![]() |
Originally Posted by Jordo! 2. It runs very rich approaching fuel cut; rich mixtures cool the combustion chamber with unburnt fuel, and acts as an anti-detonant. You've more reading to
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 1,671
Drives: '08 Evo X | '10 370Z
Rep Power: 20 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() It's actually the slowing of the flame front that brings the reduced chance of detonation with a richer mixture. That extra atomized fuel doesn't really do much to decrease the detonation threshold by reducing combustion chamber temperature. It's basically like a drop in a bucket.
__________________
![]() '10 PW 370Z 7AT - wife's car - Project Raspberry Cheesecake '08 Evo X - built motor+trans | BB-X @ 32 psi | CH3OH | self-built+tuned - ??? WHP '01 Galant V6 - built motor | GT35R | self-built+tuned - 550+ WHP (retired) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 257
Drives: 06 Mustang GT
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
I appreciate the technical explanations, but I'm also curious about the design decision itself. To wit, as I said, my '85 300z did NOT require premium fuel. As well, my 2006 Mustang GT does NOT require premium fuel.
So obviously it's not absolutely necessary for a premium sports car to use premium fuel. So why did the Z's designers decide to go this route? Is it just for the extra cachet of having to put the "best" fuel in your sexy sports car? Or is it simply a case that in order to get the amount of horsepower out of an engine the size of of the Z's engine, they *have* to use premium fuel? (kind of like how Nissan recommends that you use ester oil) My thinking here is that if you're going to create an "economy" sports car (relatively), it would seem like a wiser decision to design it so it can run on regular fuel, especially for a relatively low-mileage car like the Z. This will be even more of an issue as the US economy recovers and gas prices, once again, go up, up, up.
__________________
Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: SWMO
Posts: 4,454
Drives: 2019 CX5 GT Reserve
Rep Power: 7628 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Every 1/2 point in compression you go up, is about 15whp. Running 91* instead of 87* will allow for roughly .75-1 point increase in compression or so, given similar tune, and considering the use of aluminum heads. So...would you like the extra 20-30hp, or do you want to cheap out and not have it? I don't get why people whine about the price of fuel on a vehicle that serves no purpose but to have fun. If it were about "need", you would have an Altima or Maxima. It's not. It's about want. So pony up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Track Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Smog Hell, SoCal
Posts: 595
Drives: 40th
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
Quote:
You've got a V6 in a sports car, raise the compression = higher hp/tq numbers, possibly better sales.
__________________
![]() 40th Anniversary Z - 3M Paint Protection Film, CA Legal Tint! (70/40) |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 370z requires premium fuel? | zfast1 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 46 | 04-03-2012 11:03 AM |
| require some respray wisdom | gumpy | Exterior & Interior | 1 | 04-16-2010 11:59 AM |
| I require your Aussie feedback, advice & experience please | Majestik | Australia/New Zealand | 65 | 04-10-2010 04:54 AM |
| I require your feedback, advice & experience please | Majestik | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 13 | 03-31-2010 11:13 AM |
| New Z owner in the area. Require assistance | Supragtsxr | Mid-Atlantic Region | 13 | 10-10-2009 03:06 PM |