![]() |
Originally Posted by SS_Firehawk Your spreadsheet needs a starting price. Cars at a higher price losing the same % in residual value in comparison to another vehicle that is more
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 121 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Using KBB prices is enough argument against your point. Try looking at auction prices vs actual price paid, rather than comparing Msrp to KBB excellent. The number of cars sold for KBB's excellent price can probably be counted on one hand. Try actually selling the car, then re-evaluate EDIT, for fun, here is depreciation as a percentage of MSRP and average purchase price. MSRP ||5 year depreciation (per NADA) ||residual (vs MSRP) ||average purchase price new ||TC residual 2011 370z $31,450 || $18,302|| 0.418060413 || $31,296 || 0.4200 GSR $34,095 || $19,204|| 0.436750257 || $33,080 || 0.4497 MR $38,090 ||$21,302 || 0.440745603 || $35,380 || 0.4686 All based on NADA to keep things fair Last edited by Red__Zed; 10-28-2012 at 06:59 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|