Supercharge or Turbocharge?

Zamir370z · 10-05-2011, 06:23 AM

Guys if you were given a choice, which one would you go for SuperCharge or Turbocharge?

2011 Nismo#91 · 10-05-2011, 07:37 AM

Turbo, purely on personal preference basis.

My understanding is the an SC is better gains over the entire power band and has in the past been favored for larger displacement engines like those on vettes stangs etc. Turbos give better peak power and can give some ridiculous gains. Typically seen on smaller displacement engines. Theres some reason for that but I can't recall I'm sure someone has some better info then me.

bvl · 10-05-2011, 08:02 AM

There is no clear answer. SC's are often used on larger engines for packaging reasons as well: on a V8, slap low PSI blower on top, and if you are running < 7 psi no intercooling, or A/W in some of todays cars. Parasitic loss is not felt as much to drive the blower.

Turbo being exhaust driven, has less negatives on a smaller engine (the already soft down low is no softer), and you manage power output through proper engineering (A/R sizing for the power band you want, proper intercooling and engine management).

For V engines, you are typically looking at two smaller snails with compressor piping then joining at and A/A IC, then the intake manifold: doable, but far more complicated then a top mount SC typically.

If you were designing a 10 PSI system, either can work well from an output perspective when sized correctly.

- b

TongMan · 10-05-2011, 08:55 AM

Make a poll. I say turbo because you get the bov sound.

2011 Nismo#91 · 10-05-2011, 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TongMan

Make a poll. I say turbo because you get the bov sound.

Yeah that's my reason for wanting a turbo over a SC, yes childish but I don't care.

jaedub · 10-05-2011, 09:37 AM

Make sure your turbo is a bit bigger than this

wdkwang · 10-05-2011, 09:44 AM

turbo is king. period.

elmz · 10-05-2011, 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaedub

Make sure your turbo is a bit bigger than this

That's nothing, I have ones as biggest volkswagons outside my office. I wish I could take a picture of the turbines we make(against policy), they power oil drilling platforms in the middle of the ocean.

Blue370tt · 10-05-2011, 11:14 AM

Depends on what you want....SC's for the 370z are just now starting to make the numbers the TT kits have been putting up for several years. For now, the TT's are faster.....but that could change as GTM and others further develope the SC kits beyond stage 2.

Mike Z · 10-05-2011, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TongMan

Make a poll. I say turbo because you get the bov sound.

bov sound = sex

Jamaica · 10-05-2011, 01:31 PM

SC has the BOV sound....GTM STAGE 2

11Thumper · 10-05-2011, 01:43 PM

I've modded cars in the past with each. Personally, I thought the supercharger gave the most OEM feeling bump in HP. The turbo was a bit more fun at the peak of course, but required more tuning and wasn't as plug and pray.

For the Z if I were to choose, I think supercharger.

kenchan · 10-05-2011, 01:54 PM

ive owned and played with turbo and sc cars in the past. i like the sound of turbo's better and ease of tuning. not a fan of the whine of superchargers but this is just personal taste.

my2004Z · 10-05-2011, 01:55 PM

Supercharger for me. They seem safer on the engine.

exedy699 · 10-05-2011, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenchan

ive owned and played with turbo and sc cars in the past. i like the sound of turbo's better and ease of tuning. not a fan of the whine of superchargers but this is just personal taste.

+1

I found myself hating the new shelby gt500 bc of the loud whine it makes. Don't get me wrong, the car itself looks gorgeous.

10-05-2011, 06:23 AM	#1 (permalink)
Zamir370z Base Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Brunei Posts: 24 Drives: Nissan 370Z 2009 (A) Rep Power: 14	Supercharge or Turbocharge? Guys if you were given a choice, which one would you go for SuperCharge or Turbocharge?

10-05-2011, 09:44 AM	#7 (permalink)
wdkwang Track Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: N/A Posts: 899 Drives: slidewayz Rep Power: 21	turbo is king. period. __________________ Powerhouse Amuse \| K&N Typhoon Intakes \| MotorDyne ART Pipes \| Borla Catback Exhaust \| B&M Short Shifter \| Intake Ducts \| Ichiba 25mm F/R Spacers \| Carbon Fiber Interior Vinyl Wrap \| Tints \| 10000k HIDs \| Vtak, yo!

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
to supercharge or not to supercharge, that is the question....	Fleece82	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	14	11-14-2010 07:37 PM
To Supercharge or NOT to Supercharge...	Red370	Other Vehicles	12	10-28-2010 07:33 AM

10-05-2011, 07:37 AM	#2 (permalink)
2011 Nismo#91 A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: NJ Posts: 2,412 Drives: slowly Rep Power: 40570	Turbo, purely on personal preference basis. My understanding is the an SC is better gains over the entire power band and has in the past been favored for larger displacement engines like those on vettes stangs etc. Turbos give better peak power and can give some ridiculous gains. Typically seen on smaller displacement engines. Theres some reason for that but I can't recall I'm sure someone has some better info then me.

10-05-2011, 08:02 AM	#3 (permalink)
bvl Enthusiast Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: PA Posts: 362 Drives: MB Roadster (sold) Rep Power: 15	There is no clear answer. SC's are often used on larger engines for packaging reasons as well: on a V8, slap low PSI blower on top, and if you are running < 7 psi no intercooling, or A/W in some of todays cars. Parasitic loss is not felt as much to drive the blower. Turbo being exhaust driven, has less negatives on a smaller engine (the already soft down low is no softer), and you manage power output through proper engineering (A/R sizing for the power band you want, proper intercooling and engine management). For V engines, you are typically looking at two smaller snails with compressor piping then joining at and A/A IC, then the intake manifold: doable, but far more complicated then a top mount SC typically. If you were designing a 10 PSI system, either can work well from an output perspective when sized correctly. - b

10-05-2011, 08:55 AM	#4 (permalink)
TongMan A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: NorCal Posts: 1,297 Drives: 2013 Nissan GTR Rep Power: 716	Make a poll. I say turbo because you get the bov sound.

10-05-2011, 11:14 AM	#9 (permalink)
Blue370tt Enthusiast Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Chattanooga TN Posts: 279 Drives: Nissan Juke Rep Power: 15	Depends on what you want....SC's for the 370z are just now starting to make the numbers the TT kits have been putting up for several years. For now, the TT's are faster.....but that could change as GTM and others further develope the SC kits beyond stage 2.

10-05-2011, 01:31 PM	#11 (permalink)
Jamaica A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: SoCal Posts: 15,362 Drives: Under boost Rep Power: 74	SC has the BOV sound....GTM STAGE 2

10-05-2011, 01:43 PM	#12 (permalink)
11Thumper Track Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Bay Area, CA Posts: 754 Drives: '11 370Z, '01 S2k Rep Power: 18	I've modded cars in the past with each. Personally, I thought the supercharger gave the most OEM feeling bump in HP. The turbo was a bit more fun at the peak of course, but required more tuning and wasn't as plug and pray. For the Z if I were to choose, I think supercharger.

10-05-2011, 01:54 PM	#13 (permalink)
kenchan A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: N/A Posts: 76,801 Drives: N/A Rep Power: 141521	ive owned and played with turbo and sc cars in the past. i like the sound of turbo's better and ease of tuning. not a fan of the whine of superchargers but this is just personal taste.

10-05-2011, 01:55 PM	#14 (permalink)
my2004Z Enthusiast Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: New Mexico, USA Posts: 285 Drives: 09' 370Z w/Sport 7AT Rep Power: 38	Supercharger for me. They seem safer on the engine.