03-03-2011, 10:52 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Long Island
Posts: 5,059
Drives: slowwww
Rep Power: 30
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffblue
it honestly just seems totally random to a certain extent. one would think a 94 300zx twin turbo would cost more to insure for a 22 year old than an 89 cherokee, but alas, it makes no sense. the quote i got for the 300 is 645, which is less than the thousand you paid for the cherokee.
|
I was 17 at the time. No credit whatsoever and less than a year of driving, so that might have had something to do with it.
__________________
[09][MB][6-Spd MT][Touring][Stillen Gen III][K&N][Borla CBE][Evo-R]
|
|
|
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
