Nissan 370Z Forum  

Thoughts on Engine Sound at High RPM's (kinda long)

Originally Posted by RCZ haha, yeah the car is "rough" pass 4500RPM. You're not going crazy. The way it sounds and the way it feels are two totally different things.

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z Tech Area > Engine & Drivetrain


Like Tree2Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-31-2011, 08:37 AM   #1 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: OH
Posts: 81
Drives: 2009 370z
Rep Power: 16
jtsmith1 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCZ View Post
haha, yeah the car is "rough" pass 4500RPM. You're not going crazy. The way it sounds and the way it feels are two totally different things. No one should appreciate an engine that feels like you're breaking it when you take it up in the rev range...which ours does.

I don't think its that we're hitting its frequency, it just feels rough. It does it for several thousand RPM and that should tell us its not just resonance, its just that the damn thing vibrates a lot. Be it from the vvel system or more solid engine mounts or what. I've had three types of flywheel on my car and they all made similar vibration at high rpm. You could say the stock fw feels more muffled because it doesnt seem to get transferred into the cabin and chassis as much, but its still there loud and clear.

I had solid transmission mounts installed a while back and the vibration was completely unbearable. At high RPM it felt like the world was ending. I think the best we're going to be able to do is isolate the vibrations as much as we can, maybe we can get some liquid filled mounts like porsche does... that gt3 feels like silk at 9k rpm.
Right! I know its not resonance, if it was then the engine would literally tear itself apart. But as you approach resonance, vibrations increase until you reach resonance, then slowly decrease as you continue passed the resonance frequency.

I'm wondering if the engine is approaching this range, frequency wise, as its rpms are increasing.

Hydraulic mounts would be awesome, as long as they didn't leak, which all do over time.
jtsmith1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2011, 11:06 AM   #2 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
wstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,024
Drives: too slow
Rep Power: 3596
wstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond reputewstar has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I guess it's subjective whether it sounds/feels like a problem. I'll grant you, to me it sounds like a beast of a machine rampaging out of control, but I guess that's what I expect from that many RPMs in a V6. Doing the math (3.7L V6, 4-cycle), at say 7,000 RPM that engine is exploding a 617cc ball of fuel/air mixture about 350 times per second in a tiny lightweight aluminum machine, and trying to capture rotational mechanical energy from the process. I'm sure some engineering could make it sound/feel sweeter, but c'mon what do you expect?

It never feels to me vibrationally like the engine is tearing itself apart though. It could be that the 7AT's torque convertor damps a lot of the vibration, so that we only get engine-mount vibrations and not transmission-mount vibrations, if everyone who notices this has a 6MT.
__________________
7AT Track Car!
Journal thread / Car setup details
wstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2011, 11:54 AM   #3 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
phelan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: CA
Age: 40
Posts: 9,513
Drives: Scoobaroo
Rep Power: 3408
phelan has a reputation beyond reputephelan has a reputation beyond reputephelan has a reputation beyond reputephelan has a reputation beyond reputephelan has a reputation beyond reputephelan has a reputation beyond reputephelan has a reputation beyond reputephelan has a reputation beyond reputephelan has a reputation beyond reputephelan has a reputation beyond reputephelan has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jtsmith1 View Post
Right! I know its not resonance, if it was then the engine would literally tear itself apart. But as you approach resonance, vibrations increase until you reach resonance, then slowly decrease as you continue passed the resonance frequency.

I'm wondering if the engine is approaching this range, frequency wise, as its rpms are increasing.

Hydraulic mounts would be awesome, as long as they didn't leak, which all do over time.
I think a design parameter for any automotive engineer in building a new engine is to make sure the resonance frequencies are far, far away from any operating condition. The last thing you need is someone taking their car out, high-revving through the gears on the street, then watch the engine hit resonance and displace itself into the road.

Keep in mind that engines (and most mechanical components on mass produced products for that matter) are built with a high margin of safety. For something mass produced like a car, the margin of safety is typically beyond 1.0, to cover remote and extremely remote probabilities. So even at high RPMs, I doubt we are anywhere near the resonance frequency, or achieving any damaging modal shape on the VHR platform.

RCZ nailed it when he said the engine is just rough. Granted some of the mounts could have dampeners on it to soften the vibrational effects, but then you add weight in a car that really doesn't aim itself to be a smooth driver. That's half the fun of the Z; a simple sports car (or as simple as you can get these days....except for the newfangled SRM thingy).

Considering your theory about the flywheel - yes, a heavier one will act as a dampener and reduce the vibration in the transmission. But consider the mass of the flywheel against the amount of force acting on it. To get an appreciable level of reduction will require the flywheel to much more mass than it is worth performance-wise. Do the simulation in MATLAB using a maximum level force input based on the power output of the engine at high-RPM, and you'll see it.
__________________

凛 ('Rin') - 2009 Nissan 370Z
With silence comes peace. With peace comes freedom. With freedom comes silence.

Last edited by phelan; 05-31-2011 at 11:57 AM.
phelan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2011, 03:56 PM   #4 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: OH
Posts: 81
Drives: 2009 370z
Rep Power: 16
jtsmith1 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phelan View Post
RCZ nailed it when he said the engine is just rough.
Thats kind of like saying "Because I said so." Something (or a combination of things) is causing this.

I am not saying that resonance is an issues here, I understand that it is NOT the issue. I simply gave some background info on vibrations to help others understand the idea of how rpms (frequencies) can excite materials and mass systems, to help explain what I feel could be an reason for the sound/feel at high RPM's.

I understand the Safety Factor is not identical to 1 and that there is some "overengineering" to ensure there arent any issues (not like this is a fighter aircraft where weight is super critical). However, this is not beneficial for the company from a cost standpoint, so I imagine using a SF much higher than 1 is not a best practice they use often.

I am actually not very familiar with MATLAB, never really used it much, but I would be interested in seeing something showing how an increase in flywheel mass effects the power output.

Last edited by jtsmith1; 05-31-2011 at 04:03 PM.
jtsmith1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
370z engine will last long? The Rock Nissan 370Z General Discussions 25 03-11-2011 02:59 PM
WTB: High Flow Cats or F.I. Long Tube Headers and Uprev Mozen Wanted 0 02-05-2011 12:59 PM
Long Tube Intake Sound 6spd Intake/Exhaust 19 01-18-2010 08:55 AM
high frequency sound/annoying as hell sound Santent Nissan 370Z General Discussions 4 12-22-2009 09:59 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2