![]() |
I was just reporting the readings, and making a point that I wasn’t even selecting the highest one, since there was a lot of disbelief over my numbers. Having said
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Cary, NC
Age: 55
Posts: 425
Drives: 370SC,EliseSC,MR2T
Rep Power: 51 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I was just reporting the readings, and making a point that I wasn’t even selecting the highest one, since there was a lot of disbelief over my numbers. Having said that, Eugene says boost recorded by dynos are typically lower because they use a longer vacuum tube to reach their sensor. Vacuum loss over longer runs. I still hit high 14’s on the dyno I believe. I don’t understand why an unknown dyno with unknown sensors and vacuum tube length is somehow more believable or comparable than the equipment virtually everyone here owns. Probably a 4 bar OMNI-Power sensor, a couple feet of tube, and ECUTEK software. These are all constants, so why not rely on them instead of insisting on boost numbers from a dyno?
Last edited by Senna-F1; 01-28-2020 at 07:37 AM. |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NA or SUPERCHARGED | Janjua8 | Forced Induction | 18 | 04-21-2018 12:32 PM |
| 7AT going supercharged | triadz | Forced Induction | 12 | 02-13-2012 04:45 PM |