[OFFICIAL] Manual v. Automatic Thread

[FPenvy]

Originally Posted by jwick

The MT is a fucton stronger. In fact nobody has figured out what it takes to grenade one. The AT lets go at about 350wtq. Try again.

you misspelled "fraction".

no one has found it because anyone who boosts it puts a new clutch in to handle it.

[jwick]

Originally Posted by FPenvy

you misspelled "fraction".



no one has found it because anyone who boosts it puts a new clutch in to handle it.

We're talking about the transmission. The clutch is outside the transmission. Do we need to grab a diagram from how it works from you so you'll understand?

[FPenvy]

Originally Posted by jwick

We're talking about the transmission. The clutch is outside the transmission. Do we need to grab a diagram from how it works from you so you'll understand?

its still a main component that needs to be change to handle the additional power.

[Haboob]

Originally Posted by FPenvy

the MT isn't much stronger and that's after you pay to change the CSC that WILL fail.

and as for 2 I honestly 100% have more fun ripping through back roads, highways, etc.... with 2 hands on the wheels grabbing paddles. not only am I safer i'm also quicker in many ways.

I'm not any less safe with a 6MT.

You don't change gears through a corner, that's a big no-no. Always two hands on the wheel when cornering.

(Unless you're drifting, then everything is thrown out the window)

[jwick]

Originally Posted by FPenvy

its still a main component that needs to be change to handle the additional power.

You mean like that crappy flex plate that comes in your shitty AT? We can go back and forth one for one on all components "OUTSIDE" the transmission but if we compare just the transmission itself there is no comparison on the ability to hold power. MT >>> AT

[FPenvy]

Originally Posted by jwick

You mean like that crappy flex plate that comes in your shitty AT? We can go back and forth one for one on all components "OUTSIDE" the transmission but if we compare just the transmission itself there is no comparison on the ability to hold power. MT >>> AT

still doesn't make it a better option. stock for stock it'll fail just the same with added power. might take a little more but it will fail.

[jwick]

Originally Posted by FPenvy

still doesn't make it a better option. stock for stock it'll fail just the same with added power. might take a little more but it will fail.

It'll hold at least an extra 100wtq before failing. That's a huge percentage and not 'fail just the same with added power'. It'll hold more power before it fails. That's a win!

I never argue the points that are clearly in the ATs favor but you always seem to argue about the points that are clearly in the MTs favor.

[FPenvy]

Originally Posted by jwick

It'll hold at least an extra 100wtq before failing. That's a huge percentage and not 'fail just the same with added power'. It'll hold more power before it fails. That's a win!

I never argue the points that are clearly in the ATs favor but you always seem to argue about the points that are clearly in the MTs favor.

I just like to argue haven't we established this already? act like you've been here before lol