|
DO NOT use 87 unless you like engine damage. You'll get pre-detonation out the pooper. I mistakenly ran 89 for a couple of tanks and it ran like crap. I
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-18-2010, 07:52 PM
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kentuck-IANA
Age: 62
Posts: 4,887
Drives: '09 370 & ‘14 Juke
Rep Power: 27410   |
DO NOT use 87 unless you like engine damage. You'll get pre-detonation out the pooper.
I mistakenly ran 89 for a couple of tanks and it ran like crap. I also ran a test on my old Celica (11 1/2 to 1 compression) by running "plus" (89 octane). My mileage actually dropped drastically enough that it was cheaper to run 91 or 93. |
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fuel Economy | tdd1986 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 37 | 09-26-2010 11:46 AM |
| 50-75% improved fuel economy news story... 'supercritical fuel inejctors' | travisjb | Engine & Drivetrain | 4 | 05-21-2010 11:54 AM |
| Fuel Filler Tube Coating Flaking Off Into Fuel Tank | SoCal 370Z | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 12 | 02-02-2010 10:37 AM |
| Fuel Economy...WTF? | spearfish25 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 28 | 07-08-2009 06:05 PM |
| Question about air/fuel | zZSportZz | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 9 | 06-15-2009 04:59 PM |
Threaded Mode
