![]() |
Originally Posted by cossie1600 I was on your side until I went car shopping the last two months. The prices were roughly the same for my Z and the Cube
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 121 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: californee way
Posts: 5,380
Drives: 370, Leaf
Rep Power: 31 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I just showed it to you on my Prius, I will show you another one. How about that?
Blackbook listed my Lexus as such, KBB has it listed at $1K+ lower. How is that higher? Black Book Trade-In as of 10/29/2012 Clean Average Rough Base $39,570 $37,110 $31,105 Options $750 $750 $750 Mileage ($2,250) ($1,600) ($1,075) Total $38,070 $36,260 $30,780 Excellent $36,510 Very Good $35,710 Good $34,410 Fair $30,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | ||
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 121 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Are you aware that the online black book site isn't black book value? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: californee way
Posts: 5,380
Drives: 370, Leaf
Rep Power: 31 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's deemed good enough to use by the bank, that matters. Regardless, most banks use blackbook and NADA, not KBB. I was simply saying KBB has lower their numbers in order to possibly scam consumers since most people use that as a reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tampa
Posts: 4,142
Drives: 13' Magma Red Nismo
Rep Power: 7336 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Here Red_Zed, used your source. I used competing 2011 models as this is what we both have been referring to. I loaded all models with options to guarantee they are in a similar price range when new. Please explain why my results are different than yours using two different tools. And yes, those are straight from their site and printed to PDF, go ahead and check if I manipulated the numbers. You don't have to reply after reading unless you want to add to your posting numbers.
Oh and it was post 103 where I claimed the 370Z resale value was good and you refuted, then proceeded to paste unsourced information.
__________________
Old Car:GTM TSC'd 550whp / 410lbft tq @ 11.88PSI
New Car: Under Construction ![]() Last edited by SS_Firehawk; 10-30-2012 at 12:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 121 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Broadly speaking, the numbers are different because you outfitted the cars differently than I did, and you failed to include the Msrp numbers to obscure that Of course, your post does nothing but prove me right. The z is on par with competitors, not "possessing the highest residual value in the industry" as you claim. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|