NA Power

carfr3ak · 09-25-2009, 05:04 PM

With all this forced induction talk, what about NA power, like stroker kits? Is this going to come out later in the future?

If I had a choice between NA, SC, or TT, I would choose NA even though this is the more expensive route. Nothing like the feeling of a highly balanced motor making power all by itself without any forced induction. Maybe someone will come out lightened and strengthened internals that can turn this motor into a high revving one.

Anyone else interested in this besides me?

RCZ · 09-25-2009, 10:14 PM

I was all about this before but like you said, cost is insane. I didn't want to feel turbo lag and if I could keep the car na I would, but in order to make the amount of power I want with an na setup it would be impossible on a private budget. (-at least my private budget). But I know you don't stay na to make power, you do jt to have a fast high revving motor with flat torque and instant response. It's all very tempting but not very realistic for the average Joe. That's why I put this idea in the backburner and will settle for making my supercharger setup as revvy and responsive as possible.

carfr3ak · 09-26-2009, 02:19 AM

Agreed. If not NA, then SC, nothing like linear power. TT would be a last resort, although the idea of being able to switch from low boost for casual driving to high boost is an awesome thing to have.

09-25-2009, 05:04 PM	#1 (permalink)
carfr3ak Base Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Nor Cal Posts: 71 Drives: Nissan SUV Rep Power: 15	NA Power With all this forced induction talk, what about NA power, like stroker kits? Is this going to come out later in the future? If I had a choice between NA, SC, or TT, I would choose NA even though this is the more expensive route. Nothing like the feeling of a highly balanced motor making power all by itself without any forced induction. Maybe someone will come out lightened and strengthened internals that can turn this motor into a high revving one. Anyone else interested in this besides me?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
370Z power	hori	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	12	09-16-2009 10:26 PM
rep power?	black09Z	The370Z.com Feedback, Suggestions & Questions	3	08-12-2009 02:06 AM
Power graphs	desertzrat	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	1	07-26-2009 09:47 PM
JD Power Award	MJM33067	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	16	06-24-2009 07:50 PM
What is 'rep power' in the sig?	370sed	The370Z.com Feedback, Suggestions & Questions	1	02-22-2009 08:51 AM

09-25-2009, 10:14 PM	#2 (permalink)
RCZ A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Miami Posts: 6,403 Drives: '09 370Z Rep Power: 1118	I was all about this before but like you said, cost is insane. I didn't want to feel turbo lag and if I could keep the car na I would, but in order to make the amount of power I want with an na setup it would be impossible on a private budget. (-at least my private budget). But I know you don't stay na to make power, you do jt to have a fast high revving motor with flat torque and instant response. It's all very tempting but not very realistic for the average Joe. That's why I put this idea in the backburner and will settle for making my supercharger setup as revvy and responsive as possible.

09-26-2009, 02:19 AM	#3 (permalink)
carfr3ak Base Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Nor Cal Posts: 71 Drives: Nissan SUV Rep Power: 15	Agreed. If not NA, then SC, nothing like linear power. TT would be a last resort, although the idea of being able to switch from low boost for casual driving to high boost is an awesome thing to have.