Nissan 370Z Forum  

The horsepower race has gone nuclear: 2013 GT500

Originally Posted by shadoquad "Safety measures" didn't make cars lighter. It made them bulkier, less maneuverable, harder to stop. So then braking and handling had to be upgraded to keep

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z General Area > The Lounge (Off Topic) > Other Vehicles


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-06-2012, 12:56 PM   #1 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
nuTinmuch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,092
Drives: PG 7AT 370Z
Rep Power: 18
nuTinmuch is a jewel in the roughnuTinmuch is a jewel in the roughnuTinmuch is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to nuTinmuch
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shadoquad View Post
"Safety measures" didn't make cars lighter. It made them bulkier, less maneuverable, harder to stop. So then braking and handling had to be upgraded to keep up. Engines needed more power to be considered "fast". Then someone noticed that heavier cars with more powerful engines were brutally inefficient, and so FI became the winning move. Even archaic BMW moved into FI performance models.
I never said they did, but they were hardly the only thing inflating the weight of cars.

In fact, I'd wager they weren't even the largest factor, especially when you consider the shift in building materials used and the birth of the crumple zone.

A BMW isn't heavy because it is safe, for example, it is heavy because it is designed to be comfortable and quiet. Those design choices have way more of an implication on vehicle weight than the inclusion of something like traction control, ABS, or structure rigidity.

But that is irrelevant. My point is that it is possible to have a safe, relatively efficient, fun car. None of these things have to mean major sacrifices -- they just often do because they are the road of least resistance. But in the modern era, people are pretty demanding, and that isn't good enough anymore. We want it all, and considering the cars released in the last year or two (and a few of them in the pipeline), we're going to get 'em.
__________________
nuTinmuch! -- Platinum Graphite 370Z -- Check out my Gallery thread here!

Last edited by nuTinmuch; 06-06-2012 at 01:00 PM.
nuTinmuch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2012, 01:03 PM   #2 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
shadoquad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: .
Posts: 42,608
Drives: .
Rep Power: 3887
shadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond reputeshadoquad has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nuTinmuch View Post
I never said they did, but they were hardly the only thing inflating the weight of cars.

In fact, I'd wager they weren't even the largest factor, especially when you consider the shift in building materials used and the birth of the crumple zone.

A BMW isn't heavy because it is safe, for example, it is heavy because it is designed to be comfortable and quiet. Those design choices have way more of an implication on vehicle weight than the inclusion of something like traction control, ABS, or structure rigidity.

But that is irrelevant. My point is that it is possible to have a safe, relatively efficient, fun car. None of these things have to mean major sacrifices -- they just often do because they are the road of least resistance. But in the modern era, people are pretty demanding, and that isn't good enough anymore. We want it all, and considering the cars released in the last year or two (and a few of them in the pipeline), we're going to get 'em.
We could argue about this all day, and I'd lump crumple zones in with safety measures. That's why they exist. BMW's were comfortable and quiet in the early 90's. They were also lighter.

But we're veering way off topic here. Suffice to say, the NHTSA is not my best friend.
shadoquad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2012, 01:05 PM   #3 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
nuTinmuch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,092
Drives: PG 7AT 370Z
Rep Power: 18
nuTinmuch is a jewel in the roughnuTinmuch is a jewel in the roughnuTinmuch is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to nuTinmuch
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shadoquad View Post
We could argue about this all day, and I'd lump crumple zones in with safety measures. That's why they exist. BMW's were comfortable and quiet in the early 90's. They were also lighter.

But we're veering way off topic here. Suffice to say, the NHTSA is not my best friend.
They aren't perfect, but after being in a bad accident in a modern car, I'm a lot softer when it comes to safety stuff.

Anyway, back on topic.

Chevy Camaro ZL1 lines up against Ford Shelby GT500 on the dyno
__________________
nuTinmuch! -- Platinum Graphite 370Z -- Check out my Gallery thread here!
nuTinmuch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2012, 10:32 PM   #4 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
ImportConvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: SWMO
Posts: 4,454
Drives: 2019 CX5 GT Reserve
Rep Power: 7628
ImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond reputeImportConvert has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nuTinmuch View Post
They aren't perfect, but after being in a bad accident in a modern car, I'm a lot softer when it comes to safety stuff.

Anyway, back on topic.

Chevy Camaro ZL1 lines up against Ford Shelby GT500 on the dyno
Looks like I am going to admit to being totally wrong. Ford's power + launch control = big victory at the drag-strip.

I am still not sure what to think about the track, though. The MRC suspension kicks the crap out of Fords dinosaur. But the power difference....I bet on long tracks the GT500 eats it up in the straights but on shorter tracks--especially one's with elevation changes and chicanes--the ZL1 makes the Shelby look clumsy.
ImportConvert is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
800 hp gt500 Cell Other Vehicles 10 04-10-2011 11:35 PM
GT500 vs 370Z spearfish25 Nissan 370Z General Discussions 186 10-04-2010 02:33 PM
2008 shelby gt500 nismo42 Other Vehicle For sale 9 07-18-2010 01:53 AM
370z vs gt500 Zrod Track / Autocross / Drifting / Dragstrip 10 04-11-2010 06:39 PM
2010 Mustang GT500 xDIEGOx Other Vehicles 10 01-02-2009 04:19 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2