Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Nissan 370Z General Discussions (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/)
-   -   370Z Sport Package vs Mazdaspeed 3 GT vs S2000 vs Cayman S vs Mazda Rx-8 (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/7488-370z-sport-package-vs-mazdaspeed-3-gt-vs-s2000-vs-cayman-s-vs-mazda-rx-8-a.html)

kdoske 08-05-2009 09:06 PM

I hope this thread tears a hole in the Internet Continuum and gets sucked into the same dimension as the Even Horizon where it will be greeted by chaos, pure evil, and Sam Neill...

http://cache.boston.com/bonzai-fba/O...735_3838-1.jpg
ex inferis-liberate tutame

travisjb 08-05-2009 09:52 PM

^ Whisky tango foxtrot!

Can someone please translate Satin's post for me? lol

joeyz10 08-06-2009 03:29 AM

Guys why arfe you wasting time on this Mook guy? He is just playing with us, ignore him. Let hime keep his MS3. And now he is asking how much to mod the 370z to 300+ torque? Why are you asking? you don't like the Z anyway. Go buy your USED CAYMAN!!! Why are you not taing RCZ's challenge? you guys are both from FL? Enough of this non-sense afterall we are just probably talking to a boy with fantasies on cars....LOL lol

mook 08-06-2009 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeyz10 (Post 140079)
Guys why arfe you wasting time on this Mook guy? He is just playing with us, ignore him. Let hime keep his MS3. And now he is asking how much to mod the 370z to 300+ torque? Why are you asking? you don't like the Z anyway. Go buy your USED CAYMAN!!! Why are you not taing RCZ's challenge? you guys are both from FL? Enough of this non-sense afterall we are just probably talking to a boy with fantasies on cars....LOL lol

The discounted Cayman ended up being not very mechanically sound, so I backed out. The real price range makes it a lousy value when it does not have an LSD. Like I said, I will wait a couple of years for the 09 model to become cheaper.
I am not about to spend $70k (with options) on a car, whether I can afford it or not.

Now that the S2000 is discountinued and the cheap Cayman S is a pipe dream, for me there is no alternative to 370Z at this price range for RWD. So, I am back thinking about getting one and getting used to the extra weight.
Maybe wait till 2010 model comes out, see what is gonna change.

Never been to a racetrack, so can't take any challenges, sorry. Would be interesting to sit shotgun on a track in a Z that has been only minimally modified to see just how the thing feels at real speeds.

Greg 08-06-2009 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by travisjb (Post 139686)
^ Whisky tango foxtrot!

Can someone please translate Satin's post for me? lol


Place thread where the sun don't shine aka :icon23:...Thats my thought. :p

shabarivas 08-06-2009 11:12 AM

lol @ this thread... if you have ever driven a Z - thats any Z not just a 370... you will take back your silly comparison so fast lol

SnakeBitten 08-06-2009 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sand123 (Post 138854)

I had dismissed the Z previously because the 350 was a slower car than the MS3 as far as power to weight and track times are concerned.

:confused::confused: Track times lol.

kdoske 08-06-2009 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg (Post 140279)
Place thread where the sun don't shine aka :icon23:...Thats my thought. :p

yes, perfect translation.

Lug 08-06-2009 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sand123 (Post 138854)

I had dismissed the Z previously because the 350 was a slower car than the MS3 as far as power to weight and track times are concerned.

:confused:

Nürburgring lap times

350Z - 8:26 (old 283 HP version)
MazdaSpeed3 - 8:39


That's a pretty significant difference.

shabarivas 08-06-2009 03:48 PM

I dont know where people get off comparing the Z w/ a goddam grocery getting MS3... I mean sure- its turbo.. but jeez

RogueDPS 08-06-2009 04:20 PM

2 Attachment(s)
I promised myself I wasn't going to do this, and here I am on only my second post. I have both an RX-8 and a 370Z. I love them both. I've had the RX for a few years now. I've had the Z only a few weeks. They're both great cars and they both put a smile on my face . . . they just go about it different ways. The RX is like like dancing with a ballerina - subtlety and poise that can really get you in a zone. The Z is more like one of those hot beach volleyball players - balance and grace in spades, but man she can knock your socks off.

Threads like this encourage us to stand up for the cars we love but at the same time Mook is trying to bait us into dumping on other great cars.

Here's a couple of crappy photos.

Lug 08-06-2009 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RogueDPS (Post 141206)
I promised myself I wasn't going to do this, and here I am on only my second post. I have both an RX-8 and a 370Z.

Oh, I hate you now! :mad:




:D

SnakeBitten 08-06-2009 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lug (Post 141044)
:confused:

Nürburgring lap times

350Z - 8:26 (old 283 HP version)
MazdaSpeed3 - 8:39


That's a pretty significant difference.

Truth. Not to mention that its 4+ sec slower than the Rev Up Z that set the Lightning Lap LL2 class record at VIR 4 mile track. Now imagine what an HR Z with the 245/265 tires would do to the MS3 on VIR or the Ring. Or even a Nismo 350 Z:eek:

I have alot of love for the MS3. Its a great car and a lot of potential but its not in the same league with the Z stock to stock. Modded its anybodies game however and every car has potential when modded and needs to be respected.

stag3 08-06-2009 08:01 PM

the ms3 is good for what it is, but it's not in the same class and shouldn't be compared to a Z, we should be comparing an ms3 to the sti and evo :)

just got the call from the dealer, my Z arrived just now
i'm scheduled to go tomorrow after work and look at it
finally i get to drive one and make my decision.
the biggest question is do i want to go 17k more in debt after
my trade in, i'm only considering it since i'm way ahead on my
car loan. i paid 23k for my ms3 9/07
i owe ~8k as of today, i'm getting 17k for my car in trade.

decisions...decision :D

Lug 08-06-2009 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stag3 (Post 141545)
the ms3 is good for what it is, but it's not in the same class and shouldn't be compared to a Z, we should be comparing an ms3 to the sti and evo :)

Actually and STI now costs more than a lot of Z's
****
Pricing for the high-performance model WRX STI, which for 2010 features black alcantara trim and a black center console with red stitching also remains unchanged at $34,995.
****
2010 Subaru Impreza WRX STI Pricing, Images, Specifications - egmCarTech

kdoske 08-06-2009 09:21 PM

asfasdf

stag3 08-06-2009 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lug (Post 141614)
Actually and STI now costs more than a lot of Z's
****
Pricing for the high-performance model WRX STI, which for 2010 features black alcantara trim and a black center console with red stitching also remains unchanged at $34,995.
****
2010 Subaru Impreza WRX STI Pricing, Images, Specifications - egmCarTech

heh i'm going by the 8k off msrp and 0% subaru had a few mos ago
and the 8k off msrp and 0% mitsubishi has now :icon14:

i wish they had those deals when i got my ms3

Red370 08-06-2009 11:28 PM

S2000? are you serious? Read the new issue of DSport, turbo'ed S2000's posting slower track times w a pro driver than a stock 370, your comparisons are proposterous. MS3? Really? BTW, if you can afford a Cayman, you can afford an M3/Used M5, both are far superior IMHO.

gnarf 08-07-2009 09:31 AM

who in their right mind would pick a 265 hp fwd hatch thats only 100 lbs lighter than a 332hp rwd coupe that was made as a sports car to begin with (that whole power to weight mumbo jumbo is bs)..sorry Mook...but you def did not drive the 370z hard enough to appreciate it...the sensation of speed is dulled in a 370z because it actually makes the driver feel comfortable at higher speeds (even the GT-R is like this)..i could fall asleep at 110 in my G37..the s2000 and rx8 on the other hand..despite being amazing handling cars lack top end and do not feel as composed at higher speeds..which is probably why you felt faster in those cars...go to the RX8 forum...even those guys say the 370z is better in every way and even they would consider a 370z...the 370z posted faster times than the EvoX in BOTH Top Gears and it has almost never lost a comparison (except the revised Cayman with PDK)

if you want to feel like you are going fast in a 370z or any nissan/infiniti...open the windows...

RogueDPS 08-07-2009 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnarf (Post 141950)
rx8 on the other hand..despite being amazing handling cars lack top end and do not feel as composed at higher speeds

Untrue. I track my RX-8 regularly with minimal mods (brakes, wheels, tires) and it is completely composed at speeds well in excess of 110.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnarf (Post 141950)
...go to the RX8 forum...even those guys say the 370z is better in every way

This one made me chuckle. I've belonged to that forum for years and the vast majority are as loyal to their cars as are the people over here. The 370Z is not superior to the RX in "every" way. It is superior to the RX in several significant ways. There are few absolutes in life.

mook 08-07-2009 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red370 (Post 141753)
S2000? are you serious? Read the new issue of DSport, turbo'ed S2000's posting slower track times w a pro driver than a stock 370, your comparisons are proposterous. MS3? Really? BTW, if you can afford a Cayman, you can afford an M3/Used M5, both are far superior IMHO.

Naturally, performance wise 370z owns S2000 and a V-8 M3 owns Cayman.
The issue I have with M3 and M5 is weight. I am really looking forward to the 1 M series. That might be perfect for me.

I drove two Caymans recently and it's very cool how the thing turns. The engine in the middle makes a lot of difference. I used to have an MR2 but Cayman is longer so you really notice the difference (I'd hate to swap ends in this car by accident, must be pretty tough to stop that rotation).

Even a 50/50 car like S2000 lacks this feel, maybe because the rotating parts in the engine create extra resistance when trying to turn, kind of like a gyro, not sure. BMW boxer (motorcycle, not car) engines used to have this problem - wouldn't let you lean the bike.

I think for drifting a front engine car might be superior, though.

Robert_Nash 08-07-2009 11:56 AM

:shakes head: Perhaps you should just buy one of everything and that way you can drive the absolute perfect car for that particular hour of that particular day!

mook 08-07-2009 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gnarf (Post 141950)
who in their right mind would pick a 265 hp fwd hatch thats only 100 lbs lighter than a 332hp rwd coupe that was made as a sports car to begin with (that whole power to weight mumbo jumbo is bs)..

Actually, am selling MS3 and all set on buying 370Z.. Instead of reading all the trigger happy fan boy off-topic tirades, take a look at the actual posts.
:shakes head:

MS3 obviously is not a better car than 370Z. And my first post deals with all the shortcomings (steering feel, cheap transmission, fwd, top end drop off, etc).

If you really want to be anal about it, the "feel" is all about the torque, which is the ability to change speed, not in the HP, which is ability to maintain speed.
We have 280 lb torque @ 3000 rpm for MS3 vs 270lb @ 5200 for the Z.

Besides, the top hp in the Z comes at 7000, MS3 - much earlier @ 5,500 rpm. The gearing may also be a bit too tall in the Z contributing to the lack of low end "power feel".

To top it all, ms3 can be about 200lb lighter.

If you don't think 200lb is a big deal - put your mother in law in your trunk and drive around.

Put it all together, and on a straight line from a rolling start you get more excitement out of MS3. Now, if you actually enjoy getting creative in turns once in a while - there is no comparison. Drag race, same thing. Almost any tight RWD car has a huge advantage.

All in all at about 4000 rpm the 2 cars may feel about equally powerful but one has more weight.

Take a look at this comparo that I just found: Winding Road Magazine | Issue 46 - page 146 ("for the starters 370Z did not actually 'feel' that much faster than any of the others... The engine is adequately powerful, but doesn't feel as willing to rev or as potent as the horsepower numbers might lead you to believe...") Of course, they go on to say that 370Z is the best overall car, no doubt about it.

I don't understand why it's suddenly offensive to talk about shortcomings of a car. But hey, if everyone is so offended - I will go away.

theDreamer 08-07-2009 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mook (Post 142431)
I don't understand why it's suddenly offensive to talk about shortcomings of a car. But hey, if everyone is so offended - I will go away.

We talk about all the short comings all day long here, but when you go about it in certain ways you are going to get hit back with what you throw. Come in talking about how you are looking at a Z but feel that without the turbo it might "feel" lacking, even though the Z is all N/A it lacks that low punch, it is all about presentation.

mook 08-07-2009 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theDreamer (Post 142433)
We talk about all the short comings all day long here, but when you go about it in certain ways you are going to get hit back with what you throw. Come in talking about how you are looking at a Z but feel that without the turbo it might "feel" lacking, even though the Z is all N/A it lacks that low punch, it is all about presentation.

LOL Point taken... I just didn't think I need to worry about touchy feelings when talking to people who are supposedly all about fast cars (why else are they spending the extra cash on a Z).

Robert_Nash 08-07-2009 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mook (Post 142431)
...I don't understand why it's suddenly offensive to talk about shortcomings of a car. But hey, if everyone is so offended - I will go away.

Offensive?

For someone who doesn't own a 370Z to join a internet forum established specifically for 370Z enthusiasts and give everyone his/her learned opinion about what's wrong with the vehicle isn't offensive; just rather dumb.

Maybe I should go join a forum dedicated to the C6 Corvette because I've thought about buying one "sometime"...I can then tell them everything I don't like about the car...I love the engine/drivetrain; even in the base model but I really hate OnStar, the 'Vette's crappy seats and it's vacuum tube based navigation system...I'm sure they would be real receptive over there. :)

joeyz10 08-07-2009 06:18 PM

Rober that's awesome and coming from an intelligent person not from a Boy!

gnarf 08-07-2009 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RogueDPS (Post 141989)
Untrue. I track my RX-8 regularly with minimal mods (brakes, wheels, tires) and it is completely composed at speeds well in excess of 110.



This one made me chuckle. I've belonged to that forum for years and the vast majority are as loyal to their cars as are the people over here. The 370Z is not superior to the RX in "every" way. It is superior to the RX in several significant ways. There are few absolutes in life.

I apologize for that misunderstanding..I read that in an automotive forum not an RX8 forum...but in that forum a bunch of them were going "if the 370z came out sooner" and "seems like I will go for the 370z as a next car" I meant no negative aspect about the car..I usually get heated when people make false accusations...not sure if you have had some serious seat time in a 370z or G37..but in those cars its cake to drive them at higher speeds...the RX8 takes a bit longer to a hundred..though I love the handling of both the RX8 and the S2000..they just dont do it for me with the lack of torque and power..
Im sorry if I came up a lil aggressive but if the OP comes in here and as his first post he says "test drove the Z...didnt feel that fast at all...Cayman S is awesomezzz"...then he should buy a cayman S instead of ranting about how the Z was a letdown at actual Z owners or how awesome a discontinued s2000 felt or how great a used 45k car felt..

gnarf 08-07-2009 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mook (Post 142431)
Actually, am selling MS3 and all set on buying 370Z.. Instead of reading all the trigger happy fan boy off-topic tirades, take a look at the actual posts.
:shakes head:

MS3 obviously is not a better car than 370Z. And my first post deals with all the shortcomings (steering feel, cheap transmission, fwd, top end drop off, etc).

If you really want to be anal about it, the "feel" is all about the torque, which is the ability to change speed, not in the HP, which is ability to maintain speed.
We have 280 lb torque @ 3000 rpm for MS3 vs 270lb @ 5200 for the Z.

Besides, the top hp in the Z comes at 7000, MS3 - much earlier @ 5,500 rpm. The gearing may also be a bit too tall in the Z contributing to the lack of low end "power feel".

To top it all, ms3 can be about 200lb lighter.

If you don't think 200lb is a big deal - put your mother in law in your trunk and drive around.

Put it all together, and on a straight line from a rolling start you get more excitement out of MS3. Now, if you actually enjoy getting creative in turns once in a while - there is no comparison. Drag race, same thing. Almost any tight RWD car has a huge advantage.

All in all at about 4000 rpm the 2 cars may feel about equally powerful but one has more weight.

Take a look at this comparo that I just found: Winding Road Magazine | Issue 46 - page 146 ("for the starters 370Z did not actually 'feel' that much faster than any of the others... The engine is adequately powerful, but doesn't feel as willing to rev or as potent as the horsepower numbers might lead you to believe...") Of course, they go on to say that 370Z is the best overall car, no doubt about it.

I don't understand why it's suddenly offensive to talk about shortcomings of a car. But hey, if everyone is so offended - I will go away.

dude i dont get this post at all...what are you trying to imply...you want to buy a 370z..but you give me an essay on how awesome the torque and power comes out sooner in the MS3, how its lighter, and then you take an article describing the lack of feel in the Z...i know you are trying to give me an understanding...and I know as a prospective owner you have the need to know the Z's shortcomings...but bringing up these negative posts while NOT being a Z owner will only turn you away from buying a 370z..Im sure youll be impressed once you own a Z...but hey if its not for you..there are plenty of choices that will fit your needs..

joeyz10 08-08-2009 07:55 PM

As I said before DONT WASTE TIME ON THIS IDIOT. He is just playing around. You know one of those who really Can't afford a car but just read the magazines and pissed off everyone. Ignore this Idiot Mook. th name Mook is already a start don't you think?

stag3 08-09-2009 12:07 AM

welp looks like no 370z for me, my car came in, went to drive it, awesome car , 19 miles on her. walk in to work out #'s.

i had already got a quote from danny at fontana nissan for 31,419 +ttl for the car (base pearl white with sport package, 6spd, splash guards, floor and trunk mats ). he was great to deal with, i guess the owner/gm didn't want the sale as they tried to make up the diff back in my trade-in.

here is the nada
Base Price $15,050 $16,250 $17,225 $20,150
------------ rough -- average-- clean--- retail

now the offers i've gotten in trade in from mitsubishi are 16.9
and lexus offered me 17k for my ms3

i waited to long and all the silver evo's are gone now :(
and i decided i didn't want to drive an automatic

didn't care about the apr as i was going to finance thru my credit union for 4.98%
only the bottom line prices mattered. well they offered me 12.5k lol i said you guys are giving me trade-in on a regular mazda3 hatchback, they came back with 13.5k and that was the highest they could go. if they gave me anywhere near what the other dealers were offering, i would have driven home in her.

i guess i can try to private party sell my car, but by then it will be gone as i waited about 3 mos for this one to arrive. good luck to everyone else looking.
to bad i couldn't get one :\

mdbrich 08-09-2009 01:29 AM

1

355890 08-09-2009 10:25 AM

Well ......... he got lots hits.....but then, that was the intention.

Santent 08-09-2009 11:19 AM

the s2000 is one of the ugliest cars i ever see on the road,, it looks like a POS with no curves, dull colors and probably even duller drivers.:gtfo2: of here z haters, go to your own bad site

mook 08-16-2009 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sand123 (Post 138854)
After reading through these 5 long pages, I feel like I need to submit my own opinion to tamper some of the dissention going on here. I currently drive a Mazdaspeed 3 (not a Mazda 3, like some have posted, that is a completely different car) and I carpool with a friend who drives an 06 Porsche Cayman S. I have also test driven and been looking at the 370Z.

I have driven all three of these cars. I am considering buying a 370Z which is why I am on this forum, and I am not "TROLLING" like Mook has been accused of. I do have to agree with Mook on the point that the Mazdaspeed3 (with minor bolt-ons makes close to 300 bhp) "feels" a bit faster than the 370Z and Cayman S because of the extra torque and more linear power delivery. However, the Cayman S is the better car (and faster car, though it did run a slower lap time than my MS3 at the autocross :). I've enjoyed driving the Porsche because of the RWD, and for that reason I test drove the Z recently, and have been considering trading in my Mazdaspeed3 for that car. It is mainly a function of having the rear wheel drive. As far as motor is concerned, I still prefer the MS3 motor (keeping in mind that I do have the bolt-on intake and midpipe which makes some extra power) because of the sheer wave of torque that it produces. But I like the RWD of the Z, and the shorter wheel base and handling characteristics. So overall I'm torn, and am having a difficult time choosing.

There seems to be a pretty biased feeling of superiority among Z owners against other manufacturers like Mazda, Honda, etc. The Mazdaspeed3 IS a great sports car; if you don't agree, check out the reviews on Automobile and Car and Driver. "This is a sports car folks, hang on and enjoy it," are the words from one article that I remember best. I know Z owners feel like they are in a different league, but you're still talking about cars that fall into the 25K to 30K price range and offer similar power to weight numbers. The Z is not a Ferrari and it is still a logical competitor against cars like the MS3 and WRX, STI, G37, Evo, etc. 30K will buy you any one of these cars.

I had dismissed the Z previously because the 350 was a slower car than the MS3 as far as power to weight and track times are concerned. But I love that the new 370Z is lighter AND stronger. So I am back in the market. But I just want to shed some light on this argument, and remember, never underestimate the competition!

If you are having hard time deciding and dont' care about track performance, like I was, test drive a certified pre-owned 06/07 BMW M Coupe. 07 will give you 4 years of warranty and 100,000 miles for $34-38k, 06 - $30-34k. And they will pay for your oil changes and brake pads for two years.
M3 engine, 330 hp / 262 lb (huge low end), 3200 lb and 50/50 weight, a real mechanical M3 LSD.
Check out this comparo by Brits, funny as hell: BMW Z4 M Coupe vs Porsche Cayman S - Feeling the burn - Top Gear

I bought mine two days ago. If the "feel" is what you are after and you want a rwd, this might be for you. No way it will beat Z on the track, except on the drag strip, but fun factor bests all the other cars I have driven. It feels like a beast, faster than the Mazda and it has the M3 engine so don't worry about low end, lol. In sport mode and traction control off, it demands lots of driver input. If Z is the real life hero, M coupe is a comic book hero. No match for the real thing, but a lot more fun. Although, some mags listed 4.4 to 60 in the M Roadster, coups a bit slower. Oh, and it comes with concierge button - lol. Just don't expect the same fuel efficiency as the Z

Ankur194 08-26-2009 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Santent (Post 144689)
the s2000 is one of the ugliest cars i ever see on the road,, it looks like a POS with no curves, dull colors and probably even duller drivers.:gtfo2: of here z haters, go to your own bad site

This is one of the most retarded statments ever.

It is a super clean design which has plenty of curves, looks substantial, aggressive, and has aged very well.

I own an S2000 now and used to have a 350z Roadster. Never driven a 370z yet so cant compare, but S2000 is a much funner car than my 350 was. When I get in my S2k I feel like i "put it on" and not got in (if that makes sense to anyone). The 350 was not the same, not to say it was bad, just different. The 350 felt faster (Torque) and was way more comfortable. Really its a matter of prefrence of what you like, and from the reviews Ive read about the 370 it seems to emulate a similar connection with the driver that the s2k does, but also has the comfort/power, and thats why Im considering getting one as my next ride.

Everyone also must remember S2000 is a 10 year old design with nearly half the engine size. Yet even today it hangs with he best of them. This does say alot about what kind of car it is.

Santent's statement is just as "boy racer" as saying a sup'd up econobox = sports car

bullitt5897 08-26-2009 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ankur194 (Post 170429)
This is one of the most retarded statments ever.

It is a super clean design which has plenty of curves, looks substantial, aggressive, and has aged very well.

I own an S2000 now and used to have a 350z Roadster. Never driven a 370z yet so cant compare, but S2000 is a much funner car than my 350 was. When I get in my S2k I feel like i "put it on" and not got in (if that makes sense to anyone). The 350 was not the same, not to say it was bad, just different. The 350 felt faster (Torque) and was way more comfortable. Really its a matter of prefrence of what you like, and from the reviews Ive read about the 370 it seems to emulate a similar connection with the driver that the s2k does, but also has the comfort/power, and thats why Im considering getting one as my next ride.

Everyone also must remember S2000 is a 10 year old design with nearly half the engine size. Yet even today it hangs with he best of them. This does say alot about what kind of car it is.

Santent's statement is just as "boy racer" as saying a sup'd up econobox = sports car

I remember my 07 s2000 it was a blast!!! I mean serious track junkie canyon cutter!!! I did several long drive 12+ hrs and it was insanely uncomfortable (I dont stop except for gas). I remember getting out of the car to fill up and my gf at the time was like wats wrong with you... ( I looked like a 6'2" hunch back lol) I loved that car but I tell you what I love the 370z even more! I wished I would have saved the $15k in mods on the s for the 370z! Its just as fun as the S but with tons more power! I am still part of the local s2k club and we do track days. lol lets just say I got a bunch of flak at the beginning of the Z's first track day but by the time the day was over no one wanted to mess with the Z... I had to call one of the guys a P**** (More like Yelled out in the pits "Walter you P**** get your a** on the track and come play! Your all talk and no action ya big P****!) just to get him to join my session and play cat and mouse! I wooped his butt all over the track! :rofl2:

Enjoy the S and when you want to upgrade the Z awaits you!:excited:

wakesnow 08-30-2009 06:18 AM

Laptimes RX8, S2000, Mazdaspeed 3, 370Z, Cayman
 
Laguna Seca Laptimes

MotorTrend 6/2007: Test Driver Max Angellini (Pro Driver)

1:54.990 Honda Civic SI
1:51.733 Mini Cooper S JC Works GP
1:50.738 Honda S2000
1:50.375 Mazdaspeed3 GT
1:49:038 BMW335i
1:47.926 Mitsubishi Evolution IX MR
1:47.577 Porsche Cayman S
1:45.818 Lotus Exige S
1:40.919 Chevrolet Corvette (C6) Z06
1:39.517 Porsche 911 (997) GT3

MotorTrend 10/2008: Test Driver Randy Pobst (Pro Driver)

1:51.977 Mini Coope S (2nd Gen)
1:50.418 Mazda RX8
1:47.751 Chevrolet Cobalt SS
1:47.713 Mitsubishi Evo MR (Evo X)
1:44.716 Ford Shelby GT500KR
1:42.964 BMW M3 (E92)
1:42.507 Porsche 911 (997) Turbo
1:40.920 Audi R8
1:40.453 Nissan GTR
1:35.117 Dodge Viper ACR

MotorTrend 10/2009: Test Driver Randy Pobst (Pro Driver)

1:52.200 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata
1:46.500 2010 Nissan Nismo 370Z
1:46.000 2009 BMW 135i
1:45.700 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS
1:45.400 2010 Jaguar XFR
1:44.400 2010 Shelby GT500
1:43.900 2009 Cadillac CTS-V
1:43.000 2009 Porsche Cayman S PDK
1:40.800 2009 Audi R8
1:35.800 2009 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1

Looks like the 370Z is a pretty decent value, that being said Nissan Motor Co really needs to get off their butt and install a real LSD, appropriate coolers for the Oil/Tranny/Power Steering and real seats on the Nismo to turn it into a proper car that can be tracked reliably.

Just my 2 cents.

Equinox 09-29-2009 04:00 PM

I just sold my 400whp Mazdaspeed3 GT and bought a 370z. The sports car feel of of the 370z caught me by surprise. Low, raked windshield, big wing (nismo), rear wheel wag with tcs off, but by far, my mazdaspeed was way more satisfying, and fast :(

Nick911sc 09-29-2009 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Equinox (Post 217433)
I just sold my 400whp Mazdaspeed3 GT and bought a 370z. The sports car feel of of the 370z caught me by surprise. Low, raked windshield, big wing (nismo), rear wheel wag with tcs off, but by far, my mazdaspeed was way more satisfying, and fast :(

Of course it's going to be slower..You're comparing 400whp to 350bhp? No shock there...And the Nismo seems to be slower than the base lol

And might I ask a list of mods?

400whp sounds a lot for the MS3 unless you rebuilt the motor...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2