07-15-2010, 02:28 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 421
Drives: '09 370z Base Red AT
Rep Power: 17
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zaggeron
That maybe right, but the reverse is true as well -- the contract is not proof he owes the money. The OP has the car, title (finance company has that actually), registered in his name, etc. I think the burden of proof would be for the dealership to show he owes the money.
|
The contract is not proof he owes the money sure. But the contract is promise that the customer will pay - so the customer is liable, and in this thread's case, with no proof he paid.
PS: I recorded my entire deal on the cellphone as backup. p h a c k stealerships.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
