Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Forced Induction (http://www.the370z.com/forced-induction/)
-   -   First top mount single turbo 370Z (http://www.the370z.com/forced-induction/35793-first-top-mount-single-turbo-370z.html)

98intrigue 05-14-2011 03:37 PM

I forgot to mention, I took the car out for an hour drive last night... my first time really getting to boost the car...boosted quite a bit...put a smile on my face quite a bit :)

Isamu 05-14-2011 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 98intrigue (Post 1110711)
I forgot to mention, I took the car out for an hour drive last night... my first time really getting to boost the car...boosted quite a bit...put a smile on my face quite a bit :)

tell me more? :yum:

Isamu 05-14-2011 03:52 PM

oh, and btw, AMAZING numbers on such low boost! <3

98intrigue 05-14-2011 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Isamu (Post 1110734)
tell me more? :yum:

Well, I removed the plastic undertray and fender liners to see if that would aid the oil cooler into getting rid of the hot air stuffed in the engine bay. After doing 3 back to back pulls, oils temps only hit 240. I went and gave a friend a ride and he said it felt faster than my G35 (it trapped 116mph). I went home with a smile on my face.:icon17:

SPOHN 05-14-2011 04:11 PM

What size is your cooler?

Nismo370 05-14-2011 04:13 PM

Only 240? Dude that's really high. Even when I had my 25row it never got anywhere near that, how hot was it ou where you are when you did those pulls? You should switch to a 34row and what a difference did it make for me.

98intrigue 05-14-2011 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPOHN (Post 1110785)
What size is your cooler?

Setrab 25-row.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nismo370 (Post 1110790)
Only 240? Dude that's really high. Even when I had my 25row it never got anywhere near that, how hot was it ou where you are when you did those pulls? You should switch to a 34row and what a difference did it make for me.

I say only 240 (it was 75 last night) becasue I've seen 250 (92 during the day) not boosting at all on a 7 minute drive. I'm honestly not sure if a 34-row will fit. Shawn is going to relocate the oil cooler. That SHOULD fix the problem. If not, I'll see if I can fit a 34-row somewhere in there.

Nismo370 05-14-2011 04:34 PM

I have a 34 row with my big intercooler, it should fit for you. But yeah your engine shouldn't be running that hot, you can damage the head like that. Did you guys mess with your coolant system?

Nismo370 05-14-2011 04:35 PM

240 is high man, should be no more than 220 at most.

Red__Zed 05-14-2011 04:42 PM

240+ is fine with good oil.

Nismo370 05-14-2011 04:47 PM

You guys are nuts if you think 240 is fine.

Nitrouz 05-14-2011 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 98intrigue (Post 1110711)
I forgot to mention, I took the car out for an hour drive last night... my first time really getting to boost the car...boosted quite a bit...put a smile on my face quite a bit :)

What are your thoughts on turbo'ing the VQ37 compared to the VQ35? Not the power/speed differences, but the power delivery? Drivability? response?

Red__Zed 05-14-2011 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nismo370 (Post 1110907)
You guys are nuts if you think 240 is fine.

You ever look at optimal ranges for most modern oils?

jnaut 05-14-2011 05:45 PM

ryan, i do feel being that the fans are in front possibly the shroud is hurting more than helping you. I would think about putting on just regular round fans without the shroud. Sorry if i miss read but are your new mafs in and have they been tune with them? sorry bro 240 is no good :)

As an overall i glad to see different builds... i will be back into my single turbo by the end of the year. Congrats again, but be prepared as Billy want me to take his tt car to the track. Ima own 1/4 times for n/a and tt hahahaha


yea so i just looked at the pics and no shroud...disregard my idea above... i have been working too much

SPOHN 05-14-2011 06:09 PM

Go with a 34R cooler. Especially where you live. Couldn't hurt.

Nismo370 05-14-2011 06:13 PM

Thank you 240 is not good. 34row where u live ist a must.

Red__Zed 05-14-2011 09:27 PM

Our heads run at about 250F under normal circumstances. You won't be damaging them by running 240* oil temps.

Nismo370 05-14-2011 11:29 PM

I was refering the head issue getting damaged because he said the motor temp was one dot away from the max to the far right. Engine over heating will destroy those heads.

JordoKAP 05-15-2011 12:20 PM

Those are really good results, full boost by 3-4krpm! 430whp!

A4RingedONE8T 05-16-2011 09:08 PM

Got Ryan's car back in today, moved the oil cooler to the front and made a shroud to direct air into it through the rather small grill openings in the bumper. Pulled the turbo and wrapped the blanket tighter, completely consealing the exhaust housing. Also removed the lower coolant house and heat wrapped it, and reinstalled. Made an aluminum coolant overflow/expansion tank as well to help keep the system full and air free! Few little things to go over in the morning and she will be going back to the dyno with new upgraded MAF's, a retune, and more boost!


http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1.../IMG_6406R.jpg

http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1.../IMG_6401R.jpg

http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1.../IMG_6403R.jpg

Red__Zed 05-16-2011 09:10 PM

looks gorgeous.

b1adesofcha0s 05-16-2011 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 1115342)
looks gorgeous.

:iagree:

HKYStormFront 05-16-2011 09:37 PM

looking good!

Kastley85891 05-17-2011 06:29 AM

Nice rev2 dude, liking that cooler placement - watching for results

SPOHN 05-17-2011 07:17 AM

Great updates. What a great project and learning experience also.

Isamu 05-17-2011 07:33 AM

I didn't realize you had the MD Intake mani!! sexy!

CZero 05-17-2011 10:10 PM

Really cool.

NismoZ370 05-18-2011 12:32 PM

This build is amazing and im happy to see a Z pull it off so clean and well done! Tuned in for final results :) Again Very Very nice work!!!

JollyGoodChap 05-18-2011 01:40 PM

maybe black ceramic coat the piping for a stealthy look and heat protection? It would hide those beautiful welds though.

JordoKAP 05-18-2011 01:46 PM

Very impressive.

What MAF sensors are you guys going to upgrade to?

370ZDreamer 05-18-2011 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChipsWithDips (Post 1109232)
Yeah like I said, that MAF on the passenger side bend is not gonna be able to get an accurate reading. Think about it, the flow of air through a bend is not equal across the entire cross section of pipe. There's going to be a gradient of different flows throughout. The MAF only measures flow across it's hot filament which is only a specific point in that cross section. There's no way for it to get an accurate average of the entire cross sectional area.


Here's an example of how flow changes through just 30degrees of bend.
http://i.imgur.com/c5snv.png



if you did that they would be reading 2x as much flow each.

How does Nissan handle the flow from 2 different MAF sensors to begin with? Are there 2 different airflow curves for each MAF?

I am used to tuning Ford and GM cars with a single MAF, but when you change the MAF size or location on either of those applications you just build a new airflow curve for the calibration.

Couldnt you do that with 2 maf's in 1 pipe or is it just one table even though theres 2 MAF's?

ChipsWithDips 05-18-2011 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 370ZDreamer (Post 1118809)
How does Nissan handle the flow from 2 different MAF sensors to begin with? Are there 2 different airflow curves for each MAF?

I am used to tuning Ford and GM cars with a single MAF, but when you change the MAF size or location on either of those applications you just build a new airflow curve for the calibration.

Couldnt you do that with 2 maf's in 1 pipe or is it just one table even though theres 2 MAF's?

The problem is the MAFs would max out their voltage much earlier. Tuning the MAF tables in the ECU just changes how much airflow the ECU interprets the MAF voltage levels as. Doesn't help if you're maxing out the voltage.

Nixlimited 05-18-2011 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 370ZDreamer (Post 1118809)
How does Nissan handle the flow from 2 different MAF sensors to begin with? Are there 2 different airflow curves for each MAF?

I am used to tuning Ford and GM cars with a single MAF, but when you change the MAF size or location on either of those applications you just build a new airflow curve for the calibration.

Couldnt you do that with 2 maf's in 1 pipe or is it just one table even though theres 2 MAF's?

Edit: see post below.

I hate MAFs altogether. Give me MAP metering any day!

As someone else pointed out, 2 MAFs in 1 pipe wouldn't work well because they are sized to handle half the airflow and would max out. Even though you can recalibrate them, it would still be a mess.

jran76 05-18-2011 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nixlimited (Post 1119134)
I assume the injectors in the left bank of cylinders will be pulsed according to the reading of MAF 1 and the injectors in the right bank of cylinders will be pulsed according to the reading of MAF 2. One of the drawbacks of 1 MAF is the assumption that air metered by the MAF is equally distributed to the different cylinders. I assume 2 MAFs helps mitigate this issue; however, as we have seen with this project, that does not hold true when the piping is changed. I hate MAFs altogether. Give me MAP metering any day!

The air from both intakes (and MAF's) all ends up in the same place. They are not divided inside the plenum/manifold, and the runners are in a row down the middle so they are pulling air from both intakes at the same time as it is mixed inside the plenum. The ECU just sees the air flow (voltage) from both MAF's and calculates the two together as the total amount of air going in. If each intake only went to one bank of (3) cylinders, the OP would have to re-do the piping to have somewhat even airflow to each side. Since the air is mixed inside the plenum, they are going to overcome the issue by allowing more airflow on one side than the other, and upgrading the MAF's to handle more airflow/voltage on that one side that has more airflow (really a band-aide for the uneven airflow, but it will work with the way our intake plenum and runners are setup).

Edit: The above is not correct. After looking at some pics and the service manual, it is split inside the manifold, and the ECU is looking at the MAF signals as Bank 1 and Bank 2.

Nixlimited 05-18-2011 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jran76 (Post 1119248)
The air from both intakes (and MAF's) all ends up in the same place. They are not divided inside the plenum/manifold, and the runners are in a row down the middle so they are pulling air from both intakes at the same time as it is mixed inside the plenum. The ECU just sees the air flow (voltage) from both MAF's and calculates the two together as the total amount of air going in. If each intake only went to one bank of (3) cylinders, the OP would have to re-do the piping to have somewhat even airflow to each side. Since the air is mixed inside the plenum, they are going to overcome the issue by allowing more airflow on one side than the other, and upgrading the MAF's to handle more airflow/voltage on that one side that has more airflow (really a band-aide for the uneven airflow, but it will work with the way our intake plenum and runners are setup).

Ahhhh, DUH! Not having experience with the innards of the plenum I assumed there was some other reason for the dual MAFs. Editing my post above to not spread false info.

jran76 05-18-2011 06:11 PM

So, I was wrong. It does look like it is split in some way, and the MAF's are specifically referred to as for "Bank 1" and "Bank 2" in the service manual. I am assuming that there is something to even out the airflow to each side, but not sure what it is.

Here are some good pics of the inside of the manifold. http://www.the370z.com/diy-section-d...take-swap.html

1slow370 05-19-2011 04:00 AM

you could put both sensors in one pipe you just need a larger pipe with twice the flow of a single pipe and tweak in the maps. The reduced velocity from the larger pipe will keep the MAF sensors form maxing. <-- also the piping around the problematic sensor could just be bulged out to do the same thing and keep it from maxing. you don't need new MAF sensors you need a new pipe + tune. Also i'm sure his shop already knows all of this so we could all just shut up and wait for it to be finished?

370ZDreamer 05-19-2011 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jran76 (Post 1119461)
So, I was wrong. It does look like it is split in some way, and the MAF's are specifically referred to as for "Bank 1" and "Bank 2" in the service manual. I am assuming that there is something to even out the airflow to each side, but not sure what it is.

Here are some good pics of the inside of the manifold. http://www.the370z.com/diy-section-d...take-swap.html

So are the MAF's represented in the processor tables as Bank 1 and 2 or just 1 whole airflow table?

370ZDreamer 05-19-2011 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1slow370 (Post 1120294)
you could put both sensors in one pipe you just need a larger pipe with twice the flow of a single pipe and tweak in the maps. The reduced velocity from the larger pipe will keep the MAF sensors form maxing. <-- also the piping around the problematic sensor could just be bulged out to do the same thing and keep it from maxing. you don't need new MAF sensors you need a new pipe + tune. Also i'm sure his shop already knows all of this so we could all just shut up and wait for it to be finished?

Exactly, thats how its done on Ford and GM's, A larger diameter pipe will produce a lower voltage reading but with a higher airflow level, but you can still max out the sensor. It just buys you a little more room. If you do this and you still max out the sensor then you still need a re-calibrated sensor.

98intrigue 05-19-2011 11:07 AM

Well, here's an update for eveyone...

I picked up the car last Thursday. I drove it to work Friday and noticed the oil temps at 250. Saturday, I was running some errands and oil temps were up there again...but this time the coolant temp was 1 dot away from the far right. I also heard the car knocking at around 30mph in 4th gear. It was around noon with temps around 88 degrees. So I dropped the car off again Sunday with Shawn.

He moved the oil cooler to the front of the engine bay and made the air deflector for it. He also made a custom overflow tank because there was air in the system. I picked it up yesterday and drove it straight to S&R to check the tune. We did some street tuning for about an hour or so. Very first LIGHT pull (not even 50% throttle) and there was very noticeable knock. I pull over while the tuner is working on the timing/fuel, so the car sat at idle for about 5 minutes. As soon as there is no airflow to the radiator (aka sitting at idle), the temps shoot up! We were seeing 240 degrees at idle and around 215 degrees when driving. Airflow is key to cooling this damn car!

So we do another 10 minute drive and the tuner adjusts the tune again. I now have 5 of the same fuel maps, but each map differs in timing by nearly 2 degrees. Currently at map 3 (middle aggressive timing), there was no knock. Weird thing is at idle, the AFR will be anywhere from 15.0-12.0. At cruising, same thing...sometimes it's ideal and then a few minutes later at cruising, the AFRs will be in the 12s. My gas mileage is going to SUCK for ZDayz.

So I dropped the car back off with Shawn last night at around 10:30. He said he'd hook up a remote switch so I can turn on the fans whenever, rather than giving the car a headstart to warm up and then the fans kick on. On my way to the shop, it was unusually cool (66 degrees) and the coolant dot never moved from 2 dots to the left of center and oil temps hovered around 200-205. Feeling comfortable with the temps, I did go WOT once and didn't hear any knock. Shawn texted me this morning saying he got his hands on Flex-a-lite fans! Once the cooling issues are taken care of, I'll go with bigger injectors and the upgraded MAFs and a new tune. :driving:

Shawn continues to amaze me with his dedication to making me satisfied with my car. He's going the extra mike to get me on my way to ZDayz...because as of last night, I wasn't going to risk anything and I was going to stay here.

I want to mention that I appreciate everyone's comments/feedback/criticism. This is a learning experience for everyone involved. That's what these forums are for...bouncing ideas off each other and helping the community out. Being that this is a true custom build, I know issues are going go arise... and Shawn has been willing every step of the way to help me out. :tup:


Quote:

Originally Posted by JordoKAP (Post 1118745)
Very impressive.

What MAF sensors are you guys going to upgrade to?

I'm not sure what brand they are. S&R ordered them for me.
Quote:

Originally Posted by jran76 (Post 1119461)
So, I was wrong. It does look like it is split in some way, and the MAF's are specifically referred to as for "Bank 1" and "Bank 2" in the service manual. I am assuming that there is something to even out the airflow to each side, but not sure what it is.

Here are some good pics of the inside of the manifold. http://www.the370z.com/diy-section-d...take-swap.html

Thank you for the reference! With the way the VQ35 motors were, I was under the assumption that the air did disperse from the upper plenum into the lower plenum, then into the runners. It doesn't look to be that way in the VQ37s. The good thing is I was watching the AFRs when we were street tuning and the AFR from each bank is nearly identical. It was off by maybe 0.1 at some points.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1slow370 (Post 1120294)
you could put both sensors in one pipe you just need a larger pipe with twice the flow of a single pipe and tweak in the maps. The reduced velocity from the larger pipe will keep the MAF sensors form maxing. <-- also the piping around the problematic sensor could just be bulged out to do the same thing and keep it from maxing. you don't need new MAF sensors you need a new pipe + tune. Also i'm sure his shop already knows all of this so we could all just shut up and wait for it to be finished?

That was thought about to, but with the way the hood angles down, Shawn could not fit any piping bigger than the 2.5" piping that runs among the front of the motor.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2