![]() |
Originally Posted by joentown Would there even be a need for a discussion or comparo if the Z had 400+ HP? Let's face it, more HP is what most of
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Z-land
Posts: 1,009
Drives: 2012 370z sport 6-sp
Rep Power: 55342 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Ignorant people also forget weight and weight distribution from front/rear kills horsepower. Great example is the alfa romero 4c 2200lb car 237bhp does 0-60 is low 4seconds and top speed of over 160mph.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1982 Camaro vs Mustang. Throwback review | UNKNOWN_370 | Other Vehicles | 11 | 03-31-2015 09:09 PM |
Ams inc. Corporate video debut! | Wolf@AMS | AMS Motorsports | 4 | 11-20-2012 11:23 AM |
Ams inc. Corporate video debut! | Wolf@AMS | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 15 | 10-28-2012 08:04 AM |
2011 Mustang V6 quick review w/ dyno numbers. | vash_241987 | Other Vehicles | 36 | 04-21-2010 08:33 AM |