I think we're on threat level midnight now :roflpuke2:

wow...am full blown mustang guy...lol what happened....just bought my first mustang mag too

steve what muffleres did you get?

Yep. Featuring the GT500 squealing and not going anywhere fast like the pig it is :roflpuke2:

:icon18:

FRPP Sport (Borla S-Type).

Whenever I think about Mustangs on track this is what I envision.

LastHPDEnomusic video by GGolsan - Photobucket

Like I have indicated on flat surfaces they do OK but put some elevation changes in play and they become down right nasty with wicked weight transfer to the front which pretty much makes rears weightless. Put an unskilled driver in that combo with 400 plus HP and your looking for an accident to happen.

lol....well its a new day my friend...time to breath in the new air

I couldnt resist!:tiphat:

:icon18::tup:

The darn things seem to love to spin and go Turtle when on track? :eek:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJ5dy8G8gzo

Ok so I'm still kind of a n00b when it comes to this stuff so can someone explain to me the difference between the Mustang's SRA and an IRS. Thanks :tup:

Well a Mustang SRA is sort of like this but with wider tires and 450 more donkeys

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_31E42A08Db...y_cart+(1).jpg

And 370Z IRS is more like this but with skinnier tires and only about 300 donkeys

http://f1driver.com/images/rear_view.jpg

Thanks :ugh2:

SRA = Solid Rear Axil = both wheels on a single mechanism something like a teetertotter

IRS = independant rear suspention = wheels move independant of each other.

IRS is better on bumpy roads, harsh road conditions. SRA is generally thought to be better at handling gobs of power cheaply and has slightly less drivetrain loss.

That's the answer I was looking for, thanks :tup: