![]() |
Originally Posted by Alkatraz Are you serious??? I find it hard to believe that in the US there are zero laws which govern trade practises. In Aus we have the
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,449
Drives: A Garbage Truck
Rep Power: 22 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
There is a reason that act is vague. It is vague so the person writing the contract can put the details in. Like I said before if the terms are not defined in the contract the customer still wins. Case would still be dealt with in civil court. It will not be "u.s. vs GTM" if it is "u.s. vs GTM" then you know the government cares. This stuff really is too small for them to care about it. In the end it still goes back to what I have been saying. 51% in civil court wins. Ambiguity in a contract favors the customer. A real good contract will define all terms to its exact detail. I have yet to see the actual contract so I will still say that the people still deserve a refund. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk 4 |
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GTM Performance Engineering 370Z SUPERCHARGER KIT PRESS RELEASE | SAM@GTM | Forced Induction | 1161 | 02-16-2014 08:21 PM |
GTM Performance Engineering: Mild 7 A/T Twin Turbo Build | SAM@GTM | Forced Induction | 37 | 12-11-2013 12:23 PM |
GTM Performance Engineering: 370Z MHI Twin Turbo Pre-Release | SAM@GTM | Forced Induction | 120 | 09-06-2013 06:21 PM |
GTM Performance Engineering stage 2 600hp supercharger kits line-up press release | SAM@GTM | Forced Induction | 305 | 09-27-2012 03:23 PM |