![]() |
Originally Posted by Reality OP, Diffferent Dyno #'s should be taken with a grain of salt. I wouldn't get to hung up on a 15whp difference. That could all be
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Track Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Los Angles
Posts: 668
Drives: G37
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
Quote:
Of course the owner of the DYNO could make adjustments to his DYNOPACK to account for the higher HP. Not sure I don't own one just stating what I know from Experience and what logic tells me (power is lost at wheels) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 290
Drives: '06 PPW GT
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
-Church's automotive, balloon dyno is legendary... and shouldn't be included in this convo. All load based dyno's can be altered to show fictitious gains, by adding correction factors etc.. which is why most consider the Dynojet to be the defacto standard. Regardless, dyno #'s should only be used to show increases from baseline. Trap speeds will tell you what you are really putting down.
__________________
//2005 35th SB #81 [tyra] SOLD //2006 GT PPW SOLD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Track Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Los Angles
Posts: 668
Drives: G37
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
Quote:
I get about 350 WHP on a Dynopack and about 320ish on dynojet |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GTM Stage 2 Supercharger Preliminary Testing Results | SAM@GTM | Forced Induction | 576 | 01-15-2014 09:40 PM |
| GTM Supercharger Stage 1 w/ F.I. LTH | theDreamer | Forced Induction | 140 | 03-16-2013 04:50 PM |
| Are test pipes ok with GTM supercharger stage 1? | JordoKAP | Forced Induction | 15 | 06-29-2011 02:38 PM |
| GTM supercharger stage 1 videos | Fezzik | Forced Induction | 23 | 05-10-2011 11:34 AM |