![]() |
http://www.caradvice.com.au/37362/ni...ngines-report/
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Grand Prix of Endurance
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,476
Drives: Mulsanne Straight
Rep Power: 26 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
__________________
![]() We can do without any article of luxury we have never had; but once obtained, it is not in human nature to surrender it voluntary. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
|
![]()
It could be possible. The main questions should be, It could be cost effective for the costumers? Market? How much people would pay for it? It will be in a competitive price vs aftermarket TT kits?
Definitely, all question could be Yes. People will be glad to pay for a 370z TT that would be covered under Nissan Warranty, maybe in a price range close to a 40 to 50K (at the most). That will, obviously, put in a rocket the reputation of Nissan, it will put the 370z in a level that never could imagine. 1) GT-R, a brutal performance car that is in a "affordable" range, putting Nissan Brand Name in a upper level scale with Ferrari, Porsche, Lamborghini, etc... Maybe not to many people consider the GT-R an exotic looking car, but anyway. 2) Nissan 370z TT, will put another sight of Nissan capabilities to the extreme at a well costumer concern value. Now lets put Value Engineering at work, Material Testing, etc... I think, that if this car is built, the GT-R would be the most affected. So I believe, everything with the 370z with a TT V6 is possible, but it will not, in my opinion, affordable to build for Nissan because of the GT-R at the market, unless they build a new engine for the GT-R, a V8 4.5L already developed for the 350z Xanavi, But again, it will increase in who never know in what level the price of the GT-R, probably... But who knows, they also have a fully built platform with a VQ30DETT V6, so they can continue from there. ![]() I think that is the same issue happening with Mitsubishi, Eclipse vs Evolution (I don't know much about this issue, so if I am wrong, feel free to correct me ![]() Last edited by o0javi0o; 08-05-2009 at 06:49 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
|
![]()
Displacement is an American thing and with Emissions you will see more and more turbo charged cars with small displacement to keep power up within tighter emission regulations.
Who ever thought the Camaro would come with a four cylinder turbo. Not here yet but its coming....
__________________
'09 370Z - '93 300ZX Vert - '83 280ZX - '83 280ZXT -'81 280ZXT stroker - '72 240Z - Stillen CBE, HFC, G3, Grounding Kit, Sways // Swift Spring // H&R 15mm // 5% Tint // Clear Bra // ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: tx
Posts: 199
Drives: 08 altima 3.5se
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
The z has a history of increased displacement. Its japanese heritage car. 240z 2.4L 280z 2.8L 300zx 3.0L 350Z 3.5L. 370z 3.7L As you can see we been through to gas crisis. The war on emissions is 30 years plus and the Z displacement continues growing. 40 years of tradition. The Z is not the only car to see increased displacement from japan either. But being this is a Z forum. This suits best. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NE
Age: 40
Posts: 649
Drives: cars
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
![]()
I doubt that they will put a twin in a similar motor to what they have now, if they did at all it would probably be around a 3.0L V6 that pushes 350-370 hp for fuel economy, along with a nice power bump...and keeping it under $40k. I would seriously doubt Nissan would create two models that directly compete with each other performance-wise when one would be considerably cheaper than the other. That is why the AWD G37 Coupe is kept down on HP...
__________________
Range Rover Sport Supercharged Nissan 370z Touring + Sport |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Ark
Posts: 2,357
Drives: '09 370z
Rep Power: 22 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
While I would love to see a TT version of the 370z, the best we will probably see is a hybrid model. Truth be told, I honestly feel this is the best route to take and in the best interest of both Nissan as a brand and for the 370z as a car. My reasoning is this.
The 370z is listed at 332hp out of a N/A 3.7L engine and gets between 19 and 26 mpg(if memory serves). Pricing is $30k - $40k. RWD platform. The GTR (Nissan's flagship vehicle) is listed at 480hp out of a TT 3.8L engine and gets between 18 and 21 mpg. Pricing is in the $80k neighborhood and I'm leaving out the V-spec model (is there a NISMO model?). AWD platform. Nothing new here, we have all known this for a long time. So on one hand you have Nissan's more affordable sports car, the 370z, and on the other hand you have Nissan's less affordable sports car, the GTR. This is where the problem starts because both cars are pure-bred sports cars (GTR less so imo, but I'm not arguing over a definition ![]() Quick business 101 lesson, its business suicide to have 2 in-house products competing with each other for the same market share as they cut into the companies profit margins. I know most of us here understand this concept, but some do not, so there it is. Anyway, Nissan's saving grace and why they are able to offer the market 2 pure-bred sports cars revolves around the TT engine of the GTR. Think about it. How much hp would that 3.8L engine make WITHOUT the TT's? 350hp? Maybe 370hp? I honestly couldn't tell you because I am not educated in these things, but how many people out there would buy the GTR with its $80k price tag if it only produced 370hp? How many would buy it for $70k? $60k? See what's happening? The GTR is losing its luster and appeal, all the while coming closer to the 370z in price and competing for the same customers as the 370z. In the end, Nissan loses money this way and one car will chopped from the line-up. So!!! The solution is put a TT on the GTR, bump it to having almost 500hp, charge $80k for it while marketing the GTR as a super-car killer for half the price of a super-car and boom, the GTR and 370z are in separate market segments due to pricing while still appealing to the general "I love sports cars" market segment. Quick tangent here and I may be wrong. This may be the partial reason for Nissan discontinuing the S family... ![]() Anyway, back on point, this is partly why we will probably never see a TT model 370z. However, if by some miracle Nissan upgrades the GTR's powerplant to a V-8, and probably 550hp, while bringing the GTR's current V-6 into the Z line to replace the VQ engine (please, PLEASE do this Nissan), I think we could see one. On a similar note, if Nissan DID release a TT model 370z, chances are they would be capping the engine output (I am assuming they would keep the 3.7L VQ) to probably no more than 400hp and who wouldn’t be upset about that when you consider they also have a 3.8L engine pushing 480hp with a similar setup? It would just be frustrating… However, if they didn’t bump the price much (I am thinking fully loaded ending up like $45k MSRP because remember, it has to stay in the “affordable” category) it could work. That’s enough TT talk, so I will move onto why I think the hybrid idea is the way to go. Hybrid technology is probably going to be coming to “maturity” pretty soon and considering how obsessed the world has become with the whole “Go green” concept (and rightly so imo) it is a cash cow marketing idea to get in on the forefront. After seeing the article about a potential hybrid 370z in 2011, I think Nissan is on the right track with this one. If they manage to successfully combine the current 370z with electric technology as they want to do, everyone wins and reaps the benefits. The responsible side of us gets to sleep easy at night knowing we got great gas mileage because of our electric motors while contributing very little to pollution and the child side of us gets to wake up happy in the morning knowing that outside we have a wonderful toy to play with that is even faster because of the electric motors. There are some other points I could bring up supporting the idea of a hybrid z, but this is already too long for my liking so my apologies for the wall of text. [EDIT] I failed at copying this back from Microsoft Word. ![]() Last edited by Spikuh; 08-08-2009 at 05:13 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: tx
Posts: 199
Drives: 08 altima 3.5se
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Its purely technical. With a new awd system under the car changes have to be made in the cars underbody including a more restrictive exhaust set up, which makes for a different ECU program. Not to mention now power is being introduced to 4 wheels instead of 2 which makes power numbers distribute differently. Another factor is weight. The awd is heavier so weight to displacement you will find another smaller drop in horsepower. You can easily restore the power lost in the awd in the aftermarket. But for nissan to replace partts and keep numbers the same would bring price up to less desireable numbers. Besides all those numbers on the vq are so slightly spread. What u r saying doesn't make much sense in a marketing sense. 370z 332hp. G37coupe 330hp. G37 sedan 328hp. G37awd is like what 320-325hp? A difference of 12hp. All these cars have the same exact engines. They are programmed slightly differently for different functions and have different exhausts as stated B4 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: tx
Posts: 199
Drives: 08 altima 3.5se
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]()
One other thing. The GT-R and Z no matter the price are NOT COMPETITORS.
370 IS A 2 SEAT SPORTS CAR. GT-R is a 2+2 GRAND TOURING CAR. YOU GUYS SEE THE NUMBERS ONLY. ITS LIKE TO MOST OF YOU, DRIVING DYNAMICS HAVE NO BEARING ON WATS COMPETITION N WHAT ISN'T. YOU KNOW THAT THERE ARE DEDICATED GT ENTHUSIASTS THAT WOULDN'T BE CAUGHT DEAD IN A 2 SEATER AND VICE-VERSA. AND STILL. ITS FUNNY HOW PEOPLE ARE STUCK ON THE POWER BEING CLOSE BUT NEVER STOPPED TO THINK ON THIS VERY OBVIOUS ALTERNATIVE ISSUE. Its like comparing a truck and a van. Both are big. Both haul, but both are of a different breed. N bought for different reasons. The gt is the long term endurance car. The sports car is a shorter term track car. On the civilian side if u r a road tripper. And still want your sports car power while sacrificing about 10% of overall performance. (Not always true but the general consensus) You buy a gt. You can cram up to 3 people in it n u usually have a small but useable trunk. Enough for 2 suitcases n a small duffel. A sports car is usually your "chillen car". 1 extra seat. Tighter wheelbase. Almost no trunk(mostly not always) no room for long trip storage and short on luxury features a GT would usually have. (Not always true these days.) Tighter suspension set up. Lower to ground. Way smaller overall. The sports car and the GT are both very engaging excellent handling cars BUT there is an obvious DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE TWO. THEY DO NOT! DIRECTLY COMPETE. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Ark
Posts: 2,357
Drives: '09 370z
Rep Power: 22 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Your argument makes no sense to me because both vehicles appeal to the same general category of car people. Yes there are GT people who wouldn't be caught dead in a 2 seater and vise versa, but the majority of customers have no such excentricities. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: tx
Posts: 199
Drives: 08 altima 3.5se
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]()
One other thing. The GT-R and Z no matter the price are NOT COMPETITORS.
370 IS A 2 SEAT SPORTS CAR. GT-R is a 2+2 GRAND TOURING CAR. YOU GUYS SEE THE NUMBERS ONLY. ITS LIKE TO MOST OF YOU, DRIVING DYNAMICS HAVE NO BEARING ON WATS COMPETITION N WHAT ISN'T. YOU KNOW THAT THERE ARE DEDICATED GT ENTHUSIASTS THAT WOULDN'T BE CAUGHT DEAD IN A 2 SEATER AND VICE-VERSA. AND STILL. ITS FUNNY HOW PEOPLE ARE STUCK ON THE POWER BEING CLOSE BUT NEVER STOPPED TO THINK ON THIS VERY OBVIOUS ALTERNATIVE ISSUE. Its like comparing a truck and a van. Both are big. Both haul, but both are of a different breed. N bought for different reasons. The gt is the long term endurance car. The sports car is a shorter term track car. On the civilian side if u r a road tripper. And still want your sports car power while sacrificing about 10% of overall performance. (Not always true but the general consensus) You buy a gt. You can cram up to 3 people in it n u usually have a small but useable trunk. Enough for 2 suitcases n a small duffel. A sports car is usually your "chillen car". 1 extra seat. Tighter wheelbase. Almost no trunk(mostly not always) no room for long trip storage and short on luxury features a GT would usually have. (Not always true these days.) Tighter suspension set up. Lower to ground. Way smaller overall. The sports car and the GT are both very engaging excellent handling cars BUT there is an obvious DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE TWO. THEY DO NOT! DIRECTLY COMPETE. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can you get to 400 without turbo or super-charger | Q_USAF | Engine & Drivetrain | 193 | 03-15-2023 02:18 PM |
Will we see a SINGLE turbo kit? | Brazilbro | Forced Induction | 17 | 07-03-2009 04:03 PM |
Turbo Kit - For all you techies | DinoJ | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 6 | 06-05-2009 12:47 PM |
Got turbo? | NotmyGTR | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 17 | 05-19-2009 08:52 AM |
M3 To Get Turbo | nogoodname | Other Vehicles | 5 | 05-09-2009 12:43 AM |