![]() |
Do you offer installation and tuning services?
|
Quote:
We do have a Remote tuning option on the website. |
Are there any limitations to remote tuning? Like would there be any benefit to tuning in person, or would remote tuning give you the full utility
|
I am interested in this kit, but mostly concerned about getting a bad installation and tune.
I am in washington, and could drive over to minneapolis for install and tune to make sure it's done right Would feel better knowing it's been setup by the guy who built the kit |
Quote:
Also some tuners have access to a dyno, which is a safer way to tune high performance vehicles. Not exactly smart to try and do 5th gear redline pulls on public roads :ugh: although you shouldn't need that log for tuning anyway. |
As far as remote tuning goes, I paid for remote tuning by Sebastian, and the installer was familiar with Ecutek (although not a registered Ecutek tuner) and knows Sebastian personally. The installer said that the Ecutek software is not always intuitive, and if you've never done it before, is better to pay someone with tuning experience.
The installer I use races, and is an expert with forced induction engines. He said that tuning on a dyno gives an inferior result. Most of the time, the customer will never run into issues, but sometimes, it can be catastrophic...especially if you're pushing the envelope. He said open-road tuning gives infinitely-better data logs. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
OK, so I haven't updated my signature, and I haven't had a dyno run yet to post exact results. But Sebastian gave me a "beast mode" tune for ambient temps under 80F, that probably nets me in the neighborhood of 630hp to the wheels on 93 octane, maybe more. Redline is only in 5-10 seconds in 4th or 5th depending upon starting speed, and certainly less than a quarter mile. Seems to me you can easily find a suitable space on a safe road for a good open-throttle data log?
I hear you about your concerns, and perhaps circumstances are not the same if you live in a large metropolitan area. I'm only sharing what the tuner told me...your mileage may vary! |
Anyone experience near overheating on this kit?
I’ve had it on since November, and started running E85 somewhere in April; makes close to 700whp or more now. I had a run against a new GT500 and beat it uphill, but by the end of the run I was one dot away from overheating and was having a decent amount of white smoke coming out of my hood vents. The run maybe lasted forty-five seconds at full WOT. Car eventually cooled down but I almost thought I had something on fire until I noticed it was just whitish-grey smoke that eventually stopped. When I finally pulled over there was no spilled coolant, car went back to normal, and car has felt fine since. Did I experience head lift or something? I cant even begin to figure it out; I have no idea if overheating caused the white smoke or what. My knock sensors are on, all safety parameters are set, but car is basically at maximum send with the E85 power tune. Weirdest part? Car drives fine. It’s had numerous hard pulls and has been pushed a bit. No running or idling issues at all. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Weren't you over 17 for years? Your sig states 19.5 and I don't believe that was built. Just trying to normalize the data. |
Quote:
What psi was your rotrex build making when it lifted the heads? |
Quote:
There's lots of guys running 16 psi or more. Do the heads lift over time? I wouldn't think so. I'd imagine it's discrete. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1.) The open deck cylinders moving around wearing out the headgaskets which creates an appearance that the head is lifting due to the decrease in clamping force from the wear. 2.) Actual head lift where the cylinder pressure is greater than what can be held by headgasket, Head studds, etc. Both combined together is very unpredictable of what the actual cause was. That is why there are only 2 methods that are working at the moment. I made it 7k miles with mostly 17psi of boost before my first engine cut loose. That was an open deck block. I hope this makes sense. |
Quote:
|
The cylinders still moving around after an install of the RJM closed deck system has been confirmed. I am not going to mention any names because I don't have his permission to do so. It was confirmed the first of the year in 2020 when I was searching for a solution. I ask him to look.
I have seen someone do the following to try and get the headgaskets to hold with no success. RJM closed deck LA sleeves that protruded higher than the deck. How much I do not know. Headgasket, unknown. ARP 625 head studs Fire ringed head |
So in short, the problem is in the open deck block itself. There is an inherent defect that allows the cylinders to move under higher than stock cylinder pressure. Is what it is. Any more questions, just ask. I may or may not know the answers.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
You can't get the CSS or RJM closed deck's in tight enough to keep the cylinders from moving. They move. I knew that the first of 2020. The SOHO mod allows it to stay alive with the CSS system. RJM is a lost cause.
|
Boost Help Needed
2 Attachment(s)
Hey Guys,
When I first had my kit installed I was seeing 11-12 psi of boost on my gauge and now the max I get is 10 psi. Not sure if I have a boost leak or getting belt slip. I did notice belt residue on the hood. Not sure if that is normal or not. I had my first SC service at 2500 miles and they installed a new belt at that time. I have about 4000 miles on the kit since then. Any ideas or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks |
Quote:
|
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Yeah that's a TON of belt slip, especially considering you have that better tensioner position than I think most of us have.
I thought the ACE kit came with RPM belts but both of yours appears to be the non-RPM version. Did they downgrade the belts when they changed them or you have always had the non-RPM version? Edit: I just noticed the tensioner is in a different spot between the two pictures, why is that? What's the difference between the first and second pictures? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2