 11:09 AM