07-15-2010, 01:41 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: .
Posts: 42,608
Drives: .
Rep Power: 3888
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spinhead
Even if that were the case, I think it still leaves the burden on the dealership to prove that he did not pay. Their own fault for letting him leave without paying. Just like with a disputed credit card charge, the burden is on the retailer to show signature proof that the purchase was made (or some kind of proof, like delivery confirmation to the person in question).
|
But that's the difference with a cash transaction. The burden is on the consumer to hold on to their receipt as proof of purchase.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
