03-03-2011, 10:51 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: LA. not L.a.
Posts: 21,652
Drives: Z34 Tour/Sport
Rep Power: 179
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffblue
it honestly just seems totally random to a certain extent. one would think a 94 300zx twin turbo would cost more to insure for a 22 year old than an 89 cherokee, but alas, it makes no sense. the quote i got for the 300 is 645, which is less than the thousand you paid for the cherokee.
|
When i first went to allstate from my last insure. com. they told me the only car on their uninsure list was the 300zx i don't remember the year of the Z. They said it was due to it's poor performance in the crash test, and higher theft rate.
__________________
"These Violent Delights Have Violent Ends"
|
|
|
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
