![]() |
There is no clear answer. SC's are often used on larger engines for packaging reasons as well: on a V8, slap low PSI blower on top, and if you are
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Enthusiast Member
![]() Join Date: May 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 362
Drives: MB Roadster (sold)
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
There is no clear answer. SC's are often used on larger engines for packaging reasons as well: on a V8, slap low PSI blower on top, and if you are running < 7 psi no intercooling, or A/W in some of todays cars. Parasitic loss is not felt as much to drive the blower.
Turbo being exhaust driven, has less negatives on a smaller engine (the already soft down low is no softer), and you manage power output through proper engineering (A/R sizing for the power band you want, proper intercooling and engine management). For V engines, you are typically looking at two smaller snails with compressor piping then joining at and A/A IC, then the intake manifold: doable, but far more complicated then a top mount SC typically. If you were designing a 10 PSI system, either can work well from an output perspective when sized correctly. - b |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| to supercharge or not to supercharge, that is the question.... | Fleece82 | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 14 | 11-14-2010 07:37 PM |
| To Supercharge or NOT to Supercharge... | Red370 | Other Vehicles | 12 | 10-28-2010 07:33 AM |