|
Problem with your opinion, Armen, is its based off junk you don't understand. Don't come to a debate if you don't even understand the vehicles you're debating. Seriously? Evo's are
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-08-2009, 12:07 PM
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 8,465
Drives: No cars; only bikes
Rep Power: 54    |
Problem with your opinion, Armen, is its based off junk you don't understand.
Don't come to a debate if you don't even understand the vehicles you're debating. Seriously? Evo's are Auto-only, now? Now that you're knowledge about an Evo's handling has been proven far inferior, you're back peddling right into the, "Well, at least the 370 LOOKS better" angle. So if RWD is superior than AWD, then FWD should be horrible, right? How did a FWD Cobalt kick some Ralliart/WRX ***? Better yet, how did the Cobalt SS/TC do so well in Car and Drivers 2008 Lightning lap? It almost beat every single car that was in the next class ABOVE it! All in the far "inferior" FWD. The long and short of all this is, there far more that goes into a car than you understand. Its not always about the drive line configuration and nothing but. You barely know how to drive stick and you think you can make claims like yours?
__________________
I don't own a car anymore. Last edited by MightyBobo; 08-08-2009 at 12:15 PM. |
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
