![]() |
Originally Posted by Cranberry I don't know what it is your debating with me here lol? I compared them to being decent enough to be considered by Porsche as the
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SoCal
Age: 34
Posts: 383
Drives: Infiniti FX35
Rep Power: 37 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
My original point was about how the nismo suspension can handle tires with higher traction limits. Such as an extreme or competition tires. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,229
Drives: 4drz
Rep Power: 36573 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That's debatable. Other than opinion, I haven't seen much data that supports the Nismo as a better handler/posts better track times. They're about equal for the most part. Yes the Nismo is firmer sprung, but that doesn't equate to better handling. Suspension aside, the Nismo does have additional chassis bracing which will help the car feel more solid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SoCal
Age: 34
Posts: 383
Drives: Infiniti FX35
Rep Power: 37 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I'm not sure you read what i said correctly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,229
Drives: 4drz
Rep Power: 36573 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I did. Explain how "it handle tires with higher traction limits". What exactly is so different about the suspension that enables this?
And for what it's worth, there's actually an Edmunds comparison that's been around forever showing the '09 Nismo posting worse times than an '09 Sport. Nismo is wears larger, better tires stock and we all know the RE050 on the sports are terrible. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SoCal
Age: 34
Posts: 383
Drives: Infiniti FX35
Rep Power: 37 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
As for the comparison, nothing about the Nismo's tire package is better than the sport. They both use a 245 front, and this size actually suites the 9 inch wheel on the sport better, a 9.5 should have a 255 at minimum. The rear nismo is only a size bigger at 285 vs 275. Not a big difference at all. It's also proven the Bridgestone is better than the Yokahama, thus the reason almost every car company has ditched the advan for the Bridgestone Re050A or S001. The skidpad tests alone indicated the Yokahama's are nothing to brag about. The advan sport was replaced 3 times over since 2008. Where as the Re050A was only updated once. So for however terrible they are, the advan is worse, giving the Nismo very little performance advantage, if any. The current Nismo uses the S001, which is still categorically not the best in-class, but much improved compared to the old, worst in-class advan sport. For a standard summer tire setup, i'd agree the stock sport suspension will work the tires better. But the stiffer nismo suspension will yield a more stable balance with larger high grip tires. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||||||
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,229
Drives: 4drz
Rep Power: 36573 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by b15; 09-20-2017 at 05:46 PM. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | ||
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: SoCal
Age: 34
Posts: 383
Drives: Infiniti FX35
Rep Power: 37 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Did you measure them? Considering most of the recent M cars are heavier than the Z, the spring rates are unquestionably greater. So clearly you have no accurate bases here. You glossed over this > Quote:
I'm not trying to get into this debate as this is not a discussion on suspension setups. I've made these debates already in the suspension and track setup sections. My position is already argued on this matter, your lack of understanding on these dynamics should be shifted to those threads. Anyone here that has used different tires will tell you, one tire may feel better or handle better with a certain suspension setup and not on something stiffer or softer. Firmer works better with high corner loads, softer feels better with low loads. This is not a guide on vehicle dynamics. If you want further explanations on this, PM me or go read a book on vehicle dynamics. I have several suggestions. If you don't like reading, modify your car accordingly and go test it out for yourself at your local track or Canyon like i have and many others here. AND lastly if you've already done either-or, then i don't know why i even have to explain this any further. ![]() You are having a debate about "comfort" when my point was about actual handling physics. They are not mutual. If you want to go faster, you need greater stability. You get this from firmer chassis control and better tires. This is what the Nismo offers out of the box compared to the sport/touring package, apart from the tires. Thus my suggestion of only needing to upgrade tires. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: ny'r livn in tx
Posts: 8,687
Drives: well over 130m.p.h.
Rep Power: 14859 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() The body bracing allows it to endure more track time than the sport, it is more protected from body flex and has better Aero. It has 18HP to compensate for the 88lb deficit. Other than a little bit of extra help in the endurance dept. And some dampers. They're the same car. They sell a nismo body brace kit for for the sport. I think it's $1,800. Don't quote me on price. I'm sure that'll make them equal. The Z sport has big enough wheels for track duty, the nismo is a Lil extra for the cars size. PS4's are probably too much for the capability of either car. Those are designed for these 500+HP cars. Jus sayin.
__________________
Favorite Quote. "I'm not gonna kill you... I'm just gonna Bash Your Face In" Jack Nicholson-"The Shining". 1980 Last edited by UNKNOWN_370; 09-20-2017 at 05:25 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 89
Drives: 2009 370Z Touring
Rep Power: 703 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
2009 370z M/T - straight pipe cut outs / motordyne test pipes & intake manifold / K&N typhoon intake / ACT stage 2 race clutch & flywheel / ZEX wet nitrous / UpRev tune / stillen race oil cooler / 317 WHP N/A - 381 WHP with ZEX www.youtube.com/danialk ///\\\///\\\ Follow me on Instagram @dankobra |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How much different with sport and nismo suspension | CATCHINZZZS | Brakes & Suspension | 43 | 12-11-2021 03:04 PM |
| [FOR SALE] NISMO Car cover, NISMO Exhaust, PW Sport Spoiler | boosted3z | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 45 | 11-10-2015 02:45 PM |
| (1) 19X9.5 front NISMO Rays + (2) 19X10.5 NISMO Rays w/Yokohoma ADVAN Sport | Nismo-Z | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 18 | 07-21-2011 06:02 PM |
| base Sport VS Nismo? | unisonsports | Tuning | 17 | 07-30-2010 03:35 PM |
| Base (w/Nismo Parts - Non Nismo Z) vs Sport Package | kraphy | Engine & Drivetrain | 10 | 09-24-2009 12:15 PM |