![]() |
Originally Posted by robones By your logic, then is the GTR not considered a sports car? Wait, isn't it an SUV? Seats four and 4WD or does it lack utility?
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: California
Posts: 10,709
Drives: 370Z T/S/N 6MT & XKE
Rep Power: 3844 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Wait, isn't it an SUV? Seats four and 4WD or does it lack utility? ![]()
__________________
"Does the carpet match the drapes? NO!!! I don't date bald women." ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | ||
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Surface of the sun.
Posts: 13,159
Drives: '18 GTI Autobahn DSG
Rep Power: 1388 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
From the almighty Wikipedia (because no one can change that, right?
![]() Quote:
Quote:
I wouldn't quite count any Mini in on being a sports car, in my opinion. Nor a Scion. Last edited by Haboob; 09-28-2012 at 03:01 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: L.I., NY
Posts: 5,307
Drives: Everything
Rep Power: 26 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
|2013 Audi S4|Ibis White/Black|S-Tronic P+| |2013 370z|PearlWhite/Persimmon|Touring/Sport/Nav|F.I. CBE 18" CF| |Sold|2011 370z|Gun Metallic|Touring/Sport/Nav| |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) | ||
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 330
Drives: 2011 Nissan 370Z
Rep Power: 15 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Based solely on looks and sitting in the driver seat, I have to give the Mini Cooper coupe the thumbs down. I prefer the regular Coopers in the looks department. I find the coupes to be absolutely hideous. I have driven my friend's Cooper and it's a fun little car. But our assessment did not include driving it so I did not take anything into account except for the superficial. Sooooo uglyyyyy: ![]() Nope. Quote:
Maybe, maybe not ![]() Funny that you ask. It was a slow day at work a few weeks ago and I saw an email in my spam folder with the title, "Get paid to give us your thoughts on sports cars!" So I figured what the heck and clicked on the survey. A few days later, someone called and left a message on my Google Voice account (never use your cell phone in case it's real spam) and they sounded legit. I called back and the next thing I know, I was sitting in some room with other car folks.
__________________
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14859 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Honestly... I think you messed up a perfectly good opportunity because of your highly limited Fanboy thinking. You had the chance to drive 4 excellent platforms and compare differences between cars objectively and blew to be a fanboy????? Seriously?????
![]() RWD is the defined form of sports car. Being that they had varying drivetrains. They needed an evo n wrx there... You could have tested all cars and given your objective preference in the end and draw an educated conclusion going from car to car. Just because a Drivetrain is different does not discount it a real sports car. The only reason why RWD is considered first in sports is because in the beginning of auto history. The first cars were RWD. In laws of physics, RWD does carry more advantages overall. But put it on certain tracks against an AWD car and RWD is rendered useless as a sports car. Your thinking is narrow. As far as the genesis coupe being soulless? Have you ever driven one? I have. I can say this much. It drives better than a G37s (which I owned before) and not as well as a Z. Transmission responsiveness is questionable under certain sport driving conditions. Getting a tune takes most of that out. Wow... ![]() Last edited by UNKNOWN_370; 09-28-2012 at 09:01 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Zion, Illinois
Posts: 1,873
Drives: '09 370Z-T BS M6
Rep Power: 20 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
That also said, drivetrain ultimately does not matter whatsoever; a properly tuned AWD car can hold its own versus a RWD car, and vice versa. To say either has an advantage on tarmac is a bit ignorant, I think. I suppose if you wanted to go offroad... The Genesis has become more of a competitor in recent years (now that their 3.8 V6 makes 35x horse, instead of the ridiculously anemic < 320 hp of previous generation). It is around the same weight and delivers similar power and torque. Unfortunately, I have never been a fan of Hyundais as they are always prone to breaking down and they often steal styling cues from other manufacturers (although not so much anymore). They're still ugly IMO, and especially their newest model, where the facelift looked more like a botched plastic surgery job. I really don't know how it compares to Samsung, who makes appliances and electronics... and fine ones at that, lol. That Galaxy S3, bro! Beats the piss out of Apple's stupid iPhone anyday. BRZ would be considered a sports car, although it fits in a class more so with the Miata instead of the 370Z. The power difference is too massive. I'm sure it can handle just as well, but the lack of power is something too much. I suppose on that note that the Cayman also is pretty much the same class (wasn't the Z supposed to fight the Cayman while the GT-R fights the 911?). It's still pretty heavy IIRC and I suppose they're fine cars. At least they don't depreciate like Boxsters do. Also, a tC and a Cooper? LOL. I think the focus group was just for sporty cars in general; there's no way a tC could EVER be called a sports car. The only one of notable mention is Rado's tC, but that's just a shell now. Indeed, the Coupe-rs (sorry, lol, it's what I do) are simply ugly. The boxy look worked fine... just extending the doors would have been a fine path. Instead they do some weird mix between a box car and a coupe. Gross. Sports cars must have two seats. Drivetrain is irrelevant in my opinion (although you'll find I agree more that a car is a sports car if it is RWD), but two seats and two doors. Completely agree with you on that point.
__________________
-Phil "Since one of my brake light bulbs just went out, the forum told me that my piston rings are about to blow." Last edited by 370Z Purist; 09-28-2012 at 09:43 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: California
Posts: 10,709
Drives: 370Z T/S/N 6MT & XKE
Rep Power: 3844 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
1992 American Heritage Dictionary: Sports car: An automobile equipped for racing, especially an aerodynamically shaped one or two passenger vehicle having a low center of gravity and steering and suspension designed for precise control at high speeds. Additionally, Men and women were defined by their reproductive organs at birth, not by mutilated genitalia later in life. Ask Mr. Garrison I am not confused as to what a man, woman or car is. .
__________________
"Does the carpet match the drapes? NO!!! I don't date bald women." ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 121 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
I like this one better: Main Entry: sports car Function: noun Date: 1928 : a low small usually 2-passenger automobile designed for quick response, easy maneuverability, and high-speed driving |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 121 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Drivetrain is irrelevant, number of seats is not? You've got your priorities in the wrong place. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
370Z Focus Group 08.21.08 in West Los Angeles, California | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 1 | 07-26-2012 08:34 AM |
370Z Focus Group 08.21.08 in West Los Angeles, California | AK370Z | Exterior & Interior | 6 | 07-02-2010 04:38 PM |
370Z Focus Group 08.21.08 in West Los Angeles, California | AK370Z | Brakes & Suspension | 0 | 10-02-2008 03:26 PM |
370Z Focus Group 08.21.08 in West Los Angeles, California | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z Pricing / Ordering Discussions | 0 | 10-02-2008 03:24 PM |
370Z Focus Group 08.21.08 in West Los Angeles, California | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 0 | 10-02-2008 03:23 PM |