![]() |
Thank goodness you two have uncovered the deciding factor between the two cars: my AGE But you are correct, 1985 is not the year in which I was born. I'm
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 30
Drives: Warp
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Thank goodness you two have uncovered the deciding factor between the two cars: my AGE
But you are correct, 1985 is not the year in which I was born. I'm not complaining about the car's weight, but you're fooling yourself if you think the 370Z is a lightweight by any measure. It's a small, compact 2-seat sports car, yes, but it's heavy for its class. It's heavier than almost all of its true sports car peers, and weighs as much as the bloated, 5 seat Camry or Accord sedans (4-cyl versions). Now, the Z is slick in that it carries its weight very well, better than any other car I can think of and in fact it's rather impressive how well it handles, especially at this price. Nissan's engineers should be commended. The price is the key here, no sports car can match its performance at anything close to the Z's price. But price is a double edged sword here, and the modular FM platform that allows Nissan to build/sell Z's at such a low cost is the very cause for it's relatively high curb weight for the class. Modular design opens many, many design/production doors, shaves considerable $$ off production costs, but it also forces you to design products "within a box" which does not come without trade offs. The trade off here is more weight than should be necessary, but it keeps the cost down. Weight is the reason the car can only approach, but never equal the dynamics of its benchmark, the Porsche Cayman. I understand folks like their cars here; the 370Z is a compelling product, and I'm trying to work a deal for one like I stated. But if you start taking an observation (not even a criticism) about the car (ie. its weight) personally, you might have issues....
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Track Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Nevada
Posts: 689
Drives: 280z, 300zx, Vette
Rep Power: 274 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Agreed. the Z could lose a bit of weight but what other car that packs 300+hp and costs less than 40k weight's less than 3200lbs? You won't really find one. It's not so much that the Z is light, it's just that compared to some competiors like the Genesis, Camaro, Mustang, etc the Z is on the lighter side. Cars in general just need to lose weight but it costs money as you already pointed out. Still I understand your point about having sedans weight the same or less than the Z (example 2012 impreza at 3150lbs).
Also looking back to the Z's history the 370z isn't doing bad, which is what I was trying to point out. The Z has stayed right around 3200-3400lbs since 1984 dispite consistantly getting larger engines, beefer tranys, heavier differentials, bigger wheels/tires, and lets not forget....being safer in collisions while at the same time being able to play your ipod. I think for being able to keep the Z at this current range of weight for the last 30yrs is pretty decent. Also to answer your original questions about the sunroof, probably the biggest deciding factor for Nissan was chasis rigidity. Cars with sunroofs, targas, and t-tops have less rigity which affects handling. When Nissan designed the 370z their main target was the porsche. They wanted to make a car that could rival the porsche around the track for half the cost. Having that extra big of rigidity on the roof helps keep the car from twisting which in turn makes the car handle better in turns. |
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Track Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Nevada
Posts: 689
Drives: 280z, 300zx, Vette
Rep Power: 274 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
[QUOTE=ClevelandCWRU;1209761]
The price is the key here, no sports car can match its performance at anything close to the Z's price. QUOTE] I guess it depends on your definition of sports car but the Mustang GT actually matches the Z pretty well in all areas except acceleration which it utterly destroys the Z. The new mustang GT, especially with brembo and track pack, will get along an auto-x course just as fast as the Z. And it you can get a mustang for slighly less than a Z. Then again if you are talking about purely 2 seater cars, well then really the Z has no competitor as there is only the miata and cayman and Vette. In the price range of the Z there really isn't anything to compete with. |
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: californee way
Posts: 5,380
Drives: 370, Leaf
Rep Power: 32 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
[QUOTE=280z/300zx;1209796]Easy on the kool-aid, there is a reason why one is a FS and the other one is a CS car. The difference will be small, but I am not sure I would put the money on the Mustang every time.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,393
Drives: 11 370 6mt pw w/sp
Rep Power: 18 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
[QUOTE=280z/300zx;1209796]
Quote:
The Mustang does have impressive numbers, but EVERYONE owns one. I don't see the fun in having something that isn't somewhat orginal with all the cars on the road. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,926
Drives: 2006 350Z
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
[QUOTE=Methodical4u;1210140]
Quote:
![]() I've only seen one....on TV!
__________________
keep Chubbs in your pocket - Chubbs Last edited by Lug; 07-09-2011 at 02:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 30
Drives: Warp
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
[QUOTE=Lug;1210573]
Quote:
![]() I admit I haven't driven the new Mustang GT with the 5.0. I did check out the Camaro SS and gave it a big X. The exterior is simply gorgeous IMHO, the interior, however, does not cut it for me. It feels cheap and looks bad to me. What's worse is it's like sitting in a bunker. Never sat in one? You can have a similar experience by putting a cardboard copy paper box over your head and look out through the handle cut out. The SS is surely a fast and capable car, but the experience is vague compared to the 370Z and GC. I could get over that, but not the interior or lack of visibility. Maybe I'll check out the 5.0GT, but I'm pretty sold on the Z for now. Just need to find the time to get back to the dealership... |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: californee way
Posts: 5,380
Drives: 370, Leaf
Rep Power: 32 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
[QUOTE=Methodical4u;1210140]VQ engines are virtually in every Nissan cars, you need to lay off the kool-aid too. 2nd gen RX-8s are more rare than 370, I have a tough time thinking anyone would dare to say the RX-8 is a better car. It's a car at the end of the day.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: californee way
Posts: 5,380
Drives: 370, Leaf
Rep Power: 32 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
[QUOTE=hansoac;1212172]
Quote:
The Eight Slowest-Selling Cars - Mazda RX-8 - Automobile Magazine |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Port Washington, WI
Age: 49
Posts: 183
Drives: 2004 RX-8
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
[QUOTE=cossie1600;1212973]
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: usa
Posts: 44
Drives: 335i/x5/TL
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
[QUOTE=Methodical4u;1210140]you act like you drive a ferrari, just wait the 370z will just be like the 350z. I see 350z everywhere, not everyone is in a rush to buy a two seater right now. Get off your high horse thinking your special cause you bought a $30k+ sports car and thinking your original.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Windermere, FL
Posts: 1,618
Drives: '13 XKR-S, '10 370Z
Rep Power: 20 ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mustang vs. 370Z vs. Genesis Coupe | phelan | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 61 | 05-19-2010 05:54 PM |
| Decided on a Genesis Coupe 3.8 Track over the 370.. here is why. | nurburgring | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 132 | 11-03-2009 05:18 PM |
| First Test: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 Track | Educ8r | Other Vehicles | 9 | 03-08-2009 04:31 PM |
| Comparison Test: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 vs. 2009 Infiniti G37 Coupe | mattkim85 | Other Vehicles | 3 | 03-01-2009 12:53 AM |