![]() |
Not if you are running -1.3 to -1.5 in the fronts. Ideally you want a 0.3 difference from the fronts to the rear with the fronts having MORE negative camber
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 2,359
Drives: 09 370Z Tour + Sport
Rep Power: 22 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Not if you are running -1.3 to -1.5 in the fronts. Ideally you want a 0.3 difference from the fronts to the rear with the fronts having MORE negative camber than the rears. IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 2,359
Drives: 09 370Z Tour + Sport
Rep Power: 22 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Front Control Arms will open up much more possiblities with adjusting the camber +/-. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 2,359
Drives: 09 370Z Tour + Sport
Rep Power: 22 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
speedworks, the wheel tire combo you selected really fill up the wheel well. Stance looks great.
What is your first driving impression? Were you on stock springs prior to Swift?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Track Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 550
Drives: PW purchased 01/09
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
I haven't driven it yet with the Forgestars, but I did have OEM before the Swifts. My first impressions, are that they are great. You hear on this site that they are better (softer) then OEM on normal driving, but I don't agree with that; I think they are equal or maybe a smidge stiffer then stock. As for aggressive driving, they are definately stiffer, less body roll. I like the overall stance of the vehicle a lot, and the ride is great. Having driven on many different mfgrs of springs over my lifetime (even owned a speed shop for 5 years), I think Swift has a done a great job on developing these springs - especially since they are made for the OEM shocks, which in the long run is more affordable. Even though they cost more out of the box, overall they are cheaper because they don't require new shocks (they should market that!). I think Swift has a home-run here, and you can tell because everyone who is buying just springs is going that way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Mod Capital of Canada
Age: 59
Posts: 7,354
Drives: cars. lots of cars.
Rep Power: 40183 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'll chime in and agree with speedworks that I find the ride a tad firmer on the small stuff as well. I expected that, and I am not disappointed. The reduction in body roll is substantial and the overall feel is excellent. Nothing but compliments from the other Z owners in our club and have still not rubbed or scraped over anything!
__________________
![]() H&R / Stillen / Berk / HKS / Swift / Michelin / UpRev / SPC / Amuse Rep / Seibon / Fringe XVO / TWM / more... My Journal |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Track Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 657
Drives: 2010 370Z
Rep Power: 18 ![]() ![]() |
Checked my ride height today and it seems the springs have settled some more on the passenger side and it more or less matches the driver side. Current height: 26.625" front, 26.875" rear. That works out to 1.245" drop front, 1.115" drop rear.
__________________
SOLD 12/30/2011 2010 370Z Coupe Monterey Blue 6MT/Touring/Sport/Nav F.I. CBE CF w/ 12" Res | V1 | SecondSkin | Stillen G3 | EVO-R CF B-Pillars | Volk GT-S Ti Gunmetal 19x9.5 +30 F, 19x10.5 +8 R | Swift Spec-R Springs |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 2,359
Drives: 09 370Z Tour + Sport
Rep Power: 22 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
speedworks, great feedback. I too after the intial placebo effect wore off and have about 600 miles on the Swift springs with new paws felt it to be little stiffer than OEM, but much softer than Eibachs. Body roll, no chance can Eibachs compare to these, they are awesome.
I wish I had those numbers. Maybe I can achieve those numbers after a few hundred more miles and some hard twisties coming up on this weekends run. Or maybe I need a fat passenger to drop the passenger side ride height...haha |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Jersey
Age: 46
Posts: 4,855
Drives: to acquire tickets
Rep Power: 3526 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Ryan 314WHP | 260LB-FT | STILLEN | KONI | SWIFT | STOPTECH | Z1 | PROJECT MU | CNT | UPREV | FORGESTAR | BRIDGESTONE | PWJDM | ENEOS | MOTUL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 121 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Jon and I just ran the dragon with the swifts. Have to say that I was very pleased with how planted the Z felt, and how well they held up.
I ran into some alignment issues, as well as issues with the base front tires, but the springs were flawless as far as I could tell. Jon might be able to chime in more since his setup seemed to be working well. Whenever I get home, I have video of his car on the dragon, so you can see how planted it stays. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Swift Springs-- Nismo Review!! | JJ-NISMO | Brakes & Suspension | 39 | 07-29-2014 07:59 AM |
| [WTB] Swift Springs | Beastmode | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 1 | 09-13-2011 04:46 PM |
| BC ERs with Swift Springs and RA Valving REVIEW / (Picture Heavy) | Mozen | Brakes & Suspension | 31 | 05-24-2011 10:46 AM |
| WTB: Swift or H&R Springs | Mr&Mrs | Wanted | 5 | 04-26-2011 10:51 PM |
| Swift Springs | Justin1686 | North East Region | 10 | 02-24-2011 06:58 PM |