Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Engine & Drivetrain (http://www.the370z.com/engine-drivetrain/)
-   -   [OFFICIAL] Manual v. Automatic Thread (http://www.the370z.com/engine-drivetrain/2087-official-manual-v-automatic-thread.html)

FPenvy 03-24-2015 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwick (Post 3147310)
Don't you still only get true black from a plasma. And there's an xboxone at home hooked up to a LCD and the PS4 is hooked up to a plasma. The plasma if far superior to the LCD when playing a game.

Oh wait...that's probably just because the PS4 is better. Never mind :stirthepot:

sir you can attack my transmission but I will not allow you to attack xbox.

that's like saying Jesus was a fag to bible thumpers.

:bowrofl:

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwick (Post 3147312)
No. Prove that $1k will give you 500wtq

tranny cooler - $300-400
flex plate will probably be $300-500
tune is part of TT so idk if that cost counts for the 5 min it takes to up the line pressure.

that should be ok for 500. I think....... lol

jwick 03-24-2015 10:48 AM

[OFFICIAL] Manual v. Automatic Thread
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 3147321)
sir you can attack my transmission but I will not allow you to attack xbox.



that's like saying Jesus was a fag to bible thumpers.



:bowrofl:







tranny cooler - $300-400

flex plate will probably be $300-500

tune is part of TT so idk if that cost counts for the 5 min it takes to up the line pressure.



that should be ok for 500. I think....... lol


I had a great come back to the Jesus quote but only premium section approved.

The mods you listed might, might, hold 500 TQ at the flywheel, and that is iffy, but it ain't doing it at the wheels buddy

JARblue 03-24-2015 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 3147280)
TECHNICALLY.......Tony's new flex plate and AT upgrades could be the solution.

also many people have easily gone with a trans cooler, line pressure tune, and maybe a VB upgrade.

to hold 500TQ you'll spend about $1k with the MT.....oh and add $500 for CSC fix. the AT is about the same money to hold 500

anything over that why not build it to be bulletproof like a $4k tranny from level10 or however much tony's new upgrades are.

Where are you getting your numbers? Are you including labor?

Let's get specific here. MT upgrade costs a new clutch. Let's say $1500 including labor for a nicer clutch that can handle 500 hp and 400 ft-lbs torque. Add another $300 to upgrade the CSC (no extra labor since the clutch is being done). We're at $1800.

From what I've seen the trans cooler will cost ~$400 plus labor. The VB upgrade is like $900 plus labor (can you get it from someone other than GTM? :eekdance:). So you're probably around the same cost including labor for cooler and vb install. And with all this, can you even guarantee that the AT will hold more than 400 ft-lb torque? I don't think so...

And who says you have to upgrade the MT internals to get the same HP as a Level10 tranny upgrade? Has anyone broken an MT with too much torque? I don't think so. I wonder if any of the 800+ hp builds have upgrade MT internals. I don't think so.

http://www.troll.me/images/baby-godf...at-you-got.jpg

JARblue 03-24-2015 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwick (Post 3147310)
Don't you still only get true black from a plasma.

Nope. That's why OLED is far superior. Even at its infancy now.

FPenvy 03-24-2015 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JARblue (Post 3147330)
Where are you getting your numbers? Are you including labor?

Let's get specific here. MT upgrade costs a new clutch. Let's say $1500 including labor for a nicer clutch that can handle 500 hp and 400 ft-lbs torque. Add another $300 to upgrade the CSC (no extra labor since the clutch is being done). We're at $1800.

From what I've seen the trans cooler will cost ~$400 plus labor. The tune will cost at least $500 if not a bit more depending on which software and package. The VB upgrade is like $900 plus labor (can you get it from someone other than GTM?). So you're at $1800 + labor for cooler and vb install. That's like 33% more cost than the MT not including the initial AT hike at the dealer. And with all this, can you even guarantee that the AT will hold more than 400 ft-lb torque? I don't think so...

And who says you have to upgrade the MT internals to get the same HP as a Level10 tranny upgrade? Has anyone broken an MT with too much torque? I don't think so. I wonder if any of the 800+ hp builds have upgrade MT internals. I don't think so.

http://www.troll.me/images/baby-godf...at-you-got.jpg

I was hoping you didn't remember GTM was really the only VB upgrade right now lol

yea yea ok for slightly less you can hold 500tq in the MT vs AT.

but it's still subpar. :stirthepot:

jwick 03-24-2015 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JARblue (Post 3147333)
Nope. That's why OLED is far superior. Even at its infancy now.


Haven't bought a TV in over five years so that's good to know. My plasma still looks just as good as any I see at other people's house or the stores.

The only draw back I have on plasma is the pixels age. In another couple of years I'll probably be out of brightness setting

FPenvy 03-24-2015 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwick (Post 3147337)
Haven't bought a TV in over five years so that's good to know. My plasma still looks just as good as any I see at other people's house or the stores.

The only draw back I have on plasma is the pixels age. In another couple of years I'll probably be out of brightness setting

I still have a plasma just for the xbox. it's awesome but weighs a million pounds. I agree with the pixel age only because I do see a couple dead pixels along the bottom left corner of mine. nothing no one else will notice but I do lol

jwick 03-24-2015 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 3147339)
I still have a plasma just for the xbox. it's awesome but weighs a million pounds. I agree with the pixel age only because I do see a couple dead pixels along the bottom left corner of mine. nothing no one else will notice but I do lol


I don't have any dead ones but I recalibrate every couple years and the only thing that changes is I have to increase the brightness some

JARblue 03-24-2015 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 3147336)
I was hoping you didn't remember GTM was really the only VB upgrade right now lol

yea yea ok for slightly less you can hold 500tq in the MT vs AT.

but it's still subpar. :stirthepot:

:roflpuke2: nice try

Damn straight! :driving: :icon17:

Now there's some AT driver logic! MT is better and less expensive, but it is still subpar :rolleyes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwick (Post 3147337)
Haven't bought a TV in over five years so that's good to know. My plasma still looks just as good as any I see at other people's house or the stores.

The only draw back I have on plasma is the pixels age. In another couple of years I'll probably be out of brightness setting

You will be buying an OLED TV next, I can pretty much guarantee it. My LED is nearly 7 years old now, but it was one of the top of the line 240Hz (need for sports) at the time. No reason to upgrade even now. I'll wait until the OLED get a little better and come down in price.

FPenvy 03-24-2015 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JARblue (Post 3147346)
:roflpuke2: nice try

Damn straight! :driving: :icon17:

Now there's some AT driver logic! MT is better and less expensive, but it is still subpar :rolleyes:

it's not better. yes it is cheaper for now. we still need to see what tony's parts are going to cost.

could be interesting :stirthepot:

JARblue 03-24-2015 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 3147351)
it's not better. yes it is cheaper for now. we still need to see what tony's parts are going to cost.

could be interesting :stirthepot:

lol again with the AT driver logic. How is more power for less money not better? :stirthepot:

Also, I should mention I am currently developing an upgrade for the MT internals that allow it to hold 2000 hp and 2000 ft-lb torque. And it only costs $100. Beat that, bitch! :roflpuke2:

FPenvy 03-24-2015 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JARblue (Post 3147378)
lol again with the AT driver logic. How is more power for less money not better? :stirthepot:

Also, I should mention I am currently developing an upgrade for the MT internals that allow it to hold 2000 hp and 2000 ft-lb torque. And it only costs $100. Beat that, bitch! :roflpuke2:

whatever you're on you better share that's all i'm saying.

puff puff pass :yum:

but the money difference could be marginal at best once we see the parts and costs from FI.

and let's say the cost is close/equal and held the same power the AT would still be better. I mean it's better stock and it's better upgraded. FI just set the 370Z WR in the 1/4 mile with a 7AT.

JARblue 03-24-2015 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 3147386)
whatever you're on you better share that's all i'm saying.

puff puff pass :yum:

but the money difference could be marginal at best once we see the parts and costs from FI.

and let's say the cost is close/equal and held the same power the AT would still be better. I mean it's better stock and it's better upgraded. FI just set the 370Z WR in the 1/4 mile with a 7AT.

:icon17: I always share :tiphat:

I'm still wondering what kind of power limits the AT will hit before needing a serious Level10 upgrade vs the power limits the MT will hit before needing internal upgrades. My argument is that the MT limit is much higher (which is why it is better). So either one can get to 500 hp without too much difficulty, but beyond that, you're shelling out serious cash to upgrade the AT vs just choosing a different clutch kit that can handle more power for the MT.

FPenvy 03-24-2015 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JARblue (Post 3147457)
:icon17: I always share :tiphat:

I'm still wondering what kind of power limits the AT will hit before needing a serious Level10 upgrade vs the power limits the MT will hit before needing internal upgrades. My argument is that the MT limit is much higher (which is why it is better). So either one can get to 500 hp without too much difficulty, but beyond that, you're shelling out serious cash to upgrade the AT vs just choosing a different clutch kit that can handle more power for the MT.

I have seen AT's on here pushing 550whp and 450tq no issues.

I now want to find a crashed 370, take the tranny, and stress test it lol

jwick 03-24-2015 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 3147482)
I have seen AT's on here pushing 550whp and 450tq no issues.



I now want to find a crashed 370, take the tranny, and stress test it lol


Name one

FPenvy 03-24-2015 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwick (Post 3147548)
Name one

somewhere in that finished builds thread......:ugh2:

jwick 03-24-2015 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 3147559)
somewhere in that finished builds thread......:ugh2:

That's what I figured. Talkin' out your a$$ again

FPenvy 03-24-2015 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwick (Post 3147568)
That's what I figured. Talkin' out your a$$ again

there's a high HP one in there. the rest are hovering around 400tq but that is due to the fact no really good options have been available. that and most people are just too scared to blow a tranny......giggity. :tiphat:

:bowrofl:

jwick 03-24-2015 01:08 PM

You still haven't provided an example. I'm not going to read thru all that to prove your point. That burden is on you. There are plenty of MTs holding serious power.

FPenvy 03-24-2015 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwick (Post 3147604)
You still haven't provided an example. I'm not going to read thru all that to prove your point. That burden is on you. There are plenty of MTs holding serious power.

MTs with lots of money in clutch/flywheel upgrades.

how many people boost the Z and stick with a stock clutch?

the fact is not many if any stick with the stock clutch. your only point of MT v AT is cost to get to a 500tq strength. with 10-15k in a turbo build another 1-3k in transmission upgrades is just part of the process.

it's really a moot point being that when doing a turbo build you will have supporting mod costs.

in the end boosting a Z then upgrading either transmission to the same strength will result in them being equal. maybe a difference cost but as far as a unit they are equal. therefore the AT which is better stock v. stock will still be better upgraded v. upgraded.

ayrton88 03-24-2015 01:57 PM

I could give a crap about HP and lap times. I love a manual because it is just more fun to drive. Simple as that. I like having both hands and feet involved with controlling the car. As I mentioned in previous posts, I made the mistake of buying a BMW with the SMG paddle shifters...sold it within a year. Just plain boring.

BC416 03-24-2015 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ayrton88 (Post 3147694)
I could give a crap about HP and lap times. I love a manual because it is just more fun to drive. Simple as that. I like having both hands and feet involved with controlling the car. As I mentioned in previous posts, I made the mistake of buying a BMW with the SMG paddle shifters...sold it within a year. Just plain boring.

+1

You can go in circles about HP, who can hold the most tq, lap times, CSC..blah blah. One involves 3 pedals and the other doesn't. Pretty simple in my opinion.

JARblue 03-24-2015 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 3147576)
most people are just too scared to blow a tranny......giggity.

Give me the money and I'll blow it ;)

FPenvy 03-24-2015 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JARblue (Post 3147770)
Give me the money and I'll blow it ;)

sold!

:yum:

JARblue 03-24-2015 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwick (Post 3147604)
You still haven't provided an example. I'm not going to read thru all that to prove your point. That burden is on you. There are plenty of MTs holding serious power.

I just did. I did not see a single AT over 400 ft-lbs in that list. The highest I found was the guy in Australia running a 4.2L and pushing 540 Nm (398 ft-lbs). There are barely a handful over 350 ft-lbs (I found 6 others), and at least that many if not more that aren't even over 300 ft-lbs boosted. Now that's fuckin weak :stirthepot:

MT handles way more with just clutch/csc upgrade. And considering those are already supporting mods expected for boost, you barely have to spend any extra funds (just depends on which clutch you choose) to take advantage of the torque available to the MT.

So let's clarify. The MT handles quite a bit of power in stock forum (clutch is not part of the transmission internals). The AT in stock form is quite weak in terms of power, but shifts ever so slightly faster. Basic AT upgrades (not the $4K Level10 build) can't even reach stock MT power limits. Yeah, I'll go with the manual, please :driving:

I implore the AT drivers to come up with other arguments that cannot be dismissed so easily :stirthepot:

FPenvy 03-24-2015 03:24 PM

did you miss this:

2012 G37 IPL 7AT GTM Stage 1 TT at 13PSI - 556HP & 418TQ More Info

I mean not a Z but same tranny. and with ANY boost build regardless of which transmission you have yes supporting mods are part of it.

again your argument falls back to money and how much you need 3 pedals. that's about it.

it's been the only comeback the MT side has had and you all don't have much.

JARblue 03-24-2015 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 3147822)
did you miss this:

2012 G37 IPL 7AT GTM Stage 1 TT at 13PSI - 556HP & 418TQ More Info

I mean not a Z but same tranny. and with ANY boost build regardless of which transmission you have yes supporting mods are part of it.

again your argument falls back to money and how much you need 3 pedals. that's about it.

it's been the only comeback the MT side has had and you all don't have much.

:roflpuke2: You are sure grasping at straws here. Ooops sorry, I left out the G :rolleyes: And wow... 20 more ft-lbs than the next closest. That doesn't change $hit. The AT sucks a$$ for power. It doesn't do anything else well enough to make up for that. The MT guys are all running 350ft-lbs or more. And many of them are running 500-550 ft-lbs.

What do you mean money? Or pedals? Those have nothing to do with the fact that the MT is stronger and more powerful. And the AT sucks :tiphat:

jwick 03-24-2015 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 3147822)
did you miss this:

2012 G37 IPL 7AT GTM Stage 1 TT at 13PSI - 556HP & 418TQ More Info

I mean not a Z but same tranny. and with ANY boost build regardless of which transmission you have yes supporting mods are part of it.

again your argument falls back to money and how much you need 3 pedals. that's about it.

it's been the only comeback the MT side has had and you all don't have much.

Did you miss the part where he's running a Stage 4 built GTM Tranny? No telling what that ran him.

FPenvy 03-24-2015 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JARblue (Post 3147828)
:roflpuke2: You are sure grasping at straws here. Ooops sorry, I left out the G :rolleyes: And wow... 20 more ft-lbs than the next closest. That doesn't change $hit. The AT sucks a$$ for power. It doesn't do anything else well enough to make up for that. The MT guys are all running 350ft-lbs or more. And many of them are running 500-550 ft-lbs.

What do you mean money? Or pedals? Those have nothing to do with the fact that the MT is stronger and more powerful. And the AT sucks :tiphat:

AT sucks but yet has the best 1/4 mile time :stirthepot:

I highly doubt a stock MT will hold 500ft/lbs+ for very long until it was gone.

so you have to spend money. spend same money give or take and the AT is the same strength. not a hard concept to grasp lol

FPenvy 03-24-2015 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwick (Post 3147831)
Did you miss the part where he's running a Stage 4 built GTM Tranny? No telling what that ran him.

god dammit J stay out lol


where the hell is all my teammates today? :shakes head:

damn gang bangin homos :bowrofl:

JARblue 03-24-2015 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwick (Post 3147831)
Did you miss the part where he's running a Stage 4 built GTM Tranny? No telling what that ran him.

For 418 ft-lbs?!?!? :wtf2:

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 3147836)
god dammit J stay out lol


where the hell is all my teammates today? :shakes head:

damn gang bangin homos :bowrofl:

:icon18: :roflpuke2: JAR jumps FP. Jwick jumps FP. GANG BANG!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57jOssjTbWw

JARblue 03-24-2015 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 3147833)
AT sucks but yet has the best 1/4 mile time :stirthepot:

Only because the MT guys are on the track while the AT guys are grab assing at the drag strip :shakes head:

JARblue 03-24-2015 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 3147833)
I highly doubt a stock MT will hold 500ft/lbs+ for very long until it was gone.

Ummm... some of those guys have been running for several years with lots of track time. How long does it have to hold 500 ft-lbs to be valid data? :rolleyes:

jwick 03-24-2015 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 3147836)
god dammit J stay out lol





where the hell is all my teammates today? :shakes head:



damn gang bangin homos :bowrofl:


:tiphat:

JWillis72 03-24-2015 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JARblue (Post 3147844)
Only because the MT guys are on the track while the AT guys are grab assing at the drag strip :shakes head:

My 7AT has only seen road courses, it's never been to a drag strip.

JARblue 03-24-2015 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JWillis72 (Post 3147898)
My 7AT has only seen road courses, it's never been to a drag strip.

You've never driven it on the freeway? :rolleyes: :wtf2: :icon17:

Stop bringing legitimate data into the equation :p

Rusty 03-24-2015 04:42 PM

Someone got their head so far up their a$$. That they have to unbutton their shirt to see. Not naming names here. :rofl2:

JWillis72 03-24-2015 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JARblue (Post 3147902)
You've never driven it on the freeway? :rolleyes: :wtf2: :icon17:

Stop bringing legitimate data into the equation :p

I would never drag race on the freeway, it's against the rules here:tup:

Bulletz4break 03-24-2015 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FPenvy (Post 3147833)
AT sucks but yet has the best 1/4 mile time :stirthepot:

I highly doubt a stock MT will hold 500ft/lbs+ for very long until it was gone.

so you have to spend money. spend same money give or take and the AT is the same strength. not a hard concept to grasp lol

They just run more consistent times because you don't have to do anything except press down the gas pedal

JWillis72 03-24-2015 07:09 PM

No you still shift it, just don't have a clutch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2