Nissan 370Z Forum  

Help Please!

What’s your fuel pressure? Around 52psi is normal idle I believe. Also the fuel strainer/pickup could be really dirty/clogged.

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z Tech Area > Engine & Drivetrain > Forced Induction


Like Tree5Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-2018, 08:23 AM   #16 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
overtureZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Middle TN
Age: 30
Posts: 319
Drives: Da Boosted Z
Rep Power: 9
overtureZ is on a distinguished road
Default

What’s your fuel pressure? Around 52psi is normal idle I believe. Also the fuel strainer/pickup could be really dirty/clogged.
__________________
Auto/Z Enthusiast - Mechanical Engineer - Fabricator - Do it for dale
overtureZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2018, 05:31 PM   #17 (permalink)
Track Member
 
turtle64b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 550
Drives: '11 SC Blue 7AT
Rep Power: 3365
turtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by overtureZ View Post
What’s your fuel pressure? Around 52psi is normal idle I believe. Also the fuel strainer/pickup could be really dirty/clogged.
Fuel pressure is 52 @ idle.

I received my full speed density tune last night and it's a night and day difference! Hopefully that will be good for the long-term.

Thank you all for input!!
MoulaZ likes this.
turtle64b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2018, 07:10 PM   #18 (permalink)
Enthusiast Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Youngstown, FL
Posts: 256
Drives: 2015 PW Nismo 6MT
Rep Power: 8
bcfromfl will become famous soon enoughbcfromfl will become famous soon enough
Default

Why do you think your car ran OK for a few days after the swap, before the problem? Any ideas on the trigger?
bcfromfl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2018, 08:47 PM   #19 (permalink)
Track Member
 
turtle64b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 550
Drives: '11 SC Blue 7AT
Rep Power: 3365
turtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcfromfl View Post
Why do you think your car ran OK for a few days after the swap, before the problem? Any ideas on the trigger?
I honestly have no idea. Other than the vacuum line to the BOV and removing the intercooler, literally no other air-carrying lines were even touched... A theory I have is maybe the MAF signal disparity was initially manageable but the addition of the 9lb pulley caused the imbalance to be too big? Maybe?

Even that I could argue you should see problems immediately following the install...

The other theory is that maybe the orientation of the coupling from the intercooler to the intake Y pipe is directing flow differently after removing and replacing the intercooler.
turtle64b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2018, 02:29 AM   #20 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 237
Drives: 2015 370z
Rep Power: 6724
ByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoulaZ View Post
I'm curious behind his reasoning for the different MAP sensors. I've got both, and he didn't ask me to change over to the other one. Kinda want to try it now, lol.
With the a2a setup the turbulence normally present at the stock stillen MAP sensor location goes away. If choosing to run the stillen manifold unmodified, then tapping in between the two throttle bodies is the way to go to get a clean manifold pressure reading with minimal turbulence.
ByThaBay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2018, 06:35 AM   #21 (permalink)
Base Member
 
MoulaZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 229
Drives: '09 Z34 BP Turbo V2
Rep Power: 24
MoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ByThaBay View Post
With the a2a setup the turbulence normally present at the stock stillen MAP sensor location goes away. If choosing to run the stillen manifold unmodified, then tapping in between the two throttle bodies is the way to go to get a clean manifold pressure reading with minimal turbulence.
Turbulence as reason make sense. What doesn't is how changing from W2A to A2A affects Turbulence. Air still flows past the same TBs in the same manner, albeit more flow overall. I'd be pretty concerned the characteristics changed so much inside the intake manifold to necessitate a change in MAP location.
MoulaZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2018, 12:09 PM   #22 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 237
Drives: 2015 370z
Rep Power: 6724
ByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond reputeByThaBay has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoulaZ View Post
Turbulence as reason make sense. What doesn't is how changing from W2A to A2A affects Turbulence. Air still flows past the same TBs in the same manner, albeit more flow overall. I'd be pretty concerned the characteristics changed so much inside the intake manifold to necessitate a change in MAP location.
I haven’t confirmed it myself but it’s what I recall he told me also. Perhaps someone that has both installed can do a few runs side by side and check the variation in the two different readings.
ByThaBay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2018, 03:02 PM   #23 (permalink)
Track Member
 
turtle64b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 550
Drives: '11 SC Blue 7AT
Rep Power: 3365
turtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond reputeturtle64b has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoulaZ View Post
Turbulence as reason make sense. What doesn't is how changing from W2A to A2A affects Turbulence. Air still flows past the same TBs in the same manner, albeit more flow overall. I'd be pretty concerned the characteristics changed so much inside the intake manifold to necessitate a change in MAP location.
So you have two Mass Air Flow sensors that meter the air coming into the engine as it flows past them. There is also a Manifold Air Pressure sensor on the back driver's side of the intake manifold (stock or Stillen). With the a2w setup, that heat exchanger is in the way of air entering the intake manifold and getting to the engine. This can cause pressure fluctuations (turbulence) where the stock sensor position is. Moving the sensor to before that heat exchanger (n between the TBs) gives you a more accurate reading of manifold pressure.

With the a2a, that intercooler is not in the way and so the air flows through the TBs into a giant cavern (relatively no turbulence) before entering the engine.

Just my thought on the why, but I am not an expert.
turtle64b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2018, 08:44 PM   #24 (permalink)
Base Member
 
MoulaZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 229
Drives: '09 Z34 BP Turbo V2
Rep Power: 24
MoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond reputeMoulaZ has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by turtle64b View Post
So you have two Mass Air Flow sensors that meter the air coming into the engine as it flows past them. There is also a Manifold Air Pressure sensor on the back driver's side of the intake manifold (stock or Stillen). With the a2w setup, that heat exchanger is in the way of air entering the intake manifold and getting to the engine. This can cause pressure fluctuations (turbulence) where the stock sensor position is. Moving the sensor to before that heat exchanger (n between the TBs) gives you a more accurate reading of manifold pressure.

With the a2a, that intercooler is not in the way and so the air flows through the TBs into a giant cavern (relatively no turbulence) before entering the engine.

Just my thought on the why, but I am not an expert.
Ahhh, forgot about that piece of crap Intercooler inside. I had erased that terrible thing from memory, lol. This is a fair point.
turtle64b likes this.
MoulaZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2