![]() |
Originally Posted by MacCool Yes, although if it's a full-auto weapon it would have had to be registered prior to May of 1986. You'd have to be a class 3
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | ||
|
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Minot ND
Posts: 51,960
Drives: every day...
Rep Power: 214 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
![]() 黒子 ('Kuroko') Project: SuperNova Owner/Operator and Lead designer @BlackGuard Aeroworks |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,349
Drives: 370Z PW 2014
Rep Power: 18 ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
The M16/AR15 platform is highly modular and lends itself well to that kind of construction. Although some special tools are necessary, it's a pretty straightforward assembly and well within the capability of anyone with even modest tool-using skills. The hard part is knowing what parts are good, and work well with each other. Earlier in this thread, I made reference to so-called "tier 3" weapons like Bushmaster and DPMS based on their manufacturing specs and QA process, or lack thereof. Those are the kind of parts and brand of parts that most serious rifle "makers" avoid, based on a known history of what works and what fails on these weapons when they're put into hard use. Last edited by MacCool; 05-12-2011 at 08:08 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|