![]() |
Originally Posted by Mike@GTM To be honest, when measuring something as critical as AFR, I would strongly urge you to consider something with known good accuracy. A standalone wideband setup
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,757
Drives: 2010 Touring Sport Z
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I only run 93 octane . I shall see what happens tommorrow. I figured the app pulls the data straight from ecu pids so it is showing me what ecu sees. I hate having gauges in the car but I will look into what options I have for standalone widebands. Thanks Mike! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Not an active Vendor. DO NOT BUY
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California
Posts: 391
Drives: '13 Hot Lava FR-S
Rep Power: 18 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Yeah, ok, that makes sense...I know Sam is pretty conservative on his tunes, but 10.4 seemed a bit much...even when reading off the factory widebands. Tomorrow when you go see your tuner, try to get a dyno graph with AFR readout. Then, compare those numbers to the numbers you're getting from your logger to get an idea of the offset between your data and the dyno's wideband...at least until you get a standalone AFR gauge...if you're concerned about it. Also, since you are running 93 octane, you can actually run a little leaner than you would on 91. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,757
Drives: 2010 Touring Sport Z
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|