![]() |
Even though he might have a higher hp car but that don't mean a whole lot.
|
Quote:
|
maybe the g35s stg 2 cant deliver the power linear and smoothly. there are factors we dont know as well mph of race, what gear, hot out?(sucks for turbos) . things like that but for the most part I would think and I have no experience with TT g's that a stg 2 g35s needs some finesse to deliver 415whp as opposed to an m3 with lets say 380whp? with launch control as well as a dct system that delivers lightning fast shifts
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
What I like about where I'm at now is that the power band is very smooth and not peaky. It looks like an n/a power band! It also retains the N/A low end response, so the TT simply assists the engine for more thrust :)
|
i honestly do not know why i'm not faster then a E92 M3, i thought i would have it pretty easily.
Chris, i have a stg 2 SC not TT, just encase you thought i had a TT. also my car has the 35HR which pretty much shares a lot more parts with the 37VHR then the 35DE, so getting past 400whp limit is quite easy for the HR, unlike the DE |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Here is how this works. Go Twin Turbo Nuff said
|
E92 m3s are a joke. My friend has one and on 6psi (456whp) andi leave him like he is standing still. BTW someone plz beat my 127mph trap speed = )
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Sad thing is I got a ride in a tuned/intake M3 a couple nights ago and it felt as fast as my car with the SC.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2