![]() |
This makes me wonder if ecutek is not reporting or receiving correct data. Bug? This makes no sense. If we saw AFRs drop below target, that would help with identifying
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Cary, NC
Age: 55
Posts: 425
Drives: 370SC,EliseSC,MR2T
Rep Power: 52 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This makes me wonder if ecutek is not reporting or receiving correct data. Bug? This makes no sense. If we saw AFRs drop below target, that would help with identifying such an issue. Something just not adding up.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
618 WHP.452 WTQ.4" Python Intake.15 psi.e50.Topgunz SC.SOHO Tune.S1SE.STG 4 Clutch.Motordyne LTH/Test Pipes/Exhaust.485 Pump.1050x |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Cary, NC
Age: 55
Posts: 425
Drives: 370SC,EliseSC,MR2T
Rep Power: 52 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
. But we went from having a conversation when I first showed up very much like you had, talking about lowering rev limit, getting 1300’s, to there now being no issue with moving ahead with e85. Raising fuel pressure alone this amount does not account for this dramatic of a drop in duty cycle according to what I’ve read. In fact when I was still working with Eugene, I went to the trouble to try and figure out what it would take to go e85 based on my high duty cycle, and came up with it would take 64.5 psi at idle. If raising fuel pressure to 50 alone was a fix for all my fuel troubles, I think Eugene would have simply asked me to raise fuel pressure and we would have done some pulls. So, I think there may be something in either the tune or in how duty cycle is being calculated that’s not quite right. And BTW, this was in the 550 WHP and 425 TQ range.
Last edited by Senna-F1; 01-21-2020 at 09:11 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Track Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 550
Drives: '11 SC Blue 7AT
Rep Power: 3368 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Without knowing the correlation between pressure and flow exactly, if they set your pressure to 50psi at idle, with the hoses connected, then they did raise your pressure. Roughly guessing, 50 at idle would correlate to near 60 at atmospheric. This would lead to a reduction in duty cycle, given the same injector size. There is only one thing that can change your duty cycle for a set AFR and injector. Injectors are set because you install them. The AFR piece is for your tuner to play with and is arguably set at a certain value for safety, so I consider this arguably not a variable. This leaves the variable to be pressure. After that comes the issue of the pump being able to support the flow. I have the CJM S1-SE fuel system with ID 1050x injectors from an Aeromotive 340lph pump with pressure set at 51psi at atmospheric pressure. Looking at my most recent logs, my injector duty is 51%, tuned on 93 octane, while around 11psi. EDIT: I uploaded a picture of a log to show where my car is at right now for the respective parameters. Last edited by turtle64b; 01-21-2020 at 12:28 PM. Reason: Upload Data Log |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GTM Stage 1.5 supercharger build | snowsurfdirtx | Forced Induction | 197 | 05-07-2017 06:04 AM |
| RiD3_FaM0uS's Journey to 850+whp Build Thread | Rid3_FaM0uS | Member's 370Z Gallery | 83 | 03-24-2017 05:06 PM |
| Fillerbunnie's GTM Stage 1 Supercharger build (Australian RHD) | fillerbunnie | Forced Induction | 46 | 08-23-2015 01:07 AM |
| 40th Stillen Supercharger Build | Nism0 | Forced Induction | 51 | 03-23-2015 08:12 PM |
| THE "Lets argue about Bullitt's build with out ruining Bullitt's build thread" THREAD | Reaper42 | Forced Induction | 14 | 01-22-2011 05:24 PM |