![]() |
Originally Posted by mannyz Im sorry Kanibul for the missunderstanding but that is not my point, and that is not what the law says, even that I do understand your
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Jenks, OK
Posts: 2,281
Drives: 370z Touring/Sport
Rep Power: 269 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
They could easily attribue any type engine modification to any driveline failure, and you lose your case. In the case of wheels - people that are adding spacers - when the wheel bearings or ball joints fail, they could easily say that it changed the load on the wheel bearings/ball joints to exceed design specifications, and you're left holding the bag. Same thing with stretched tires and blowing the sidewalls... Then there's the angle they can take with regards to abuse. If you damage the CV joints in the rear axles - wether you modified something or not, they could easily say that it was due to abuse. The Act does have some angles where it can protect a consumer in the event of a warranty claim where something in the car has been modified - but there are still some very big loopholes...in other words, I wouldn't depend on the Magnuson-Moss Act alone... Last edited by kannibul; 06-19-2009 at 07:52 AM. |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What engine temp are you normally around? | RCZ | Engine & Drivetrain | 92 | 06-25-2016 02:58 PM |
| Warm Up / Oil Temp Gauge | TacoZ | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 8 | 12-18-2008 02:33 PM |