![]() |
I'm a big fan of AMG, but have never seen a reason to AMG up the G wagon beyond the "cause we can" line of thinking. This also applies to
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Track Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 516
Drives: MB 370z
Rep Power: 19 ![]() ![]() |
I'm a big fan of AMG, but have never seen a reason to AMG up the G wagon beyond the "cause we can" line of thinking. This also applies to turbo Porsche SUV's. I could spend that money a lot better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
|
yea but the cayenne is all independent suspension (vs the G-wagon which is solid axle front and rear). i've driven the cayenne turbo and it preforms really well for the size of it, the electronic suspension really works wonders on that thing not to mention the rush of torque off the twin turbo engine. the G-wagon is really a "cause we can" vehicle whereas the cayenne was designed from the get-go to be the turbo variant and the chassis is made for it
__________________
Patrick // 06 Frontier 6spd Nismosis // Mods: Uprev Tuned @ Z1 Motorsports: 257whp & 292 ft lbs 09 Pontiac G8 GXP // M6 // Sunroof // Tint... For now
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Track Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 516
Drives: MB 370z
Rep Power: 19 ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|