![]() |
Originally Posted by cab83_750 aah, 2010 vs 1988 = 20+ years. Is this even fair? I mentioned my stock 1988 Turbo Targa as a previous poster compared his track-tuned '88
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 34
Drives: 370Z NISMO #354
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
![]()
I mentioned my stock 1988 Turbo Targa as a previous poster compared his track-tuned '88 930 to a 370Z.
In addition, several posters from earlier threads expressed interest in purchasing 911s from the 1986-89 period, hence my comparison. And, yes, prices for '86-'89 911 Turbos are ridiculous IMHO for the quality of the driving experience-nevermind the absurd costs of repair/maintenance. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | |
Base Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Danville, CA
Posts: 86
Drives: '10 370Z MB M6
Rep Power: 235 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
Rob Montgomery '10 370Z Sport 6MT - Pretty much stock... '88 Porsche 911 Turbo - You name it... its got it www.bloodsweatandbrokengears.com |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 34
Drives: 370Z NISMO #354
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
I do not call the vile-handling litft-throttle oversteer "intoxicating" or "the driving experience second-to-none"". And, as previously mentioned in earlier posts, I have almost 50 years experience in the hobby during which I held both NHRA (National Competition/Super Street) and SCCA (National Competition) licenses-both of which required multiple Driving/Racing School courses and demonstrated track/strip capability. I was a member of several Race Clubs and served as Instructor for PCA and BMWCCA sponsored driving events in years past. I also submitted articles to both Porsche Panorama and BMW Roundel magazines comparing competitor vehicles to the Porsches and BMWs of the day. Now, I agree to master the '86-'89 911 Turbos requires a modicum of skill, competence and-sometimes-nerve. It can be a great challenge and provide some exhiliration when driven properly. However, even when so driven, they were inferior in performance to the '91 and later Turbos. I do not, however, believe it reasonable to refer to this as a "quality driving experience". Some Porsche purists even referred to the lift-throttle oversteer as the car's "soul and character", decrying the NSX when introduced as "too easy to drive fast" and "souless". Gee, I guess the absurdly-long turbo lag just added to the car's "character"! Utter rubbish, of course. And, if you consider these 911 Turbos as not suitable as a DD and, therefore, only for track use, what does that say about the "driving experience"? Both my 1991 and 1994 Turbos offered far better steering, handling and power delivery and were much faster (stock for stock) on both the strip and track. While they did not offer the same challenges as the earlier Turbos, they did provide an overall better driving experience for both novice and expert. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TT, SC, or just get an R8 or Porsche GT3? | spearfish25 | Forced Induction | 175 | 07-19-2010 04:34 PM |
Porsche GT2 RS | 370Zsteve | Other Vehicles | 13 | 05-14-2010 10:57 AM |
350 owns my 370 | Santent | Engine & Drivetrain | 38 | 09-08-2009 10:59 PM |
Honda S2000 vs BMW 135i vs Nissan 370Z vs Porsche Cayman S vs Porsche 911 | JvKintheUSA | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 2 | 08-04-2009 01:48 PM |
Who owns Porsches and a 370Z? | cab83_750 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 8 | 04-29-2009 10:21 AM |