|
There is not much of a noticeable performance difference between the two. Some might say they lose some lowend torque with the testpipes. Test pipes will be cheaper, but comes
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-13-2009, 09:15 AM
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,213
Drives: 2009 370Z PW 6MT
Rep Power: 269   |
There is not much of a noticeable performance difference between the two. Some might say they lose some lowend torque with the testpipes. Test pipes will be cheaper, but comes at the price of sound (rasp/loudness), smell, stains on the rear bumper. HFC's will have just about as much gains, while not being as loud or having the rear bumper stains. However they will cost more. And it seems that with some cars, the cores in the HFC's will deteriorate and need replacement.
__________________
Ray 2009 370Z Base Sport 6MT / 12.860 @ 109.09mph / 1.921 60ft / street tires official 1/4 mile track times |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ebay Test pipes | Anthny2040 | Intake/Exhaust | 8 | 10-27-2009 08:45 PM |
| test pipes or HFC | corbin09 | Wanted | 1 | 07-13-2009 01:15 PM |
| GTM 3" catback with test pipes | huff442 | Intake/Exhaust | 8 | 06-06-2009 01:50 PM |
| Resonated Test Pipes Vs HFC | Solus | Intake/Exhaust | 15 | 06-04-2009 04:05 PM |
| GT Motorsports: VQ37VHR Test Pipes | George@GTM | Intake/Exhaust | 29 | 05-06-2009 07:21 PM |
Threaded Mode
